Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ... Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

ifpri.cgiar.org
from ifpri.cgiar.org More from this publisher
23.01.2014 Views

Seed use by crop Although only 18 percent of all seed used is purchased, for some crops farrmers rely heavily on purchased seed. For example, farmers purchase three-quarters of their seed requirements for “other vegetables” and a majority (57 percent) of their cowpea seeds. On the other hand, less than 10 percent of the yam, sorghum/millet, and piment seed is purchased. Maize and manioc are in an intermediate position, with purchases meeting 13 and 18 percent, respectively, of the seed requirements of each crop. In the case of cotton, SONAPRA supplies cotton seed without charge to GVs for distribution to farmers (see Table 4.1.40). Seed use by household type The proportion of seed that is bought or received free is higher in the south than in the north. For example, over half the seed used in Atlantique and about one-third of the seed in Ouémé and Mono is bought or received free. In contrast, the corresponding figures for Atacora and Borgou are 9 and 10 percent. Although a relatively high proportion of seed is purchased in Atlantique, the percentage of farm households that buy seed is small, just 26 percent. In contrast, over 70 percent of the farmers in Ouémé and Mono buy seed (see Table 4.1.41). The patterns of seed use between male- and female-headed households present a mixed picture. Male-headed households are somewhat more likely to buy seed, but female-headed households are more likely to obtain free seed. Female-headed households rely on purchased and free seed for a larger share of their total seed requirements (see Table 4.1.42). Similarly, the patterns of seed use across expenditure categories is somewhat contradictory. On the one hand, the proportion of household buying seed is relatively stable, being in the range of 53-62 percent for all groups. On the other, the share of total seed that is purchased or received free rises from 15-17 percent in the first two expenditure categories to 44 percent in the richest category (see Table 4.1.43). It is sometimes suggested that cash constraints keep farmers from purchasing high-yielding varieties of seed. If this is true, cotton farmers should be more likely to use purchased seed than other farmers. In fact, the survey results indicate that cotton growers are no more likely to buy seed than other farmers. For example, maize producers that also grow cotton are no more likely to buy maize seed than maize producers that do not grow cotton (see Table 4.1.44). This suggest that annual cash revenue is not a major constraint on input demand, although cash availability at the time of planting may be. 51

Seed purchase patterns Almost all purchased seed (98 percent) is bought on a cash basis. Unlike fertilizer, it is generally not possible to purchase seed on credit. The most important suppliers of purchased seed are traders (55 percent), other farmers (36 percent), and CARDER (6 percent) (see Table 4.1.45). The suppliers of seed and the large share of cash transactions do not vary markedly between male- and female-headed household, nor across expenditure categories. Changes in the availability of improved seed Farm households were asked whether the availability of improved seed varieties was better or worse than in 1992. Overall, the response was positive. Almost 40 percent reported that availability had improved and just 7 percent said that it had deteriorated. The remainder either saw no change (33 percent), had no opinion (18 percent), or said that the question was not applicable (2 percent) (see Table 4.1.46). The perception of improved availability of seed varieties was strongest in Atacora, where 60 percent saw improvement and just 2 percent reported a deterioration. The perception was weakest in Atlantique, where most farm households reported no change since 1992. Outside of Atlantique, however, the percentage saying that availability had improved was at least four times greater than the percentage saying it had gotten worse (see Table 4.1.46). The perception of improved availability was not limited to male-headed households or richer households. More households reported improvement than deterioration among both male- and female-headed households and among households in all five expenditure categories. In fact, poor households seemed to have a more favorable view of changes in seed availability than richer households did (see Tables 4.1.47 and 4.1.48). Change in use of purchased seed Respondents were also asked if their use of purchased seed for each crop had increased or decreased since 1992. A majority of those growing each crop said that there had been no change in the use of purchased seed, but for most crops the number of households reporting an increase exceeded the number reporting a decrease. The strongest evidence for the wider use of purchased seed is in the case of rice, where 38 percent report an increase, while just 4 percent report a decrease. Purchased seed use has also increased in the growing of sorghum/millet, yams, piment, “other vegetables,” cotton, and “other crops.” The evidence is weaker in the case of manioc and cowpeas. On the other hand, there is no indication of increased use of purchased maize seed and the use of purchased groundnut seed appears to have declined (see Table 4.1.49). 52

Seed use by crop Although only 18 percent of all seed used is purchased, for some crops<br />

farrmers rely heavily on purchased seed. For example, farmers purchase three-quarters of their<br />

seed requirements for “other vegetables” and a majority (57 percent) of their cowpea seeds. <strong>On</strong> the<br />

other hand, less than 10 percent of the yam, sorghum/millet, and piment seed is purchased. Maize<br />

and manioc are in an intermediate position, with purchases meeting 13 and 18 percent, respectively,<br />

of the seed requirements of each crop. <strong>In</strong> the case of cotton, SONAPRA supplies cotton seed<br />

without charge to GVs for distribution to farmers (see Table 4.1.40).<br />

Seed use by household type The proportion of seed that is bought or received free is<br />

higher in the south than in the north. For example, over half the seed used in Atlantique and about<br />

one-third of the seed in Ouémé and Mono is bought or received free. <strong>In</strong> contrast, the corresponding<br />

figures for Atacora and Borgou are 9 and 10 percent. Although a relatively high proportion of seed<br />

is purchased in Atlantique, the percentage of farm households that buy seed is small, just 26<br />

percent. <strong>In</strong> contrast, over 70 percent of the farmers in Ouémé and Mono buy seed (see Table<br />

4.1.41).<br />

The patterns of seed use between male- and female-headed households present a mixed picture.<br />

Male-headed households are somewhat more likely to buy seed, but female-headed households are<br />

more likely to obtain free seed. Female-headed households rely on purchased and free seed for a<br />

larger share of their total seed requirements (see Table 4.1.42).<br />

Similarly, the patterns of seed use across expenditure categories is somewhat contradictory. <strong>On</strong> the<br />

one hand, the proportion of household buying seed is relatively stable, being in the range of 53-62<br />

percent for all groups. <strong>On</strong> the other, the share of total seed that is purchased or received free rises<br />

from 15-17 percent in the first two expenditure categories to 44 percent in the richest category (see<br />

Table 4.1.43).<br />

It is sometimes suggested that cash constraints keep farmers from purchasing high-yielding<br />

varieties of seed. If this is true, cotton farmers should be more likely to use purchased seed than<br />

other farmers. <strong>In</strong> fact, the survey results indicate that cotton growers are no more likely to buy seed<br />

than other farmers. For example, maize producers that also grow cotton are no more likely to buy<br />

maize seed than maize producers that do not grow cotton (see Table 4.1.44). This suggest that<br />

annual cash revenue is not a major constraint on input demand, although cash availability at the<br />

time of planting may be.<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!