Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ... Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

ifpri.cgiar.org
from ifpri.cgiar.org More from this publisher
23.01.2014 Views

most important sources of input on credit are the Malawi Rural Finance Corporation (33 percent of households), other sources (26 percent), ADMARC (14 percent), friends (14 percent), and traders (11 percent). Traders in the Central region are more active as a source of input on credit. In the North, the MRFC is the most important source of input on credit, while in the South, other sources of input on credit are the most common. Traders and ADMARC seem to provide very little input on credit to female-headed households; less than 8 percent of all female-headed households receive input on credit from these sources. Female-headed households rely mainly on other sources of credit, MRFC, and friends. ADMARC’s input on credit seems to favor more male-headed households and farmers with larger farm sizes. Tables 5.19 and 5.20 show the average price paid for the different types of seeds and fertilizers as well as the average distance to the input source. Average distance to an input source is 6 km, which is not excessively far. About 90 percent of all input purchases are conducted by the household head. 5.1.6 Changes in labor and inputs since 1995 In order to capture changes in access to and use of inputs since the reforms of 1995, farmers were asked directly about changes in their use of inputs such as hired labor, family work done by women, seeds, and fertilizer, since 1995. As shown in Table 5.21, the majority of farmers reported no change in the use of these inputs. Only about 9 percent noted a decrease in the use of hired labor or family work performed by women, whereas about one-third said that their use of women labor had increased. Also, only about 16-18 percent reported that their use of seeds or fertilizer had decreased since 1995. This indicates that input market liberalization is not perceived as having had dramatic impact on the use of labor, fertilizer or seeds by small farmers. For those who reported changes in input use, the main reason for the increase in labor use was a change in cropping pattern, whereas the main reason for the decrease in labor was blamed on the inavailability or high cost of labor. Among farmers that claimed a change in the use of purchased seeds or fertilizers, the main reason behind the decrease in use was higher prices. For those who increased their use of input, this was attributed to higher revenues from buying and applying the input. In addition, for seeds, about one-third of the farmers that increased their use of purchased seeds explained that the main reason for the increase was the higher availability of seeds since the 247

eforms. These last two findings suggests that (a) farmers that have increased their use of inputs have either realized the benefits of modern agricultural technology or, more likely, they have diversified into higher value crops (such as tobacco) where the application of more expensive inputs is more profitable; and (b) seeds have become more available since 1995, albeit at higher prices. Access to and use of credit As expected, not many smallholder farmers apply for credit. A little less than 20 percent of the smallholder farmer households applied for credit during the period June 1997 to June 1998 (see Table 5.22). The main reasons cited for not applying for credit are due to (1) difficulties dealing with lending institutions (32 percent), (2) unavailability of credit institutions (24 percent), (3) lack of collateral (19 percent), and (4) not wanting to borrow money (18 percent). In over 90 percent of the households, it is the household head who applies for the loan. Of those that applied for a loan, only two-third received the loan they applied for. The main purposes for a credit application are for personal expenses (37 percent of the applicants), agricultural investments (28 percent), or fertilizer purchases (14 percent). The main sources of credit were friends and family (57 percent of applicants), followed by the MRFC (17 percent), the National Association of Business Women (NABW) (4 percent) and the Small Enterprise Development Organization of Malawi (SEDOM) (4 percent). As in many other sub-Saharan African countries where rural credit markets are not well developed, smallholders have to rely mainly on relatives and friends to secure some credit when they are cash-constrained. The average amount borrowed is about MK 550 for an average period of four months and at an average monthly interest rate of 7 percent Only 25 percent of the households mentioned that their access to credit has changed since 1995. Of those households, 59 percent said that there has been an increase in access to credit while 41 percent said there was a decrease. The decrease in credit access is attributed solely to the closure of a credit source in the area. Of those that experienced an increase in credit access, the main contributing factors are less collateral requirement (40 percent), more availability of different sources of credit (35 percent), and a new source of credit opened in the area (24 percent). Contrary to expectations, female-headed households do not seem to have significantly less access to credit than male-headed households. As Table 5.22 indicates, about 16 percent of the former 248

most important sources of input on credit are the Malawi Rural Finance Corporation (33 percent<br />

of households), other sources (26 percent), ADMARC (14 percent), friends (14 percent), and<br />

traders (11 percent). Traders in the Central region are more active as a source of input on credit.<br />

<strong>In</strong> the North, the MRFC is the most important source of input on credit, while in the South, other<br />

sources of input on credit are the most common. Traders and ADMARC seem to provide very<br />

little input on credit to female-headed households; less than 8 percent of all female-headed<br />

households receive input on credit from these sources. Female-headed households rely mainly on<br />

other sources of credit, MRFC, and friends. ADMARC’s input on credit seems to favor more<br />

male-headed households and farmers with larger farm sizes.<br />

Tables 5.19 and 5.20 show the average price paid for the different types of seeds and fertilizers as<br />

well as the average distance to the input source. Average distance to an input source is 6 km,<br />

which is not excessively far. About 90 percent of all input purchases are conducted by the<br />

household head.<br />

5.1.6 Changes in labor and inputs since 1995<br />

<strong>In</strong> order to capture changes in access to and use of inputs since the reforms of 1995, farmers were<br />

asked directly about changes in their use of inputs such as hired labor, family work done by<br />

women, seeds, and fertilizer, since 1995. As shown in Table 5.21, the majority of farmers<br />

reported no change in the use of these inputs. <strong>On</strong>ly about 9 percent noted a decrease in the use of<br />

hired labor or family work performed by women, whereas about one-third said that their use of<br />

women labor had increased. Also, only about 16-18 percent reported that their use of seeds or<br />

fertilizer had decreased since 1995. This indicates that input market liberalization is not perceived<br />

as having had dramatic impact on the use of labor, fertilizer or seeds by small farmers.<br />

For those who reported changes in input use, the main reason for the increase in labor use was a<br />

change in cropping pattern, whereas the main reason for the decrease in labor was blamed on the<br />

inavailability or high cost of labor. Among farmers that claimed a change in the use of purchased<br />

seeds or fertilizers, the main reason behind the decrease in use was higher prices. For those who<br />

increased their use of input, this was attributed to higher revenues from buying and applying the<br />

input. <strong>In</strong> addition, for seeds, about one-third of the farmers that increased their use of purchased<br />

seeds explained that the main reason for the increase was the higher availability of seeds since the<br />

247

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!