An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ...
An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ... An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ...
Institutional arrangements are also an important factor in sustaining and scaling up efforts in the development of water and sanitation services to a level that would have a significant impact on public health. The Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Water Resources, and the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) are key actors in the area of environmental health. The division of labor for these institutions is clearly indicated in proclamation 41 of 1993. The Ministry of Health is responsible for the safety of environment for health, such as the quality of drinking water and safe waste management, while the Ministry of Water Resources is responsible mainly for developing and implementing the engineering aspect of water supply and liquid waste management. The EPA by law is accountable to ensure the well-being of and maintenance of the ambient environment. At times, the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Water Resources have disputes concerning their respective roles in the implementation of small-scale water and sanitation projects, in particular for rural areas. Sanitation activities that involve the construction of low cost latrines for household use are the mandate of the MOH, while designing and construction improved drinking water sources is the responsibility of MOWR. In all cases of ensuring the prevention of source contamination, continued hygiene education during and after construction is monitored and evaluated by MOH. Further, the sectoral approach for both water and sanitation schemes is to maximize the benefits given limited resources. The financial aspect is also an input in the development of improved water and sanitation services in Ethiopia. The Government, through the MOWR, has continued to design and implement urban water projects. As a result, the proportion of beneficiaries in accessing safe drinking water is urban areas is growing far faster than in rural areas. There is hope that the National Health Extension Package will contribute to reducing this inequity in the near future. There are funds that are allocated by international and bilateral community to promote a healthy environment. The World Bank, ADB, UNICEF, and a number of NGOs are major partners in funding the sanitation and water development sector. Setting up drinking water supply systems within poor communities can also be part of Productive Safety Net Program that is now being implemented. The construction and maintenance of shared latrines in rural communities could be included among the public works carried out under the program. Such latrines can be positioned within rural population centers at health posts, extension centers, peasant association offices, demonstration centers, schools, as well as at food distribution centers. They can also serve as centers of education communication for changing sanitation and hygiene related behavior. Access to a safe environment is not only the responsibility of Government, but more importantly, it requires public and individual involvement. Community involvement and its mobilization in all aspects of sanitation are necessary to sustain the use and maintenance of sanitation projects and activities. The activation of community participation in sanitation thorough the Health Extension Packages Program is anticipated to sustain sanitation services. Health Extension workers in return give continued support for hygiene education and technical support to the beneficiaries. The development of culturally and economically acceptable sanitation facilities, like low cost latrine alternatives and monitoring and evaluation of their utilization are other aspects to sustain the physical inputs. The Health Posts in each village (with 1000 households), through the Health Extension Package, is designed to be a focal point to evaluate the performance and changes in health service delivery at village level, including in the areas of safe water and sanitation. 5.3.6. Health and sanitation policy issues in Ethiopia. Many initiatives formulate the national needs of environmental health services in Ethiopia. The Ethiopian Constitution in Article 44 states that every citizen has the right to live in a clean and healthy environment. The Ethiopian health policy also makes a number of statements on the provision of health services and sanitation. It emphasizes PHC as an approach for the preventive and curative components of health care in Ethiopia to reach the 154
grassroots population. Safeguarding the environment through the promotion of environmental health is considered as a priority issue. Diversification in the training of human resources has also received close attention. There are planned targets to improve coverage of the provision of safe drinking water from 25 percent to 35 percent and latrine coverage from 32 percent to 42 percent by the end of 2005. The coverage plan looks like it may be achieved, as 37.3 percent is the current coverage for water and 28.9 percent for sanitation. Drinking water quality monitoring coverage reached 44 percent. Public health proclamation No 200/2000 was issued and decisions on the issuance of related hygiene regulations are in progress. The big gaps between urban and rural areas concerning sanitation coverage, the inadequate and unstructured promotion of hygiene, limited resources, and the low focus on the integrations of sanitation with other health fields were identified as major challenges for the way forward. To further strengthen and improve the outcomes of the first two HSDPs, HSDP-III is to be implemented over the period of 2005/6-2009/10 (1998-2002 EC). It aims to achieve 80 percent of latrine coverage, 90 percent of drinking water quality monitoring, and 75 percent monitoring of food safety in food processing industries. There is also a strong commitment to ensure a complete and sustained proper utilization of sanitary facilities by the end of sector plan. The Ministry of Water Resources has a Water Sector Development Program that envisages by the end of 2011 to achieve 97.3 percent and 36.9 percent drinking water coverage for urban and rural communities, respectively, that will bring coverage of 60 percent at national level. The Health Extension Package (HEP) was taken as a tool to reach the rural population with the implementation of HSDP-II. Seven out of the 16 components of the HEP represent sanitation issues. Housing sanitation, drinking