- Page 1 and 2: IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL MARKET REFOR
- Page 4 and 5: TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 - INTRO
- Page 6 and 7: 5.1.10 Expenditure patterns .......
- Page 8 and 9: CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION 1.1 Backgr
- Page 10 and 11: villageois, (GV)) was needed as the
- Page 12 and 13: CHAPTER 2: POLICY BACKGROUND FOR BE
- Page 14 and 15: 2.3 Evolution of Economic Policy 2.
- Page 16 and 17: Under pressure from the World Bank
- Page 18 and 19: anking system has been restored to
- Page 20 and 21: Fertilizer can be imported outside
- Page 22 and 23: particularly urban wage-earners. On
- Page 24 and 25: Soulé (1996) describes the evoluti
- Page 26 and 27: led to a more sustainable agricultu
- Page 28: Table 2.4 - Gross farm revenue from
- Page 31 and 32: Malawi’s economy is heavily depen
- Page 33 and 34: the reduction of its operations in
- Page 35 and 36: crops is also difficult because tob
- Page 37: Table 3.1 CROP 1982/83 1983/84 1984
- Page 41 and 42: Household characteristics Housing c
- Page 43 and 44: living from crop and livestock prod
- Page 45 and 46: If we focus our attention on the he
- Page 47 and 48: eported being a cooperative member.
- Page 49 and 50: little or no costs) and a smaller i
- Page 51 and 52: are highest among small farms and h
- Page 53 and 54: Farmers were also asked how they ob
- Page 55 and 56: household work (including cooking,
- Page 57 and 58: paying work in the informal sector.
- Page 59 and 60: Seed purchase patterns Almost all p
- Page 61 and 62: It is interesting to note that the
- Page 63 and 64: Perhaps the strongest factor determ
- Page 65 and 66: omitted crops include sorghum, mill
- Page 67 and 68: Finally, if we divided the farm hou
- Page 69 and 70: FCFA/farm. The percentage of grower
- Page 71 and 72: Labor use is quite different across
- Page 73 and 74: are involved in all activities, but
- Page 75 and 76: Agricultural assets The ownership o
- Page 77 and 78: The purpose of this section is not
- Page 79 and 80: households. The only clear patterns
- Page 81 and 82: Bénin is characterized by semi-sub
- Page 83 and 84: sorghum/millet output of Borgou is
- Page 85 and 86: sold on the market. Nonetheless, th
- Page 87 and 88: May 16 (see Table 4.1.118). The com
- Page 89 and 90:
involved in buying crops in a given
- Page 91 and 92:
The grenier or cabane is an indepen
- Page 93 and 94:
percent, while the proportion of cr
- Page 95 and 96:
largest farms. This implies that ho
- Page 97 and 98:
meat, and the small share allocated
- Page 99 and 100:
identifies the variables that are m
- Page 101 and 102:
make the results from the IFPRI-LAR
- Page 103 and 104:
farm households in Benin (95 percen
- Page 105 and 106:
With regard to the floors, the hous
- Page 107 and 108:
agricultural production and marketi
- Page 109 and 110:
Agricultural markets Friends and fa
- Page 111 and 112:
that higher values of the independe
- Page 113 and 114:
The questionnaire was developed by
- Page 115 and 116:
Current patterns On average, rural
- Page 117 and 118:
credit, while another third of the
- Page 119 and 120:
According to village leaders, howev
- Page 121 and 122:
estimates of the area planted to ma
- Page 123 and 124:
In the case of manioc, most of the
- Page 125 and 126:
Although inputs are imported by pri
- Page 127 and 128:
All or almost all the GVs in the sa
- Page 129 and 130:
4.3.5 Assets In general, the only p
- Page 131 and 132:
fact that farms, and hence the area
- Page 133 and 134:
available credit from this source i
- Page 135 and 136:
Input quality GV representatives we
- Page 137 and 138:
are grading and weighing the cotton
- Page 139 and 140:
Table 4.1.4-Household characteristi
- Page 141 and 142:
Table 4.1.10-School attendance by a
- Page 143 and 144:
Table 4.1.17-Main activity of head
- Page 145 and 146:
Table 4.1.22-Share of income from e
- Page 147 and 148:
Table 4.1.28-Number of plots and ar
- Page 149 and 150:
Table 4.1.35-Allocation of labor by
- Page 151 and 152:
Table 4.1.39-Change in labor alloca
- Page 153 and 154:
Table 4.1.44-Share of producers of
- Page 155 and 156:
Table 4.1.51-Change in use of purch
- Page 157 and 158:
Table 4.1.56-Fertilizer use by depa
- Page 159 and 160:
Table 4.1.62-Characteristics of fer
- Page 161 and 162:
Table 4.1.67-Perceived change in av
- Page 163 and 164:
Table 4.1.72-Pesticide use by depar
- Page 165 and 166:
Table 4.1.78-Share of each type of
- Page 167 and 168:
Table 4.1.86-Souce of loan by sex o
- Page 169 and 170:
Table 4.1.92-Percent of households
- Page 171 and 172:
Table 4.1.96-Percent of households
- Page 173 and 174:
Table 4.1.100-Summary of production
- Page 175 and 176:
Table 4.1.104-Area allocation by cr
- Page 177 and 178:
Table 4.1.108-Area allocation by cr
- Page 179 and 180:
Table 4.1.112-Marketed share of out
