An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ...

An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ... An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ...

ifpri.cgiar.org
from ifpri.cgiar.org More from this publisher
23.01.2014 Views

3.6.2. The “food-bias” A decade ago Pelletier et al. argued that the nutrition policy documents of the government, donor strategy statements, and consultant reports, in which primary emphasis is given to achieving one or more food-related objectives (self-sufficiency, increased production, more efficient distribution, or food security at national, regional, or household levels), with the implicit assumption that nutritional improvement will follow indicating the existence of a “food-first” bias in the way malnutrition is implicitly viewed by decisionmakers and in the content of many nutrition programmes (1995). The situation is not much different today. The food-bias is still there as the consultant team noticed during the regional meetings. Most experts working in agriculture and food security bureaus believe that if the utilization aspect of FSS is well implemented then the nutrition issue will be no longer be an issue that requires a separate strategy. Perhaps it is because of this that the reviewed policy and strategy documents are indeed food-biased. The FSS and related policy and strategy documents had a food-bias or more broadly; as Robinson put it, they are ‘too agriculturally based’. Although preventive and curative health care is one of the four major components of the FSP, in reality this component is not addressed effectively by the implementing bureau in MOARD. The main gap in this regard is that a food secure but nutrition insecure household is not part of the target group of the FSS. If all of the nutrition-insecure – both those households that are and are not food-secure – are to be included as a target for the FSS, such a strategic goal will require the incorporation of non-food determinants of malnutrition such as caring and health particularly in a short to medium-term strategic approach targeting infants, children and pregnant and lactating women. In the long term, the two-way linkage of malnutrition and food insecurity to capture not only the inadequate diet effect but also the labor productivity effect of malnutrition on food production and availability should be part of the strategy in Ethiopia. Overall, according to the afore-mentioned policy documents, agricultural transformation has a multi-dimensional approach. However, the main schemes for transforming the agricultural production system in the country thus far have focused on improved adoption of yield enhancing technologies in the areas of crop and livestock production as well as in natural resources management. The main technologies in the crop sub-sector relate to seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, farm mechanisation and implements and irrigation through various systems including water-harvesting schemes. In the livestock subsector we are talking about such inputs as improved breeds, animal feeds and nutrition, animal health care, improved fishery/aqua-culture and honey production techniques. This transformation mechanism has a food-bias. It gives little room to the incorporation and integration of nutrition aspects. 3.6.3. Cross-cutting issues Improvement in agricultural production is not and cannot be a stand-alone effort. It requires an integrated holistic approach involving various sectors and sub-sectors. There is adequate evidence from long experience as well as quantitative data to show that health, education, and infrastructure play a major role in the ability of farmers and herders to be effective and efficient in their economic activities. Therefore, it is important to mention some of the areas that impinge on agricultural production and productivity and, in turn, on food security at different levels. 3.6.3.1. Sustainable land and water management Setting aside the debate over private land ownership in Ethiopia, it would nevertheless be unwise to urge poor farmers to invest in land or water development and adopt expensive technological packages under the existing situation of tenure insecurity. It has been often reported that the productive potential of most highland areas is being degraded rapidly 60

due to inappropriate land mismanagement. Rehabilitation and enhancement of degraded lands, as well as maintenance of unaffected lands, requires investment of resources and inputs. Nutrition criteria also should be applied to investments in sustainable land management projects. Of course in the food security strategy and instruments debates in Ethiopia, land is the most controversial of the four main assets (land, water, livestock, labour) owned by households. Recently it is being argued that the reasons for food insecurity are land degradation, drought, high population pressure, low input subsistence agriculture, small farm size and landlessness. In the past decades, demand for access to productive land became an agenda for those vulnerable and food insecure households. In response to the chronic food insecurity problems, most of these households opt to find a way out from the situation. This is an immediate and observable lesson in the whole country, particularly due to the recent drought, which affected 14 million Ethiopian. As a result, many people in hard-hit areas are moving spontaneously to forests and national parks. Present reality thus shows that desperate people will move, and that the choices they make without support may not improve their own or national welfare. Shrinking land size and fragmentation has been cited as causes of low productivity due to limitations on economies of scale to adapt and adopt improved technologies. Some argue that there is still a room to increase the yield of food crops, given the current land holding size, though further increases could come about through land consolidation programs (Demese 2004, EEA/EEPRI 2002). The World Bank states: ‘the scanty evidence that is available suggests that current land policy is not a major constraint on food security’ (World Bank 1999). Restrictions against the sale of land do not appear to lead to inefficiencies in land use; the crucial differentiating factor is rather livestock ownership. One thing that has become clear to all debating the issue of land: That it is important for farmers to feel more secure in order that they maintain the soil, adopt and adapt water harvesting technologies, and eventually diversify their home-based nutritionally-sound product mix by including the planting of fruit trees. 3.6.3.2. Agricultural Research There is no question that agricultural research and extension efforts so far focused on the yield aspect of agricultural production, with very little work on nutrition. In the process of undertaking informal interviews with Directors General of some regional research institutes, we were informed that the national variety release committee no longer focuses only on yield, but also on marketability, nutrition content, and other criteria to justify the release of a new variety. While a good beginning, agricultural research institutes still do not have an established procedure to identify causes of malnutrition in target areas and, based on this diagnosis, to develop research projects that are focused on developing biological technologies that solve the malnutrition problem identified. This is despite the increase in food-related malnutrition and malnutrition’s negative effect on the productivity of farmers. Low labor productivity is a major impediment to agricultural production in the country today. The issue here is how agricultural production develops interventions that address this subject. 3.6.3.3. Agricultural Extension The current National Extension Intervention Program (NEIP) of MOARD focuses on productivity of higher yielding areas – mostly maize and wheat growing areas in the highlands. The NEIP lacks any intensive extension interventions in the lowlands where most of the chronically food insecure woredas are located (Dereje and Demese 2003). Besides the extension package program, which focuses on fertilizer and improved seed, has not had an impact in the latter areas. The extension package also goes to households with a minimum of one hectare and is thus biased to better-off farmers. The CSA Agricultural Survey of 1996 shows that 47 percent of rural households have a per capita holding of less than 0.5 ha and 61