water supply, food hygiene, personal hygiene, solid and liquid waste management, latrine provisions, food hygiene, vector control are key elements of HEP. Disease prevention and control, (HIV/AIDS, TB, malaria) and promotion of family health (MCH, FP, EPI, adolescent health, and nutrition) are primary packages of HEP. HEP was developed and tested as a pilot in 2002/03, and has been implemented since 2003 with the training of health extension workers. HEP is understood as an essential health service targeting households through a strong focus on community-based approaches and sustained preventive and promotive health care. The goal of HEP is to bring behavioral changes towards a healthy environment by house-to-house education of the population. The health packages are expected to reach the households in the intervention program areas during the implementation of the HSDP with the aim of affecting the malpractices in hygiene, improving reproductive health & nutritional status, controlling common infections, and bringing equity in health services. There is accelerated activity that aims to improve the sanitation and drinking water supply in the country. By the year 2004, overall population access to some kind of latrine type and safe drinking source was documented at 29 percent and 37 percent, respectively. These figures were found to be much higher as compared to previous year status by a factor of 2.5 & 1.3 for latrine provision and access to safe drinking water sources, respectively. Regions like Amhara and Oromia were reported to achieve as much as 50 percent latrine coverage, while the Southern Nations covered 75 percent for the same year. Although these figures require validation, because such rapid increases are unlikely, public sanitation campaigns, political commitments, the implementation of health extension packages, and improved commitments of frontline health workers are believed to partially explain the situation. The Millennium Development Goal programs and universal access to health are also aiming to achieve stringent targets: by 2015, at least 64 percent of population will have access to safe water and 60 percent of the population will have access to latrines, with a target of 5 years later for the whole population to be covered. Achieving access to safe water and sanitation targets is a big challenge to the country, given the very slow growth in these areas that has been experienced over the last three decades. Significant improvement in diseases reduction, hence improvement in nutritional status, can only be gained when safe drinking water, provision of latrines, and hygienic 155
- Page 115 and 116: Figure 4.13: Prevalence of stunting
- Page 117 and 118: from poor exposure of children to l
- Page 119 and 120: 4.3.3.4. Response to food security
- Page 121 and 122: 4.3.6. Time and energy expenditure
- Page 123 and 124: Table 4.3: Care focused initiatives
- Page 125 and 126: together. This demands an integrate
- Page 127 and 128: In an emergency, therefore, care an
- Page 129 and 130: • Enhance women’s capacity for
- Page 131 and 132: Table 4.4: Analysis of care conside
- Page 133 and 134: Sector/ Office Strength Weakness Op
- Page 135 and 136: International initiative Strengths
- Page 137 and 138: • Rate of continued breastfeeding
- Page 139 and 140: Figure 4.17: Community based nutrit
- Page 141: There is a strong need for enhancin
- Page 144 and 145: supplies. The available facilities
- Page 146 and 147: 5.1. Introduction 5.1.1. Conceptual
- Page 148 and 149: access to a basic package of qualit
- Page 150 and 151: Integrating nutrition interventions
- Page 152 and 153: Although the coverage of ENA traini
- Page 154 and 155: Box 5.1: Household and Community In
- Page 156 and 157: The interventions that make up this
- Page 158 and 159: conferences. To this effect, a nati
- Page 160 and 161: with the engineering aspect of wate
- Page 162 and 163: Table 5.1: Prevalence of diarrhea a
- Page 164 and 165: Figure 5.3: Trends in latrine cover
- Page 168 and 169: ehavior are integrated and supplied
- Page 170 and 171: 5.4.2. Programs and projects 5.4.2.
- Page 172 and 173: made by NGOs for the affected child
- Page 175 and 176: CHAPTER 6: INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
- Page 177 and 178: interventions in Ethiopia, includin
- Page 179 and 180: 6.2. Challenges and Lessons Learnt
- Page 181 and 182: Training Post-secondary training is
- Page 183 and 184: Table 6.6: (continued) Agency Inter
- Page 185 and 186: Table 6.6: (continued) Agency Inter
- Page 187 and 188: Table 6.6: (continued) Agency Inter
- Page 189 and 190: Table 6.6: (continued) Agency Inter
- Page 191 and 192: Table 6.6: (continued) Agency Inter
- Page 193 and 194: Table 6.6: (continued) Agency Inter
- Page 195 and 196: Table 6.6: (continued) Agency Inter
- Page 197 and 198: Table 6.6: (continued) Agency Inter
- Page 199 and 200: Table 6.6: (continued) Agency Inter
- Page 201 and 202: Table 6.6: (continued) Agency Inter
- Page 203 and 204: Achievements Challenges Sustainabil
- Page 205 and 206: Berhane G. 1995. Nutrition surveill
- Page 207 and 208: Ethiopian PROFILES Team & AED/Linka
- Page 209 and 210: Middlebrook, P. 2002. Social protec
- Page 211 and 212: Raisin, J. 2001b. Improving food se
- Page 213: Yamano, T., H. Alderman, & L. Chris
Institutional arrangements are also an important factor <strong>in</strong> susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and scal<strong>in</strong>g up<br />
efforts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> water and sanitation services to a level that would have a<br />
significant impact on public health. The M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Health, <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Water Resources,<br />
and <strong>the</strong> Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) are key actors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />
health. The division <strong>of</strong> labor for <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>stitutions is clearly <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> proclamation 41 <strong>of</strong><br />
1993. The M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Health is responsible for <strong>the</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> environment for health, such as<br />
<strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water and safe waste management, while <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Water<br />