- Page 181 and 182:
Table 4.1.116-Descriptive statistic
- Page 183 and 184:
Table 4.1.118-Distribution of sales
- Page 185 and 186:
Table 4.1.124-Perceived change in v
- Page 187 and 188:
Table 4.1.132-Percent of households
- Page 189 and 190:
Table 4.1.138-Summary of expenditur
- Page 191 and 192:
Table 4.1.141-Food consumption by s
- Page 193 and 194:
Table 4.1.143-Food consumption by d
- Page 195 and 196:
Table 4.1.146-Non-food expenditures
- Page 197 and 198:
Table 4.1.150-Measures of poverty f
- Page 199 and 200:
Table 4.1.154-Value of household as
- Page 201 and 202:
Table 4.1.158-Value of household as
- Page 203 and 204:
Table 4.1.161-Housing characteristi
- Page 205 and 206:
Table 4.1.163-Main source of water
- Page 207 and 208:
Table 4.1.167-Frequency and nature
- Page 209 and 210:
Table 4.1.173-Source of information
- Page 211 and 212:
Table 4.1.180-Main reason for the i
- Page 213 and 214:
Table 4.2.1-Road infrastructure Reg
- Page 215 and 216:
Table 4.2.8-Frequency of closest ma
- Page 217 and 218:
Table 4.2.16-Share of village maize
- Page 219 and 220:
Table 4.2.26-Change in availability
- Page 221 and 222:
Table 4.2.33-Commodity balance in e
- Page 223 and 224:
Table 4.2.35-Change in production o
- Page 225 and 226:
Table 4.3.5-Number of members at st
- Page 227 and 228:
Table 4.3.11-Descriptive statistics
- Page 229 and 230:
Table 4.3.16-Distribution of GVs by
- Page 231 and 232:
Table 4.3.20-Percent of GVs satisif
- Page 233 and 234:
Table 4.3.28-Characteristics of cot
- Page 235 and 236:
Table 4.3.36-Percent of revenue fro
- Page 237 and 238:
Table 4.3.44-Opinion of changes in
- Page 239 and 240:
participate in the survey or if the
- Page 241 and 242:
expenditures as well as the rental
- Page 243 and 244:
headed households seem to be more c
- Page 245 and 246:
size is 1.4 ha. The largest farms a
- Page 247 and 248:
consuming family labor activities f
- Page 249 and 250:
Table 5.14 provides a definition an
- Page 251 and 252:
suggests that farmers in remote are
- Page 253 and 254:
which as we mentioned earlier, is a
- Page 255 and 256:
eforms. These last two findings sug
- Page 257 and 258:
share of tobacco and non-tobacco gr
- Page 259 and 260:
the main storage space. Pits are mo
- Page 261 and 262:
heavily controlled by household hea
- Page 263 and 264:
ADMARC captures another 17 percent,
- Page 265 and 266:
Overall expenditure patterns Accord
- Page 267 and 268:
vegetables and legumes, dairy produ
- Page 269 and 270:
This is followed by clothing (17 pe
- Page 271 and 272:
5.1.11 Household assets and housing
- Page 273 and 274:
information on agricultural input u
- Page 275 and 276:
off) and earning more money from no
- Page 277 and 278:
5.2.2 General information In genera
- Page 279 and 280:
5.2.5 Transportation Services Table
- Page 281 and 282:
The most common fertilizers distrib
- Page 283 and 284:
Table 5.1 - IFPRI/APRU Smallholder
- Page 285 and 286:
Table 5.5 - Sources of income and i
- Page 287 and 288:
Table 5.9 - Farm Characteristics by
- Page 289 and 290:
Table 5.14 - Descriptive statistics
- Page 291 and 292:
Table 5.16 - Determinants of quanti
- Page 293 and 294:
Table 5.20 - Average price paid by
- Page 295 and 296:
Table 5.23 - Ownership of agricultu
- Page 297 and 298:
Table 5.27 - Percent of households
- Page 299 and 300:
Table 5.32 - Use of storage facilit
- Page 301 and 302:
Table 5.36 - Distribution of househ
- Page 303 and 304:
Table 5.39 - Percent use of types o
- Page 305 and 306:
Table 5.44 - Summary of food expend
- Page 307 and 308:
Table 5.46 - Percent of households
- Page 309 and 310:
Table 5.48 - Food consumption by re
- Page 311 and 312:
Table 5.50 - Percent of households
- Page 313 and 314:
Table 5.53 - Non-food expenditure p
- Page 315 and 316:
Television,VCR 1 0.0 1.0 0.0 7 919
- Page 317 and 318:
Table 5.61 - Percent of households
- Page 319 and 320:
Table 5.63 - Perceptions about chan
- Page 321 and 322:
Table 5.69 - General information fo
- Page 323 and 324:
Table 5.74 - Availability of transp
- Page 325 and 326:
Table 5.78 - Changes in the number
- Page 327 and 328:
Figure 5.3 - Percentage of househol
- Page 329 and 330:
322
- Page 331 and 332:
Land use The average farm size
- Page 333 and 334:
Crop production and storage Maize
- Page 335 and 336:
Poor households devote a larger sha
- Page 337 and 338:
Perceived problems of GVs Few GVs
- Page 339 and 340:
For manioc, most of the surplus vil
- Page 341 and 342:
Furthermore, the system facilitates
- Page 343 and 344:
Address problems of corruption in w
- Page 345 and 346:
Household Characteristics and Incom
- Page 347 and 348:
Use of credit A little less than
- Page 349 and 350:
About 62 percent of the households
- Page 351 and 352:
of credit use highlights a market f
- Page 353 and 354:
ecause reforms have also been accom
- Page 355 and 356:
348
- Page 357:
National Economic Council (NEC). 19