Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...
Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ... Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...
On average, around 20 percent of the households belong to a club and only about 5 percent are members of a cooperative or association. Clubs are smaller than associations and are made up of several farm families. They are usually initiated by the extension officers of the MOAI. Associations can be formed from a group of clubs. Clubs and associations are especially important for the production and marketing of smallholder cash crops (such as tobacco, coffee, and chillies). For example, in order to sell tobacco on the auction floor, a producer has to be registered with the Tobacco Control Commission (TCC), which assigns him/her a registration number. However, registration numbers are only given out to farms that are larger than 10 hectares. To be able to sell tobacco on the auction floor, smallholder farmers can either form a club made up of at least 10 farm families and sell their tobacco jointly as a club, or they can sell their tobacco to an intermediate buyer (IB) who in turns sells it at the floor. In Table 5.3, membership in a club or association is also disaggregated by farm size. As shown in this table, membership in a club, cooperative or association increases with farm size, which is not an unusual result. We also note from results not shown here that male-headed households are more likely to be members in a club or association than female-headed households. Of those farmers that are members of an association, female-headed households only belong to tobacco associations while about a quarter of the male-headed households are members in other associations, such as for coffee, cotton or horticultural crops. Membership in clubs or associations is also higher in the Northern region than in the Central or Southern region (37 percent of farmers in the North compared with less than 20 percent in the Center or Southern region for club membership, and 9 percent of Northern farmers compared with about 4 to 5 percent of Central or Southern farmers for membership in an association). In Table 5.4, more detailed socio-economic characteristics of the household head are disaggregated by expenditure group. The average age of a household head is 42 and the average number of years in farming is 19. Both average age and years in farming decline a little with household expenditures. This may suggest that younger farmers are a little better off than their older counterparts. As mentioned earlier, attempts were made to replicate the national gender distribution of household heads. Therefore, about 34 percent of the sample is composed of female-headed households. A higher percentage of female-headed households is found in the Southern region (42 percent versus about 24 to 26 percent in the other two regions). Female- 235
headed households seem to be more concentrated in the lowest expenditure groups, perhaps confirming the fact that they are poorer than their male counterparts. About 44 percent of the household heads cannot read or write. Table 5.4 indicates that the percentage of illiterate household heads is highest in the two poorest expenditure quintiles. However, there seems to be little difference in the level of literacy between the three other expenditure quintiles. As expected, in terms of educational attainment, farmers in the richest expenditure quintile have the highest percentage of formal education. The farm-size break-down of the educational variables shows similar trends. The regional breakdown suggests that farmers in the North have a higher level of literacy and educational attainment than farmers in the South or Centre (for example, 72 percent of household heads in the North are literate compared to about 55 percent in the other two regions). As expected, only 33 percent of the female heads are literate compared to 69 percent of the male heads. Educational attainment is also heavily biased against women as about half of the females that head their households have received no formal education while only one-fifth of their male counterpart are in a similar position. Most household heads consider farming as their main activity (93 percent); only about 4 percent classify working in the service sector as their primary activity. A higher percentage of the nonpoor households work in the service sector while a larger number of poorer households are engaged in agriculture. Additionally, whereas 99 percent of female-headed households consider farming as their main activity, 90 percent of male heads work primarily in agriculture. The most important secondary activity for female heads of households is unpaid housework (65 percent followed by food processing (22 percent). For males, the most important secondary activities are service sector employment (15 percent), or employment in construction or manufacturing (between 12 to 14 percent each). Income sources Aside from their own home production, farm households derive income from a variety of sources. Table 5.5 shows the percent of households that receive income from each type of activity as well as the contribution of each activity to the total revenue of the household. The figures indicate that more than 60 percent of households receive some income from crop sales, about 40 percent from non-farm self-employment and a little less than 40 percent from wages in 236
