Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ... Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

ifpri.cgiar.org
from ifpri.cgiar.org More from this publisher
23.01.2014 Views

The weights are used to calculate averages, percentages, and sums throughout the report. They compensate for the fact that some regions or household types are over-represented in the sample relative to the population, while others are under-represented. Questionnaire The survey used a 27-page pre-coded questionnaire, designed by IFPRI, the Agricultural Policy Research Unit (APRU) at Bunda College of Agriculture, and its collaborators. It was revised following three field tests. The questionnaire was composed of 16 sections: household member characteristics, household characteristics, land use and cropping patterns, crop production, source of labor and labor use, input use and purchases (fertilizers, manure, seeds, pesticides), changes in labor and inputs, credit use and source, crop sales and marketing, storage, sources of information, consumption (food and non-food), time allocation, inventory of assets (household and agricultural), sources of income, and farmers’ perceptions. Data collection The IFPRI/APRU Smallholder Farmer Survey employed a team of seven enumerators and two supervisors. The enumerators were selected from a group of bachelor level students who had some experience conducting household-level surveys. The survey team was directed and supervised by Mr. Richard Kachule from APRU. The enumerators were trained for two weeks in which every section of the questionnaire was reviewed and explained. The training also included three field trips to pre-test the questionnaire, practice using it, and identify potential problems. A manual was prepared to guide the enumerators in completing the questionnaire, defining key terms, and deciding difficult cases. The supervisors were also trained on how to randomly select the villages and households to include in the sample. Data collection took place from August to early November 1998. 5.1.2 Farm household characteristics and income sources This section describes the basic socio-economic characteristics of the smallholder farm household members and their sources of income. The statistical results are disaggregated either by region, total annual household expenditures per capita (which include food and non-food 233

expenditures as well as the rental value of the residence), farm size per household, or gender of the household head. The regional breakdown includes the North, the Center, and the South. Total household expenditures are grouped into five quintiles. Each quintile groups 20 percent of the households (or 160 households) in a separate expenditure category. For example, the lowest quintile represents the 160 poorest households (those that have the smallest value of annual expenditures per capita) while the upper quintile is made up of the 160 richest households. The average value of total per capita expenditures of each expenditure quintile is presented at the top of Table 5.2. It ranges from MK 1,079for the lowest expenditure quintile to MK 6,550 for the wealthiest group. 29 Average total per capita expenditures for all households are MK 3,083. Similar to the expenditures quintiles described earlier, farm households are grouped into five categories according to farm size, with the first quintile representing the households with the smallest farms (0.5 ha on average) and the fifth quintile representing those with the largest farms (3.0 ha on average.) Socio-economic characteristics Analysis of the smallholder farmer data indicates that average household size is about 5 with an average number of 2 to 3 children per household (see Table 5.2). Household size decreases with per capita expenditures as the poorest households have an average of 6 members while the richest have an average of 4. Table 5.2 also shows the breakdown of the household heads of each family by ethnic group and religious affiliation. Results show that ethnic group composition in Malawi is fairly diverse although ethnic groups have a distinct geographical distribution. The Chewa, which are the largest ethnic group representing a little more than onethird of the farm household heads in Malawi, are mainly found in the Center. The Tumbuka are largely present in the North, while the Yawo and Lomwe are concentrated in the South. More than three-quarter of farm household heads are Christians whereas less than one-fifth are Moslem. Moslems are more concentrated in the Southern region of Malawi while the North has the highest concentration of Christians. The distribution of ethnic groups and religious background by expenditure category does not show any definite trend in terms of one group being richer than the other. 29 It is difficult to convert these numbers into US dollar because the Malawian Kwacha was devalued several times during the period 1997/98, increasing from 15 MK/US$ in 1997 to 42 MK/US$ at the end of 1998. 234

expenditures as well as the rental value of the residence), farm size per household, or gender of<br />

the household head. The regional breakdown includes the North, the Center, and the South.<br />

Total household expenditures are grouped into five quintiles. Each quintile groups 20 percent of<br />

the households (or 160 households) in a separate expenditure category. For example, the lowest<br />

quintile represents the 160 poorest households (those that have the smallest value of annual<br />

expenditures per capita) while the upper quintile is made up of the 160 richest households. The<br />

average value of total per capita expenditures of each expenditure quintile is presented at the top<br />

of Table 5.2. It ranges from MK 1,079for the lowest expenditure quintile to MK 6,550 for the<br />

wealthiest group. 29 Average total per capita expenditures for all households are MK 3,083.<br />

Similar to the expenditures quintiles described earlier, farm households are grouped into five<br />

categories according to farm size, with the first quintile representing the households with the<br />

smallest farms (0.5 ha on average) and the fifth quintile representing those with the largest farms<br />

(3.0 ha on average.)<br />

Socio-economic characteristics<br />

Analysis of the smallholder farmer data indicates that average household size is about 5<br />

with an average number of 2 to 3 children per household (see Table 5.2). Household size<br />

decreases with per capita expenditures as the poorest households have an average of 6 members<br />

while the richest have an average of 4. Table 5.2 also shows the breakdown of the household<br />

heads of each family by ethnic group and religious affiliation. Results show that ethnic group<br />

composition in Malawi is fairly diverse although ethnic groups have a distinct geographical<br />

distribution. The Chewa, which are the largest ethnic group representing a little more than onethird<br />

of the farm household heads in Malawi, are mainly found in the Center. The Tumbuka are<br />

largely present in the North, while the Yawo and Lomwe are concentrated in the South. More<br />

than three-quarter of farm household heads are Christians whereas less than one-fifth are Moslem.<br />

Moslems are more concentrated in the Southern region of Malawi while the North has the highest<br />

concentration of Christians. The distribution of ethnic groups and religious background by<br />

expenditure category does not show any definite trend in terms of one group being richer than the<br />

other.<br />

29 It is difficult to convert these numbers into US dollar because the Malawian Kwacha was devalued<br />

several times during the period 1997/98, increasing from 15 MK/US$ in 1997 to 42 MK/US$ at the end of<br />

1998.<br />

234

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!