An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ...

An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ... An assessment of the causes of malnutrition in Ethiopia: A ...

ifpri.cgiar.org
from ifpri.cgiar.org More from this publisher
23.01.2014 Views

unthinkable and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals targets, such as a reduction in the level of underweight, will be a mere dream. Better caring practices as an underlying cause malnutrition is a key factor in addressing this development problem. Caring is a cross cutting issue that cannot be addressed by any one development sector alone. It is at the household that different sector must come together to promote and enhance better care practices. There are gaps in the way policies and programs have been implemented with respect to caring practices at the household level. This has been due partly to the lack of a national nutrition strategy to guide necessary actions, roles, and responsibilities of the different sectors and agencies related to caring practices. Therefore, there is a need for policy and program modifications to ensure better caring practices at the household level. • The first important issue is that the role of better caring practice should be mainstreamed into the development plan of each sector. This might productively done by applying nutrition criteria to review the potential intended and unintended impact of investments, define optimal nutritional inputs from each sector, and identify potential opportunities to integrate nutrition initiatives across multiple sectors (i.e., the application of a Nutrition Lens to sectoral activities) (Micronutrient Initiative 2004). • There should be a nutrition coordination body within government that operates to ensure that better caring practices are taken into account in the nutritional activities across the various sectors and implementing bodies. Therefore, sectoral policies and strategies need to have caring practices as one of their performance indicators. In particular, various sectoral strategies that seek to develop the cadre of kebele -level development agents should insert improvements in local caring practices into the terms of reference under which these agents will work. The performance appraisal criteria for these agents should include the nutritional status of the populations of the communities with which they work. • Institutional frameworks have to be developed for monitoring and evaluation of better caring practices and to establish accountability mechanisms from the grassroots community to the federal level. A higher level government body can coordinate and monitor the other sectors that have a role in promoting better caring practices – Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture, Women’s Affairs Office, Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, Food Security Bureau, HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control Office, DPPC and NGOs. Caring practices are built on community’s resources and the enhancement of household level capacities for caregiving should be targeted. This requires partnership creation between the community resource people (health animators, health promoters, community volunteers) and the frontline development workers (Health extension workers, community health workers, agricultural home economist agents, development agents) reaching households in the community (facilitators). This will ensure the link between the strategy, service delivery outlets, and implementation at the household level. Figure 4.17 portrays the nature of the linkages between service delivery structures and the community, mediated by the facilitators and mobilizers, and the type of work done at the interface. The selection and training of facilitators and community mobilizers are key elements of the approach. Facilitators should not train mobilizers in what to do, but rather strive to empower them. This requires both participatory training methods and a power shift from the outside to facilitator and mobilizers. Outside support channeled through facilitators includes advocacy, information, education, training and direct service delivery (Gillespie & Haddad 2003). 126

Figure 4.17: Community based nutrition operational nexus Service delivery & support system Minimum basic services (Health, education, agricultural extension) Financing, training, supervision FACILITATORS Interface Planning, using ‘basic minimum needs’ goals & indicators. Implementation, Monitoring & Evaluation MOBILIZERS Community Community leaders, households, individuals Selection of ‘basic minimum needs’ goals & indicators Source: Tontisiron & Gillespie 1999. Empowerment of community mobilizers is enhanced by the existence of community organizations, an important contextual success factor identified in South Asia. If such organizations do not exist they need to be created to represent the nutritionally vulnerable people in the community. Woman’s groups or organizations are often the most committed and efficient in addressing nutrition problems. Indeed, the involvement of women is another prevalent contextual success factor, although it is important to combat the perception that solving nutrition problem is the sole responsibility of women. Successful program are thus 'gender focused’ and not 'woman focused'. Community participation is an essential factor of successfully sustaining community-based nutrition intervention programs. However, the sustainability of such programs needs to be thoroughly thought through when it comes to the issue of remuneration and incentives to the mobilizers. The experience of ESHE in SPNNR, and community IMCI in Tigray and Amhara regions are very good lessons to learn from. These communit y mobilizers are trained volunteers, respected residents of the community supported by the community level health workers (facilitators). There is a monthly meeting with the community level health workers and a quarterly meeting with the district health offices. The mobilizers perform behavior change communication for better caring practices using a mobilizer to household ratio of from one to 15 to one to 50. Development of community support groups for better caring using positive deviant caretakers from within the community must be done by all development 127

unth<strong>in</strong>kable and <strong>the</strong> achievement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Millennium Development Goals targets, such as a<br />

reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> underweight, will be a mere dream. Better car<strong>in</strong>g practices as an<br />

underly<strong>in</strong>g cause <strong>malnutrition</strong> is a key factor <strong>in</strong> address<strong>in</strong>g this development problem. Car<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is a cross cutt<strong>in</strong>g issue that cannot be addressed by any one development sector alone. It is at<br />

