Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...
Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ... Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...
The changes in the number and types of traders since 1995 are reported in Table 5.78. For the majority of the EPAs (64 percent), the number of assemblers has not changed; in 21 percent of the EPAs, the number of assemblers has actually declined. On the other hand, the number of private crop wholesalers and retailers has increased in most EPAs, whereas the number of ADMARC crop markets has not changed in most cases (81 percent of the EPAs). This indicates that market reform has led to an increase in the number of private traders. This usually should lead to greater market competition, better prices, and more market choices for producers and consumers. In the input markets, the number of private retailers seems to have increased the most, followed by private wholesalers. For most ADMARC input markets and the subsidiary of input manufacturers, there are no changes since 1995. In all cases, it is the number of retailers that has increased the most since the reforms. This is expected since retailing is an easy business to get into and does not require a lot of capital, technical expertise, or business savvy as wholesaling would. 5.2.7 Starter Pack Initiative (SPS) The EPA survey indicates that, as expected, all the EPAs were included in the SPS during the 1998/99 season. About 93 percent of the households in each EPA were included in the SPS. This is not surprising since the SPS was supposed to cover all farming households and some of the households in each EPA may not be involved in farming. In 95 percent of the cases, both fertilizer (urea or 23-21-0) and seed (mainly maize, groundnuts, and soybeans) were distributed for free. In about 5 percent of the EPAs, only fertilizer was distributed. The quantities distributed were about 15 kgs of fertilizer and 4 kgs of seeds. 5.2.8 Agricultural Productivity Investment Program (APIP) About 97 percent of the EPAs were covered in the APIP, but only 10 percent of the households in each EPA were part of the program. A higher percent of households in the Northern region were included (19 percent compared to 8 percent of the households in the Center and 5 in the South). The APIP is a more selective program; it only includes households who are interested in applying for input on credit and who are eligible for credit (no history of loan default and demonstrated ability to repay). Again, in 90 percent of the cases, both fertilizer and seed are distributed on credit under the APIP. The average quantities given are 98 kgs of fertilizer and 10 kgs of seed. 273
The most common fertilizers distributed are urea and 23-21-0 and the most common seeds are maize followed by soybeans. The average value of the input-credit APIP package is about MK 2,043 (US $45). Households usually pay back the loan in cash or a combination of in-kind and cash at a specified loan closing date. 5.2.9 Farmers’ Associations and Clubs On average, each EPA has about one farmers association and 121 farmers’ clubs. Clubs are usually made up of a few farmers and are useful for farmers to market their cash crops together (such as selling tobacco on the auction floor) and obtain input on credit as a group. The most common types of clubs are tobacco and horticultural clubs. Associations are usually more formal and are made up of several clubs. Both clubs and associations are, in most cases, initiated by the MOAI, but in some instances they are self-initiated by the farmers themselves (more for clubs than associations). 5.2.10 Formal and Informal Credit Services Each EPA has, on average, 3 moneylenders, less than one commercial bank branch, about 2 Malawi Rural Finance Corporation (MRFC) branches, about 1.5 NGOs, and very few have Savings and Credit Cooperatives (SACCO) (see Table 5.79). NGOs and MRFC branches are more heavily concentrated in the South while no moneylenders were reported in the Center. We also find more commercial bank branches in the North. Not all these credit institutions lend to small farmers however. For example, only 12 percent of commercial banks and 2/3 of SACCO lend to small farmers. The other credit institutions all lend to small farmers. As Table 5.80 shows, the number of moneylenders and NGOs seems to have increased since 1995. For the other credit institutions, few EPAs report changes in their availability in their respective areas. 274
- Page 230 and 231: Table 4.3.19-Distribution of GVs by
- Page 232 and 233: Table 4.3.24-Percentage of inputs s
- Page 234 and 235: Table 4.3.32-Average value of curre
- Page 236 and 237: Table 4.3.40-Percentage of GVs in w
- Page 238 and 239: CHAPTER 5 - RESULTS FROM THE MALAWI
- Page 240 and 241: The weights are used to calculate a
- Page 242 and 243: On average, around 20 percent of th
- Page 244 and 245: agricultural work. Other less commo
- Page 246 and 247: 5.1.4 Time allocation In Malawi, as
- Page 248 and 249: attributed it to the fact that fert