3.6.2. The “food-bias”<br />

A decade ago Pelletier et al. argued that <strong>the</strong> nutrition policy documents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

government, donor strategy statements, and consultant reports, <strong>in</strong> which primary emphasis is<br />

given to achiev<strong>in</strong>g one or more food-related objectives (self-sufficiency, <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

production, more efficient distribution, or food security at national, regional, or household<br />

levels), with <strong>the</strong> implicit assumption that nutritional improvement will follow <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

existence <strong>of</strong> a “food-first” bias <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> way <strong>malnutrition</strong> is implicitly viewed by decisionmakers<br />

and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> content <strong>of</strong> many nutrition programmes (1995). The situation is not much<br />

different today. The food-bias is still <strong>the</strong>re as <strong>the</strong> consultant team noticed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> regional<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>gs. Most experts work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> agriculture and food security bureaus believe that if <strong>the</strong><br />

utilization aspect <strong>of</strong> FSS is well implemented <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> nutrition issue will be no longer be an<br />

issue that requires a separate strategy. Perhaps it is because <strong>of</strong> this that <strong>the</strong> reviewed policy<br />

and strategy documents are <strong>in</strong>deed food-biased.<br />

The FSS and related policy and strategy documents had a food-bias or more broadly;<br />

as Rob<strong>in</strong>son put it, <strong>the</strong>y are ‘too agriculturally based’. Although preventive and curative<br />

health care is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four major components <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FSP, <strong>in</strong> reality this component is not<br />

addressed effectively by <strong>the</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g bureau <strong>in</strong> MOARD. The ma<strong>in</strong> gap <strong>in</strong> this regard is<br />

that a food secure but nutrition <strong>in</strong>secure household is not part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> target group <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FSS.<br />

If all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nutrition-<strong>in</strong>secure – both those households that are and are not food-secure – are<br />

to be <strong>in</strong>cluded as a target for <strong>the</strong> FSS, such a strategic goal will require <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>corporation <strong>of</strong><br />

non-food determ<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>of</strong> <strong>malnutrition</strong> such as car<strong>in</strong>g and health particularly <strong>in</strong> a short to<br />

medium-term strategic approach target<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fants, children and pregnant and lactat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

women. In <strong>the</strong> long term, <strong>the</strong> two-way l<strong>in</strong>kage <strong>of</strong> <strong>malnutrition</strong> and food <strong>in</strong>security to capture<br />

not only <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>adequate diet effect but also <strong>the</strong> labor productivity effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>malnutrition</strong> on<br />

food production and availability should be part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strategy <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ethiopia</strong>.<br />

Overall, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> afore-mentioned policy documents, agricultural<br />

transformation has a multi-dimensional approach. However, <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> schemes for<br />

transform<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> agricultural production system <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country thus far have focused on<br />

improved adoption <strong>of</strong> yield enhanc<strong>in</strong>g technologies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> crop and livestock<br />

production as well as <strong>in</strong> natural resources management. The ma<strong>in</strong> technologies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> crop<br />

sub-sector relate to seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, farm mechanisation and implements and<br />

irrigation through various systems <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g water-harvest<strong>in</strong>g schemes. In <strong>the</strong> livestock subsector<br />

we are talk<strong>in</strong>g about such <strong>in</strong>puts as improved breeds, animal feeds and nutrition, animal<br />

health care, improved fishery/aqua-culture and honey production techniques. This<br />

transformation mechanism has a food-bias. It gives little room to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>corporation and<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> nutrition aspects.<br />

3.6.3. Cross-cutt<strong>in</strong>g issues<br />

Improvement <strong>in</strong> agricultural production is not and cannot be a stand-alone effort. It<br />

requires an <strong>in</strong>tegrated holistic approach <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g various sectors and sub-sectors. There is<br />

adequate evidence from long experience as well as quantitative data to show that health,<br />

education, and <strong>in</strong>frastructure play a major role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> farmers and herders to be<br />

effective and efficient <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir economic activities. Therefore, it is important to mention some<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> areas that imp<strong>in</strong>ge on agricultural production and productivity and, <strong>in</strong> turn, on food<br />

security at different levels.<br />

3.6.3.1. Susta<strong>in</strong>able land and water management<br />

Sett<strong>in</strong>g aside <strong>the</strong> debate over private land ownership <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ethiopia</strong>, it would<br />

never<strong>the</strong>less be unwise to urge poor farmers to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> land or water development and adopt<br />

expensive technological packages under <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g situation <strong>of</strong> tenure <strong>in</strong>security. It has been<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten reported that <strong>the</strong> productive potential <strong>of</strong> most highland areas is be<strong>in</strong>g degraded rapidly<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!