Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ... Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

ifpri.cgiar.org
from ifpri.cgiar.org More from this publisher
23.01.2014 Views

On average, around 20 percent of the households belong to a club and only about 5 percent are members of a cooperative or association. Clubs are smaller than associations and are made up of several farm families. They are usually initiated by the extension officers of the MOAI. Associations can be formed from a group of clubs. Clubs and associations are especially important for the production and marketing of smallholder cash crops (such as tobacco, coffee, and chillies). For example, in order to sell tobacco on the auction floor, a producer has to be registered with the Tobacco Control Commission (TCC), which assigns him/her a registration number. However, registration numbers are only given out to farms that are larger than 10 hectares. To be able to sell tobacco on the auction floor, smallholder farmers can either form a club made up of at least 10 farm families and sell their tobacco jointly as a club, or they can sell their tobacco to an intermediate buyer (IB) who in turns sells it at the floor. In Table 5.3, membership in a club or association is also disaggregated by farm size. As shown in this table, membership in a club, cooperative or association increases with farm size, which is not an unusual result. We also note from results not shown here that male-headed households are more likely to be members in a club or association than female-headed households. Of those farmers that are members of an association, female-headed households only belong to tobacco associations while about a quarter of the male-headed households are members in other associations, such as for coffee, cotton or horticultural crops. Membership in clubs or associations is also higher in the Northern region than in the Central or Southern region (37 percent of farmers in the North compared with less than 20 percent in the Center or Southern region for club membership, and 9 percent of Northern farmers compared with about 4 to 5 percent of Central or Southern farmers for membership in an association). In Table 5.4, more detailed socio-economic characteristics of the household head are disaggregated by expenditure group. The average age of a household head is 42 and the average number of years in farming is 19. Both average age and years in farming decline a little with household expenditures. This may suggest that younger farmers are a little better off than their older counterparts. As mentioned earlier, attempts were made to replicate the national gender distribution of household heads. Therefore, about 34 percent of the sample is composed of female-headed households. A higher percentage of female-headed households is found in the Southern region (42 percent versus about 24 to 26 percent in the other two regions). Female- 235

headed households seem to be more concentrated in the lowest expenditure groups, perhaps confirming the fact that they are poorer than their male counterparts. About 44 percent of the household heads cannot read or write. Table 5.4 indicates that the percentage of illiterate household heads is highest in the two poorest expenditure quintiles. However, there seems to be little difference in the level of literacy between the three other expenditure quintiles. As expected, in terms of educational attainment, farmers in the richest expenditure quintile have the highest percentage of formal education. The farm-size break-down of the educational variables shows similar trends. The regional breakdown suggests that farmers in the North have a higher level of literacy and educational attainment than farmers in the South or Centre (for example, 72 percent of household heads in the North are literate compared to about 55 percent in the other two regions). As expected, only 33 percent of the female heads are literate compared to 69 percent of the male heads. Educational attainment is also heavily biased against women as about half of the females that head their households have received no formal education while only one-fifth of their male counterpart are in a similar position. Most household heads consider farming as their main activity (93 percent); only about 4 percent classify working in the service sector as their primary activity. A higher percentage of the nonpoor households work in the service sector while a larger number of poorer households are engaged in agriculture. Additionally, whereas 99 percent of female-headed households consider farming as their main activity, 90 percent of male heads work primarily in agriculture. The most important secondary activity for female heads of households is unpaid housework (65 percent followed by food processing (22 percent). For males, the most important secondary activities are service sector employment (15 percent), or employment in construction or manufacturing (between 12 to 14 percent each). Income sources Aside from their own home production, farm households derive income from a variety of sources. Table 5.5 shows the percent of households that receive income from each type of activity as well as the contribution of each activity to the total revenue of the household. The figures indicate that more than 60 percent of households receive some income from crop sales, about 40 percent from non-farm self-employment and a little less than 40 percent from wages in 236

headed households seem to be more concentrated in the lowest expenditure groups, perhaps<br />

confirming the fact that they are poorer than their male counterparts.<br />

About 44 percent of the household heads cannot read or write. Table 5.4 indicates that the<br />

percentage of illiterate household heads is highest in the two poorest expenditure quintiles.<br />

However, there seems to be little difference in the level of literacy between the three other<br />

expenditure quintiles. As expected, in terms of educational attainment, farmers in the richest<br />

expenditure quintile have the highest percentage of formal education. The farm-size break-down<br />

of the educational variables shows similar trends. The regional breakdown suggests that farmers<br />

in the North have a higher level of literacy and educational attainment than farmers in the South<br />

or Centre (for example, 72 percent of household heads in the North are literate compared to about<br />

55 percent in the other two regions). As expected, only 33 percent of the female heads are literate<br />

compared to 69 percent of the male heads. Educational attainment is also heavily biased against<br />

women as about half of the females that head their households have received no formal education<br />

while only one-fifth of their male counterpart are in a similar position.<br />

Most household heads consider farming as their main activity (93 percent); only about 4 percent<br />

classify working in the service sector as their primary activity. A higher percentage of the nonpoor<br />

households work in the service sector while a larger number of poorer households are<br />

engaged in agriculture. Additionally, whereas 99 percent of female-headed households consider<br />

farming as their main activity, 90 percent of male heads work primarily in agriculture. The most<br />

important secondary activity for female heads of households is unpaid housework (65 percent<br />

followed by food processing (22 percent). For males, the most important secondary activities are<br />

service sector employment (15 percent), or employment in construction or manufacturing<br />

(between 12 to 14 percent each).<br />

<strong>In</strong>come sources<br />

Aside from their own home production, farm households derive income from a variety of<br />

sources. Table 5.5 shows the percent of households that receive income from each type of<br />

activity as well as the contribution of each activity to the total revenue of the household. The<br />

figures indicate that more than 60 percent of households receive some income from crop sales,<br />

about 40 percent from non-farm self-employment and a little less than 40 percent from wages in<br />

236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!