An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ...
An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ...
An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Afar <strong>in</strong> 2000 was 12.6 percent and 50.5 percent, while <strong>the</strong> national prevalence was 10.5<br />
percent and 47.2 percent, respectively. Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 225 kg/person food crop (gra<strong>in</strong>) production<br />
as a benchmark for measur<strong>in</strong>g food crop production deficit, <strong>the</strong> food deficit <strong>in</strong> drought prone<br />
regions <strong>in</strong> 2000 was high.<br />
In addition to <strong>the</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>malnutrition</strong>, <strong>the</strong> poverty level and <strong>the</strong> average per<br />
capita food production differ by region. Benishangul-Gumuz, for example, a region with <strong>the</strong><br />
highest per capita food production <strong>in</strong> all <strong>the</strong> reported years – produc<strong>in</strong>g above <strong>the</strong> FAO<br />
recommended yearly per capita food <strong>in</strong>take – never<strong>the</strong>less has <strong>the</strong> highest poverty headcount<br />
<strong>of</strong> all regions. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that high agricultural production does not guarantee poverty<br />
reduction or a reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>malnutrition</strong>, s<strong>in</strong>ce poverty is one <strong>of</strong> its basic determ<strong>in</strong>ants.<br />
Food security policy, strategy, and programs<br />
Agricultural Development Led Industrialization (ADLI) is a strategy formulated to<br />
implement <strong>the</strong> national economic development policy, which is a policy <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g a market<br />
economy <strong>in</strong> contrast to <strong>the</strong> socialist economic policy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Derge regime. It has sectoral<br />
strategy documents, <strong>of</strong> which for <strong>the</strong> agriculture sector is <strong>the</strong> Rural Development Policy and<br />
Strategies (MOI 2001). Currently, ADLI’s mid-term program based implementation is<br />
through <strong>the</strong> Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development and Poverty Reduction Program (SDPRP). The RDPS<br />
and SDPRP documents are quite detailed and very specific <strong>in</strong> describ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> government’s<br />
overrid<strong>in</strong>g objectives and <strong>in</strong>tentions <strong>in</strong> “transform<strong>in</strong>g” <strong>the</strong> <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n agriculture. It is<br />
government policy that, to <strong>the</strong> extent possible, <strong>the</strong> food <strong>in</strong>secure should exit from food aid.<br />
The Food Security Strategy (FDRE 2002) is <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> document that, toge<strong>the</strong>r with<br />
<strong>the</strong> documents prepared by <strong>the</strong> NCFS (2003), gives <strong>the</strong> policy direction and implementation<br />
modalities <strong>of</strong> various food security related programs and <strong>in</strong>terventions, specifically for <strong>the</strong><br />
com<strong>in</strong>g five years. The core program <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ethiopia</strong>’s FSS is <strong>the</strong> Food Security Program (FSP),<br />
<strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> which is <strong>the</strong> responsibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Food Security Bureau, under<br />
MOARD. The goal <strong>of</strong> this program is to atta<strong>in</strong> food security for five million chronically food<br />
<strong>in</strong>secure people, while at <strong>the</strong> same time, improv<strong>in</strong>g and susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> overall food security <strong>of</strong><br />
an additional ten million people (NCFS 2003). This program has four broad areas <strong>of</strong> coverage<br />
with <strong>in</strong>ter-l<strong>in</strong>ked objectives to achieve this goal. These are (a) food availability to be<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased through improved crop and livestock production, (b) food access to be <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
through expanded agricultural and non-agricultural <strong>in</strong>comes, (c) promotion <strong>of</strong> preventive and<br />
curative health services, and (d) access to land provided through voluntary resettlement for up<br />
to 440,000 chronically food <strong>in</strong>secure households. Safety nets – conditional transfers – are used<br />
as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> approaches to improve food access. The first three coverage areas (a-c) are<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to <strong>the</strong> government’s capacity build<strong>in</strong>g effort and <strong>in</strong>ter-l<strong>in</strong>ked through <strong>the</strong> enhanced<br />
extension system. The enhanced extension system is also designed to support <strong>the</strong> communitybased,<br />
multi-annual plann<strong>in</strong>g approach that, among o<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>in</strong>gs, aims to ma<strong>in</strong>stream health<br />
issues. The preventive and curative health care promotion component <strong>of</strong> FSP is to address <strong>the</strong><br />
food utilization aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FSS.<br />
It is important to emphasis that <strong>the</strong> safety net programs are biased towards rural areas.<br />
There is no place for <strong>the</strong> urban poor to be part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se programs. This<br />
also has implications for <strong>the</strong> design and target<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> food security programs. Moreover,<br />
nutrition is not a core component <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> safety net programs.<br />
The food security strategy and nutrition gap<br />
Nutrition criteria applied to food security strategy and <strong>in</strong>terventions production<br />
maximizes <strong>the</strong> positive impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased food production or wide range <strong>of</strong> food products<br />
on nutritional status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people. In <strong>the</strong> FSS, NCFS and o<strong>the</strong>r related polic y documents <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>corporation <strong>of</strong> such criteria is negligible, and as a result even <strong>in</strong> those areas where major<br />
food security <strong>in</strong>terventions were undertaken, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>malnutrition</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>s high. This<br />
gap has to be narrowed. In order to have a nutrition secure society, <strong>the</strong> FDRE and Regional<br />
35