Resources is responsible ma<strong>in</strong>ly for develop<strong>in</strong>g and implement<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g aspect <strong>of</strong><br />
water supply and liquid waste management. The EPA by law is accountable to ensure <strong>the</strong><br />
well-be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ambient environment. At times, <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Health<br />
and <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Water Resources have disputes concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir respective roles <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> small-scale water and sanitation projects, <strong>in</strong> particular for rural areas.<br />
Sanitation activities that <strong>in</strong>volve <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> low cost latr<strong>in</strong>es for household use are<br />
<strong>the</strong> mandate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MOH, while design<strong>in</strong>g and construction improved dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water sources<br />
is <strong>the</strong> responsibility <strong>of</strong> MOWR. In all cases <strong>of</strong> ensur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> prevention <strong>of</strong> source<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ation, cont<strong>in</strong>ued hygiene education dur<strong>in</strong>g and after construction is monitored and<br />
evaluated by MOH. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> sectoral approach for both water and sanitation schemes is to<br />
maximize <strong>the</strong> benefits given limited resources.<br />
The f<strong>in</strong>ancial aspect is also an <strong>in</strong>put <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> improved water and<br />
sanitation services <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ethiopia</strong>. The Government, through <strong>the</strong> MOWR, has cont<strong>in</strong>ued to<br />
design and implement urban water projects. As a result, <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries <strong>in</strong><br />
access<strong>in</strong>g safe dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water is urban areas is grow<strong>in</strong>g far faster than <strong>in</strong> rural areas. There is<br />
hope that <strong>the</strong> National Health Extension Package will contribute to reduc<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong>equity <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> near future. There are funds that are allocated by <strong>in</strong>ternational and bilateral community to<br />
promote a healthy environment. The World Bank, ADB, UNICEF, and a number <strong>of</strong> NGOs<br />
are major partners <strong>in</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sanitation and water development sector.<br />
Sett<strong>in</strong>g up dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water supply systems with<strong>in</strong> poor communities can also be part <strong>of</strong><br />
Productive Safety Net Program that is now be<strong>in</strong>g implemented. The construction and<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>of</strong> shared latr<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> rural communities could be <strong>in</strong>cluded among <strong>the</strong> public<br />
works carried out under <strong>the</strong> program. Such latr<strong>in</strong>es can be positioned with<strong>in</strong> rural population<br />
centers at health posts, extension centers, peasant association <strong>of</strong>fices, demonstration centers,<br />
schools, as well as at food distribution centers. They can also serve as centers <strong>of</strong> education<br />
communication for chang<strong>in</strong>g sanitation and hygiene related behavior.<br />
Access to a safe environment is not only <strong>the</strong> responsibility <strong>of</strong> Government, but more<br />
importantly, it requires public and <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong>volvement. Community <strong>in</strong>volvement and its<br />
mobilization <strong>in</strong> all aspects <strong>of</strong> sanitation are necessary to susta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> use and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>of</strong><br />
sanitation projects and activities. The activation <strong>of</strong> community participation <strong>in</strong> sanitation<br />
thorough <strong>the</strong> Health Extension Packages Program is anticipated to susta<strong>in</strong> sanitation services.<br />
Health Extension workers <strong>in</strong> return give cont<strong>in</strong>ued support for hygiene education and<br />
technical support to <strong>the</strong> beneficiaries. The development <strong>of</strong> culturally and economically<br />
acceptable sanitation facilities, like low cost latr<strong>in</strong>e alternatives and monitor<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir utilization are o<strong>the</strong>r aspects to susta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical <strong>in</strong>puts. The Health Posts<br />
<strong>in</strong> each village (with 1000 households), through <strong>the</strong> Health Extension Package, is designed to<br />
be a focal po<strong>in</strong>t to evaluate <strong>the</strong> performance and changes <strong>in</strong> health service delivery at village<br />
level, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> safe water and sanitation.<br />
5.3.6. Health and sanitation policy issues <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ethiopia</strong>.<br />
Many <strong>in</strong>itiatives formulate <strong>the</strong> national needs <strong>of</strong> environmental health services <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Ethiopia</strong>. The <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n Constitution <strong>in</strong> Article 44 states that every citizen has <strong>the</strong> right to live<br />
<strong>in</strong> a clean and healthy environment. The <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n health policy also makes a number <strong>of</strong><br />
statements on <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> health services and sanitation. It emphasizes PHC as an<br />
approach for <strong>the</strong> preventive and curative components <strong>of</strong> health care <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ethiopia</strong> to reach <strong>the</strong><br />
154