<strong>the</strong> household that different sector must come toge<strong>the</strong>r to promote and enhance better care<br />

practices. There are gaps <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> way policies and programs have been implemented with<br />

respect to car<strong>in</strong>g practices at <strong>the</strong> household level. This has been due partly to <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> a<br />

national nutrition strategy to guide necessary actions, roles, and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

different sectors and agencies related to car<strong>in</strong>g practices.<br />

Therefore, <strong>the</strong>re is a need for policy and program modifications to ensure better<br />

car<strong>in</strong>g practices at <strong>the</strong> household level.<br />

• The first important issue is that <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> better car<strong>in</strong>g practice should be<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>streamed <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> development plan <strong>of</strong> each sector. This might productively done<br />

by apply<strong>in</strong>g nutrition criteria to review <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>in</strong>tended and un<strong>in</strong>tended impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestments, def<strong>in</strong>e optimal nutritional <strong>in</strong>puts from each sector, and identify<br />

potential opportunities to <strong>in</strong>tegrate nutrition <strong>in</strong>itiatives across multiple sectors (i.e.,<br />

<strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> a Nutrition Lens to sectoral activities) (Micronutrient Initiative<br />

2004).<br />

• There should be a nutrition coord<strong>in</strong>ation body with<strong>in</strong> government that operates to<br />

ensure that better car<strong>in</strong>g practices are taken <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nutritional activities<br />

across <strong>the</strong> various sectors and implement<strong>in</strong>g bodies. Therefore, sectoral policies and<br />

strategies need to have car<strong>in</strong>g practices as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir performance <strong>in</strong>dicators. In<br />

particular, various sectoral strategies that seek to develop <strong>the</strong> cadre <strong>of</strong> kebele -level<br />

development agents should <strong>in</strong>sert improvements <strong>in</strong> local car<strong>in</strong>g practices <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />

terms <strong>of</strong> reference under which <strong>the</strong>se agents will work. The performance appraisal<br />

criteria for <strong>the</strong>se agents should <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> nutritional status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

communities with which <strong>the</strong>y work.<br />

• Institutional frameworks have to be developed for monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

better car<strong>in</strong>g practices and to establish accountability mechanisms from <strong>the</strong> grassroots<br />

community to <strong>the</strong> federal level. A higher level government body can coord<strong>in</strong>ate and<br />

monitor <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r sectors that have a role <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g better car<strong>in</strong>g practices –<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Health, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Education, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Women’s Affairs<br />

Office, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Labor and Social Affairs, Food Security Bureau, HIV/AIDS<br />

Prevention and Control Office, DPPC and NGOs.<br />

Car<strong>in</strong>g practices are built on community’s resources and <strong>the</strong> enhancement <strong>of</strong><br />

household level capacities for caregiv<strong>in</strong>g should be targeted. This requires partnership<br />

creation between <strong>the</strong> community resource people (health animators, health promoters,<br />

community volunteers) and <strong>the</strong> frontl<strong>in</strong>e development workers (Health extension workers,<br />

community health workers, agricultural home economist agents, development agents)<br />

reach<strong>in</strong>g households <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> community (facilitators). This will ensure <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>k between <strong>the</strong><br />

strategy, service delivery outlets, and implementation at <strong>the</strong> household level.<br />

Figure 4.17 portrays <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>kages between service delivery structures<br />

and <strong>the</strong> community, mediated by <strong>the</strong> facilitators and mobilizers, and <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> work done at<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terface.<br />

The selection and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> facilitators and community mobilizers are key elements<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> approach. Facilitators should not tra<strong>in</strong> mobilizers <strong>in</strong> what to do, but ra<strong>the</strong>r strive to<br />

empower <strong>the</strong>m. This requires both participatory tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g methods and a power shift from <strong>the</strong><br />

outside to facilitator and mobilizers. Outside support channeled through facilitators <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

advocacy, <strong>in</strong>formation, education, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and direct service delivery (Gillespie & Haddad<br />

2003).<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!