Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ... Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

ifpri.cgiar.org
from ifpri.cgiar.org More from this publisher
23.01.2014 Views

Respondents were asked whether the availability of pesticides had increased or decreased since 1992. Almost half the households had no opinion or said the question was not applicable because they never used pesticides. The number of households reporting improved availability (21 percent) was greater than the number reporting worse availability (15 percent), but the margin was not large. The strongest indications of improvement were in Borgou and Zou, while farmers in Ouémé reported a decline in availability (see Table 4.1.74). Labor The IFPRI-LARES Small Farmer Survey gathered information about the amount of labor devoted to different activities in growing each crop. This information was recorded for four types of labor: adult male family members, adult female family members, family members under 15 years of age, and hired laborers. The results presented here refer only to crops grown in the main agricultural season 10 . In calculating the number of person-days of work, we assumed that a day of labor by a child is equivalent to 0.5 days of labor for an adult. The results show that the total amount of labor allocated to main-season crop production is 565 person-days per farm or 170 person-days per hectare. The labor input per farm is quite different across departments, but the labor input per hectare varies much less. The labor input is between 130 and 180 days/hectare in every department except Atacora, where it is 227 days/hectare. The labor input per hectare is greatest in Atacora, the poorest department, while labor input is close to the lowest in Atlantique, so the variation may be due to differences in the opportunity cost of family labor (see Table 4.1.75). Labor use by activity The main activities are weeding (33 percent of the total labor time), land preparation (26 percent), and harvesting (23 percent). Differences in the allocation of labor to different activities does not follow a clear pattern, but presumably responds to the production characteristics of the main crops grown in each department (see Table 4.1.75). The composition of labor use by activity is remarkably similar across expenditure categories and for male- and female-headed households. The only difference is that male-headed households and poor households appear to devote apply more labor per hectare in their crop production. 10 Although the questionnaire also collected information on cotton production in the second season, this information was not incorporated because it complicated the interpretation of the results. 63

Labor use is quite different across farm-size categories. As farm size increases, the total amount of labor rises from 155 days in the smallest farm-size category to 1256 days in the largest. However, the amount of labor use per hectare falls steadily from 348 days/ha in the smallest farm-size category to 148 days/ha in the largest one (see Table 4.1.76). These results fit a pattern often found in studies of agriculture: that small farms are more intensively farmed that larger ones. An important reason, of course, is that, on small farms, there is more family labor available for each hectare of farmland. The composition of labor use by activity again shows little variation., although harvesting seems to account for a larger share among large farms. Examining labor use by crop, maize and sorghum/millet require the least labor input per hectare (119 and 88 days/ha, respectively), whereas manioc and cowpeas require 142 days/ha and cotton 150 days/ha. The data suggest that yams are the most labor intensive crop. The results also indicate that the two root crops (manioc and yams) require more land preparation and planting than the other crops, while a large part of the labor input for cotton (almost half) is allocated to the harvest (see Table 4.1.77). Labor use by type of labor Turning our attention to the types of labor used, the most notable finding is that over 80 percent of the farm households in Bénin hire at least some agricultural labor. The contribution of hired labor to the total labor inputs is much more modest: about one quarter of the person-days of work are carried out by hired labor. The use of hired labor is greatest in Atlantique and Ouémé, where high population densities reduce the transaction costs of labor markets and higher incomes allow farmers to use more hired labor. The contribution of hired labor is smallest in the sparsely populated Borgou and Atacora. Even in these departments, approximately 80 percent of the farm households hire some labor (see Table 4.1.78). The contribution of family labor varies from 57-59 percent in Atlantique and Ouémé to 86-87 percent in Atacroa, Borgou, and Mono. Within the family, the ratio of male-to-female labor input varies across departments. In Borgou and Atacora, males family members contribute more than twice as many days of labor as female family members, whereas the contribution of each gender is more equal in Atlantique, Zou, and Mono. Child labor represents about 8 percent of the total labor input for crop production 11 , and it varies from 3 to 14 percent depending on the crop (see Table 4.1.78). 11 As noted earlier, a day of child labor was considered equal to 0.5 person-days. 64

Respondents were asked whether the availability of pesticides had increased or decreased since<br />

1992. Almost half the households had no opinion or said the question was not applicable because<br />

they never used pesticides. The number of households reporting improved availability (21 percent)<br />

was greater than the number reporting worse availability (15 percent), but the margin was not large.<br />

The strongest indications of improvement were in Borgou and Zou, while farmers in Ouémé<br />

reported a decline in availability (see Table 4.1.74).<br />

Labor<br />

The IFPRI-LARES Small Farmer Survey gathered information about the amount of labor<br />

devoted to different activities in growing each crop. This information was recorded for four types<br />

of labor: adult male family members, adult female family members, family members under 15 years<br />

of age, and hired laborers. The results presented here refer only to crops grown in the main<br />

agricultural season 10 . <strong>In</strong> calculating the number of person-days of work, we assumed that a day of<br />

labor by a child is equivalent to 0.5 days of labor for an adult.<br />

The results show that the total amount of labor allocated to main-season crop production is 565<br />

person-days per farm or 170 person-days per hectare. The labor input per farm is quite different<br />

across departments, but the labor input per hectare varies much less. The labor input is between<br />

130 and 180 days/hectare in every department except Atacora, where it is 227 days/hectare. The<br />

labor input per hectare is greatest in Atacora, the poorest department, while labor input is close to<br />

the lowest in Atlantique, so the variation may be due to differences in the opportunity cost of family<br />

labor (see Table 4.1.75).<br />

Labor use by activity The main activities are weeding (33 percent of the total labor time),<br />

land preparation (26 percent), and harvesting (23 percent). Differences in the allocation of labor to<br />

different activities does not follow a clear pattern, but presumably responds to the production<br />

characteristics of the main crops grown in each department (see Table 4.1.75).<br />

The composition of labor use by activity is remarkably similar across expenditure categories and<br />

for male- and female-headed households. The only difference is that male-headed households and<br />

poor households appear to devote apply more labor per hectare in their crop production.<br />

10<br />

Although the questionnaire also collected information on cotton production in the second season,<br />

this information was not incorporated because it complicated the interpretation of the results.<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!