An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ...
An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ...
An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 3.3: National, urban and rural <strong>malnutrition</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>of</strong> children under 5-years 2000<br />
Malnutrition <strong>in</strong>dicator<br />
Location<br />
Stunted Wasted Underweight<br />
National 56.8 9.6 45.0<br />
Urban 44.5 6.1 33.7<br />
Rural 57.9 9.9 46.7<br />
Source: MOFED 2002; CSA & ORC Macro 2001.<br />
lactat<strong>in</strong>g mo<strong>the</strong>rs, as did <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Nations Nationalities and Peoples (SNNP) region. In<br />
2000, both recorded that about 7 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rural population was needy. Though <strong>the</strong> record<br />
for Tigray was <strong>of</strong> a stable nutrition status, 34 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rural population was needy. In<br />
Somali, which is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pastoral regions, <strong>the</strong>re were major outbreaks <strong>of</strong> bloody diarrhea<br />
and <strong>malnutrition</strong>-related diseases with 42 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rural population be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> need. In<br />
general, <strong>the</strong> analyses revealed that for some regions, short-term, targeted food aid could<br />
compensate for <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> available foods, whereas o<strong>the</strong>r regions would benefit more from<br />
health and nutrition education or agricultural assistance.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> recent MDG report (MOFED, UN 2004), <strong>Ethiopia</strong> would have to<br />
reduce poverty by a factor <strong>of</strong> about 4.5 percent per annum through 2015 to meet <strong>the</strong><br />
Millennium Development Goals. This translates <strong>in</strong> to a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> poverty from its current<br />
level <strong>of</strong> 44 percent to 22 percent by 2015. The m<strong>in</strong>imum growth rate required to reduce<br />
poverty by this amount is about 6 percent. Moreover, real GDP is targeted to grow by at least<br />
7 percent on average dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> MDG period. However, such expectations have to be checked<br />
with past trends and realities. In 1990, <strong>the</strong> national poverty headcount was 48 percent. By<br />
2000, ten years later, it had only dropped to 44 percent. However, <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> stunted<br />
children has shown somewhat larger decl<strong>in</strong>es – <strong>in</strong> 1995, 67 percent and <strong>in</strong> 2000, 57 percent.<br />
It is important to note that <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ethiopia</strong> poverty rates are computed on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> a<br />
local poverty l<strong>in</strong>e, which is approximately Birr 1095 per person per year (Poverty Situation <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Ethiopia</strong> 1997). This is approximately Birr 3 (US$ 0.35 at <strong>the</strong> present exchange rate) per<br />
person per day. If purchas<strong>in</strong>g power party (PPP) is used to compute <strong>the</strong> dollar equivalent <strong>of</strong><br />
Birr 3, a figure closer to one dollar a day is atta<strong>in</strong>ed, particularly <strong>in</strong> rural areas.<br />
3.4.6. Market<strong>in</strong>g, trade and access to food<br />
Poverty reduction and food security efforts should be underp<strong>in</strong>ned by market driven<br />
rural development. <strong>Ethiopia</strong>’s experience over <strong>the</strong> last decade shows that <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
productivity is a necessary but not sufficient condition for <strong>in</strong>come augmentation at farm level.<br />
Farmers must also be able to sell <strong>the</strong>ir products pr<strong>of</strong>itably. This is more pronounced <strong>in</strong> a<br />
situation where most smallholder farmers are poor, food <strong>in</strong>secure, malnourished and more<br />
vulnerable to <strong>the</strong> vagaries <strong>of</strong> external shocks.<br />
The vast majority <strong>of</strong> rural travel (80-90 percent) on community roads is by foot<br />
(MOFED 2005). The typical modal split for rural roads is for at least 60 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trips to<br />
be by pack animal and for up to 30 percent to be by bus. Trips by pick-ups and trucks<br />
normally form a very small proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total. Quantities transported are very small and<br />
undertaken over poorly ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed roads or paths, lead<strong>in</strong>g to high transport costs. It is not<br />
unusual for farmers to have to travel 30 or 40 km to take <strong>the</strong>ir produce to markets. Mules and<br />
donkeys are <strong>the</strong> most common form <strong>of</strong> animal traction used for transport<strong>in</strong>g goods.<br />
52