- Page 250 and 251: insignificant. The coefficient on t
- Page 252 and 253: As in the results from the previous
- Page 254 and 255: most important sources of input on
- Page 256 and 257: applied for credit compared to 20 p
- Page 258 and 259: less than 1 mt per ha which are fai
- Page 260 and 261: 5.1.9 Agricultural marketing Market
- Page 262 and 263: Households that belong to a club al
- Page 264 and 265: most important contractors are the
- Page 266 and 267: indicates that the extent of povert
- Page 268 and 269: wheat, and fruits and nuts, a highe
- Page 270 and 271: Surprisingly, the education of the
- Page 272 and 273: Housing characteristics The overwhe
- Page 274 and 275: It was also important to find out w
- Page 276 and 277: Surprisingly, tobacco growers are m
- Page 278 and 279: Over three-quarter of the EPAs repo
- Page 282 and 283: 5.2.11 Storage Facilities On averag
- Page 284 and 285: Table 5.2 - Household characteristi
- Page 286 and 287: Table 5.7 - Percentage of household
- Page 288 and 289: Table 5.12 - Farm labor use and all
- Page 290 and 291: Table 5.15 - Determinants of the de
- Page 292 and 293: Table 5.17 - Sources of fertilizer
- Page 294 and 295: Table 5.22 - Access and use of cred
- Page 296 and 297: Table 5.25 - Percent of households
- Page 298 and 299: Table 5.29 - Percent of households
- Page 300 and 301: Table 5.34 - Crop disposal by type
- Page 302 and 303: Table 5.38 - Determinants of Market
- Page 304 and 305: Table 5.42 - Summary of expenditure
- Page 306 and 307: Table 5.45 - Food consumption by so
- Page 308 and 309: Table 5.47 - Percent of households
- Page 310 and 311: Table 5.49 - Percent of households
- Page 312 and 313: Table 5.51 - Food consumption by ex
- Page 314 and 315: Table 5.56 - Determinants of per ca
- Page 316 and 317: Table 5.59 Percent of households ow
- Page 318 and 319: Table 5.62 - Characteristics of the
- Page 320 and 321: Table 5.68 - Determinants of percei
- Page 322 and 323: Table 5.71 - Average yields per cro
- Page 324 and 325: Table 5.77 - Changes in the availab
- Page 326 and 327: Figure 5.1 Distribution of househol
- Page 328 and 329: Figure 5.7 - Percentage of Househol
The changes in the number and types of traders since 1995 are reported in Table 5.78. For the<br />
majority of the EPAs (64 percent), the number of assemblers has not changed; in 21 percent of<br />
the EPAs, the number of assemblers has actually declined. <strong>On</strong> the other hand, the number of<br />
private crop wholesalers and retailers has increased in most EPAs, whereas the number of<br />
ADMARC crop markets has not changed in most cases (81 percent of the EPAs). This indicates<br />
that market reform has led to an increase in the number of private traders. This usually should<br />
lead to greater market competition, better prices, and more market choices for producers and<br />
consumers. <strong>In</strong> the input markets, the number of private retailers seems to have increased the<br />
most, followed by private wholesalers. For most ADMARC input markets and the subsidiary of<br />
input manufacturers, there are no changes since 1995. <strong>In</strong> all cases, it is the number of retailers<br />
that has increased the most since the reforms. This is expected since retailing is an easy business<br />
to get into and does not require a lot of capital, technical expertise, or business savvy as<br />
wholesaling would.<br />
5.2.7 Starter Pack <strong>In</strong>itiative (SPS)<br />
The EPA survey indicates that, as expected, all the EPAs were included in the SPS during the<br />
1998/99 season. About 93 percent of the households in each EPA were included in the SPS. This<br />
is not surprising since the SPS was supposed to cover all farming households and some of the<br />
households in each EPA may not be involved in farming. <strong>In</strong> 95 percent of the cases, both<br />
fertilizer (urea or 23-21-0) and seed (mainly maize, groundnuts, and soybeans) were distributed<br />
for free. <strong>In</strong> about 5 percent of the EPAs, only fertilizer was distributed. The quantities distributed<br />
were about 15 kgs of fertilizer and 4 kgs of seeds.<br />
5.2.8 <strong>Agricultural</strong> Productivity <strong>In</strong>vestment Program (APIP)<br />
About 97 percent of the EPAs were covered in the APIP, but only 10 percent of the households in<br />
each EPA were part of the program. A higher percent of households in the Northern region were<br />
included (19 percent compared to 8 percent of the households in the Center and 5 in the South).<br />
The APIP is a more selective program; it only includes households who are interested in applying<br />
for input on credit and who are eligible for credit (no history of loan default and demonstrated<br />
ability to repay). Again, in 90 percent of the cases, both fertilizer and seed are distributed on<br />
credit under the APIP. The average quantities given are 98 kgs of fertilizer and 10 kgs of seed.<br />
273