Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ... Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

ifpri.cgiar.org
from ifpri.cgiar.org More from this publisher
23.01.2014 Views

The changes in the number and types of traders since 1995 are reported in Table 5.78. For the majority of the EPAs (64 percent), the number of assemblers has not changed; in 21 percent of the EPAs, the number of assemblers has actually declined. On the other hand, the number of private crop wholesalers and retailers has increased in most EPAs, whereas the number of ADMARC crop markets has not changed in most cases (81 percent of the EPAs). This indicates that market reform has led to an increase in the number of private traders. This usually should lead to greater market competition, better prices, and more market choices for producers and consumers. In the input markets, the number of private retailers seems to have increased the most, followed by private wholesalers. For most ADMARC input markets and the subsidiary of input manufacturers, there are no changes since 1995. In all cases, it is the number of retailers that has increased the most since the reforms. This is expected since retailing is an easy business to get into and does not require a lot of capital, technical expertise, or business savvy as wholesaling would. 5.2.7 Starter Pack Initiative (SPS) The EPA survey indicates that, as expected, all the EPAs were included in the SPS during the 1998/99 season. About 93 percent of the households in each EPA were included in the SPS. This is not surprising since the SPS was supposed to cover all farming households and some of the households in each EPA may not be involved in farming. In 95 percent of the cases, both fertilizer (urea or 23-21-0) and seed (mainly maize, groundnuts, and soybeans) were distributed for free. In about 5 percent of the EPAs, only fertilizer was distributed. The quantities distributed were about 15 kgs of fertilizer and 4 kgs of seeds. 5.2.8 Agricultural Productivity Investment Program (APIP) About 97 percent of the EPAs were covered in the APIP, but only 10 percent of the households in each EPA were part of the program. A higher percent of households in the Northern region were included (19 percent compared to 8 percent of the households in the Center and 5 in the South). The APIP is a more selective program; it only includes households who are interested in applying for input on credit and who are eligible for credit (no history of loan default and demonstrated ability to repay). Again, in 90 percent of the cases, both fertilizer and seed are distributed on credit under the APIP. The average quantities given are 98 kgs of fertilizer and 10 kgs of seed. 273

The most common fertilizers distributed are urea and 23-21-0 and the most common seeds are maize followed by soybeans. The average value of the input-credit APIP package is about MK 2,043 (US $45). Households usually pay back the loan in cash or a combination of in-kind and cash at a specified loan closing date. 5.2.9 Farmers’ Associations and Clubs On average, each EPA has about one farmers association and 121 farmers’ clubs. Clubs are usually made up of a few farmers and are useful for farmers to market their cash crops together (such as selling tobacco on the auction floor) and obtain input on credit as a group. The most common types of clubs are tobacco and horticultural clubs. Associations are usually more formal and are made up of several clubs. Both clubs and associations are, in most cases, initiated by the MOAI, but in some instances they are self-initiated by the farmers themselves (more for clubs than associations). 5.2.10 Formal and Informal Credit Services Each EPA has, on average, 3 moneylenders, less than one commercial bank branch, about 2 Malawi Rural Finance Corporation (MRFC) branches, about 1.5 NGOs, and very few have Savings and Credit Cooperatives (SACCO) (see Table 5.79). NGOs and MRFC branches are more heavily concentrated in the South while no moneylenders were reported in the Center. We also find more commercial bank branches in the North. Not all these credit institutions lend to small farmers however. For example, only 12 percent of commercial banks and 2/3 of SACCO lend to small farmers. The other credit institutions all lend to small farmers. As Table 5.80 shows, the number of moneylenders and NGOs seems to have increased since 1995. For the other credit institutions, few EPAs report changes in their availability in their respective areas. 274

The changes in the number and types of traders since 1995 are reported in Table 5.78. For the<br />

majority of the EPAs (64 percent), the number of assemblers has not changed; in 21 percent of<br />

the EPAs, the number of assemblers has actually declined. <strong>On</strong> the other hand, the number of<br />

private crop wholesalers and retailers has increased in most EPAs, whereas the number of<br />

ADMARC crop markets has not changed in most cases (81 percent of the EPAs). This indicates<br />

that market reform has led to an increase in the number of private traders. This usually should<br />

lead to greater market competition, better prices, and more market choices for producers and<br />

consumers. <strong>In</strong> the input markets, the number of private retailers seems to have increased the<br />

most, followed by private wholesalers. For most ADMARC input markets and the subsidiary of<br />

input manufacturers, there are no changes since 1995. <strong>In</strong> all cases, it is the number of retailers<br />

that has increased the most since the reforms. This is expected since retailing is an easy business<br />

to get into and does not require a lot of capital, technical expertise, or business savvy as<br />

wholesaling would.<br />

5.2.7 Starter Pack <strong>In</strong>itiative (SPS)<br />

The EPA survey indicates that, as expected, all the EPAs were included in the SPS during the<br />

1998/99 season. About 93 percent of the households in each EPA were included in the SPS. This<br />

is not surprising since the SPS was supposed to cover all farming households and some of the<br />

households in each EPA may not be involved in farming. <strong>In</strong> 95 percent of the cases, both<br />

fertilizer (urea or 23-21-0) and seed (mainly maize, groundnuts, and soybeans) were distributed<br />

for free. <strong>In</strong> about 5 percent of the EPAs, only fertilizer was distributed. The quantities distributed<br />

were about 15 kgs of fertilizer and 4 kgs of seeds.<br />

5.2.8 <strong>Agricultural</strong> Productivity <strong>In</strong>vestment Program (APIP)<br />

About 97 percent of the EPAs were covered in the APIP, but only 10 percent of the households in<br />

each EPA were part of the program. A higher percent of households in the Northern region were<br />

included (19 percent compared to 8 percent of the households in the Center and 5 in the South).<br />

The APIP is a more selective program; it only includes households who are interested in applying<br />

for input on credit and who are eligible for credit (no history of loan default and demonstrated<br />

ability to repay). Again, in 90 percent of the cases, both fertilizer and seed are distributed on<br />

credit under the APIP. The average quantities given are 98 kgs of fertilizer and 10 kgs of seed.<br />

273

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!