- Page 192 and 193: Table 4.1.142-Percent of households
- Page 194 and 195: Table 4.1.144-Food consumption by e
- Page 196 and 197: Table 4.1.149-Results of regression
- Page 198 and 199: Table 4.1.152-Value of household as
- Page 200 and 201: Table 4.1.156-Value of household as
- Page 202 and 203: Table 4.1.160-Housing characteristi
- Page 204 and 205: Table 4.1.162-Housing characteristi
- Page 206 and 207: Table 4.1.165-Main source of water
- Page 208 and 209: Table 4.1.170-Source of information
- Page 210 and 211: Table 4.1.176-Source of information
- Page 212 and 213: Table 4.1.181-Regression for percei
- Page 214 and 215: Table 4.2.5-Change in number of veh
- Page 216 and 217: Table 4.2.12-Availability and sourc
- Page 218 and 219: Table 4.2.21-Number of GFs per vill
- Page 220 and 221: Table 4.2.30-Percentage of villages
- Page 222 and 223: Table 4.2.34-Distribution of villag
- Page 224 and 225: Table 4.3.1-Distribution of GVs by
- Page 226 and 227: Table 4.3.9-Number of each type of
- Page 228 and 229: Table 4.3.12-Percentage of secretar
- Page 230 and 231: Table 4.3.19-Distribution of GVs by
- Page 232 and 233: Table 4.3.24-Percentage of inputs s
- Page 234 and 235: Table 4.3.32-Average value of curre
- Page 236 and 237: Table 4.3.40-Percentage of GVs in w
- Page 238 and 239: CHAPTER 5 - RESULTS FROM THE MALAWI
- Page 240 and 241: The weights are used to calculate a
- Page 244 and 245: agricultural work. Other less commo
- Page 246 and 247: 5.1.4 Time allocation In Malawi, as
- Page 248 and 249: attributed it to the fact that fert
- Page 250 and 251: insignificant. The coefficient on t
- Page 252 and 253: As in the results from the previous
- Page 254 and 255: most important sources of input on
- Page 256 and 257: applied for credit compared to 20 p
- Page 258 and 259: less than 1 mt per ha which are fai
- Page 260 and 261: 5.1.9 Agricultural marketing Market
- Page 262 and 263: Households that belong to a club al
- Page 264 and 265: most important contractors are the
- Page 266 and 267: indicates that the extent of povert
- Page 268 and 269: wheat, and fruits and nuts, a highe
- Page 270 and 271: Surprisingly, the education of the
- Page 272 and 273: Housing characteristics The overwhe
- Page 274 and 275: It was also important to find out w
- Page 276 and 277: Surprisingly, tobacco growers are m
- Page 278 and 279: Over three-quarter of the EPAs repo
- Page 280 and 281: The changes in the number and types
- Page 282 and 283: 5.2.11 Storage Facilities On averag
- Page 284 and 285: Table 5.2 - Household characteristi
- Page 286 and 287: Table 5.7 - Percentage of household
- Page 288 and 289: Table 5.12 - Farm labor use and all
- Page 290 and 291: Table 5.15 - Determinants of the de
headed households seem to be more concentrated in the lowest expenditure groups, perhaps<br />
confirming the fact that they are poorer than their male counterparts.<br />
About 44 percent of the household heads cannot read or write. Table 5.4 indicates that the<br />
percentage of illiterate household heads is highest in the two poorest expenditure quintiles.<br />
However, there seems to be little difference in the level of literacy between the three other<br />
expenditure quintiles. As expected, in terms of educational attainment, farmers in the richest<br />
expenditure quintile have the highest percentage of formal education. The farm-size break-down<br />
of the educational variables shows similar trends. The regional breakdown suggests that farmers<br />
in the North have a higher level of literacy and educational attainment than farmers in the South<br />
or Centre (for example, 72 percent of household heads in the North are literate compared to about<br />
55 percent in the other two regions). As expected, only 33 percent of the female heads are literate<br />
compared to 69 percent of the male heads. Educational attainment is also heavily biased against<br />
women as about half of the females that head their households have received no formal education<br />
while only one-fifth of their male counterpart are in a similar position.<br />
Most household heads consider farming as their main activity (93 percent); only about 4 percent<br />
classify working in the service sector as their primary activity. A higher percentage of the nonpoor<br />
households work in the service sector while a larger number of poorer households are<br />
engaged in agriculture. Additionally, whereas 99 percent of female-headed households consider<br />
farming as their main activity, 90 percent of male heads work primarily in agriculture. The most<br />
important secondary activity for female heads of households is unpaid housework (65 percent<br />
followed by food processing (22 percent). For males, the most important secondary activities are<br />
service sector employment (15 percent), or employment in construction or manufacturing<br />
(between 12 to 14 percent each).<br />
<strong>In</strong>come sources<br />
Aside from their own home production, farm households derive income from a variety of<br />
sources. Table 5.5 shows the percent of households that receive income from each type of<br />
activity as well as the contribution of each activity to the total revenue of the household. The<br />
figures indicate that more than 60 percent of households receive some income from crop sales,<br />
about 40 percent from non-farm self-employment and a little less than 40 percent from wages in<br />
236