Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL MARKET REFORMS ON SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN BENIN AND MALAWI Project Number 97.7860.6-001.00 IFPRI Collaborative Research Project ________________________________________________________________________ FINAL REPORT VOLUME 1 by Mylène Kherallah Nicholas Minot Richard Kachule Bio Goura Soule Philippe Berry Submitted to the Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Technische Zussammenarbeit (GTZ) February 2001 A Collaborative Research Project between the International Food Policy Research Institute, the University of Hohenheim, and Collaborating African Institutions
Page 1: IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL MARKET REFOR
Page 5 and 6: 4.1.10 Sources of information......
Page 7 and 8: Tables Chapter 4 Sections 4.1-4.3..
Page 9 and 10: constraints that farmers and trader
Page 11 and 12: Malawi, focusing on the reforms tha
Page 13 and 14: This chapter provides a brief descr
Page 15 and 16: marketing in specific sectors: the
Page 17 and 18: In 1988-89, the entire state-owned
Page 19 and 20: Two options for liberalization of t
Page 21 and 22: In addition to CLCAM, there is a gr
Page 23 and 24: Input use Fertilizer and pesticide
Page 25 and 26: FCFA/adult equivalent/year, 69 perc
Page 27 and 28: Table 2.1 - Trends in maize prices
Page 30 and 31: CHAPTER 3 - BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
Page 32 and 33: In 1986, Malawi’s economy deterio
Page 34 and 35: high population growth (about 2.4 p
Page 36 and 37: questionable since they are support
Page 38: Table 3.2 CROP 1982/83 1983/84 1984
Page 41 and 42: Household characteristics Housing c
Page 43 and 44: living from crop and livestock prod
Page 45 and 46: If we focus our attention on the he
Page 47 and 48: eported being a cooperative member.
Page 49 and 50: little or no costs) and a smaller i
Page 51 and 52: are highest among small farms and h
Page 53 and 54:
Farmers were also asked how they ob
Page 55 and 56:
household work (including cooking,
Page 57 and 58:
paying work in the informal sector.
Page 59 and 60:
Seed purchase patterns Almost all p
Page 61 and 62:
It is interesting to note that the
Page 63 and 64:
Perhaps the strongest factor determ
Page 65 and 66:
omitted crops include sorghum, mill
Page 67 and 68:
Finally, if we divided the farm hou
Page 69 and 70:
FCFA/farm. The percentage of grower
Page 71 and 72:
Labor use is quite different across
Page 73 and 74:
are involved in all activities, but
Page 75 and 76:
Agricultural assets The ownership o
Page 77 and 78:
The purpose of this section is not
Page 79 and 80:
households. The only clear patterns
Page 81 and 82:
Bénin is characterized by semi-sub
Page 83 and 84:
sorghum/millet output of Borgou is
Page 85 and 86:
sold on the market. Nonetheless, th
Page 87 and 88:
May 16 (see Table 4.1.118). The com
Page 89 and 90:
involved in buying crops in a given
Page 91 and 92:
The grenier or cabane is an indepen
Page 93 and 94:
percent, while the proportion of cr
Page 95 and 96:
largest farms. This implies that ho
Page 97 and 98:
meat, and the small share allocated
Page 99 and 100:
identifies the variables that are m
Page 101 and 102:
make the results from the IFPRI-LAR
Page 103 and 104:
farm households in Benin (95 percen
Page 105 and 106:
With regard to the floors, the hous
Page 107 and 108:
agricultural production and marketi
Page 109 and 110:
Agricultural markets Friends and fa
Page 111 and 112:
that higher values of the independe
Page 113 and 114:
The questionnaire was developed by
Page 115 and 116:
Current patterns On average, rural
Page 117 and 118:
credit, while another third of the
Page 119 and 120:
According to village leaders, howev
Page 121 and 122:
estimates of the area planted to ma
Page 123 and 124:
In the case of manioc, most of the
Page 125 and 126:
Although inputs are imported by pri
Page 127 and 128:
All or almost all the GVs in the sa
Page 129 and 130:
4.3.5 Assets In general, the only p
Page 131 and 132:
fact that farms, and hence the area
Page 133 and 134:
available credit from this source i
Page 135 and 136:
Input quality GV representatives we
Page 137 and 138:
are grading and weighing the cotton
Page 139 and 140:
Table 4.1.4-Household characteristi
Page 141 and 142:
Table 4.1.10-School attendance by a
Page 143 and 144:
Table 4.1.17-Main activity of head
Page 145 and 146:
Table 4.1.22-Share of income from e
Page 147 and 148:
Table 4.1.28-Number of plots and ar
Page 149 and 150:
Table 4.1.35-Allocation of labor by
Page 151 and 152:
Table 4.1.39-Change in labor alloca
Page 153 and 154:
Table 4.1.44-Share of producers of
Page 155 and 156:
Table 4.1.51-Change in use of purch
Page 157 and 158:
Table 4.1.56-Fertilizer use by depa
Page 159 and 160:
Table 4.1.62-Characteristics of fer
Page 161 and 162:
Table 4.1.67-Perceived change in av
Page 163 and 164:
Table 4.1.72-Pesticide use by depar
Page 165 and 166:
Table 4.1.78-Share of each type of
Page 167 and 168:
Table 4.1.86-Souce of loan by sex o
Page 169 and 170:
Table 4.1.92-Percent of households
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Table 4.1.100-Summary of production
Page 175 and 176:
Table 4.1.104-Area allocation by cr
Page 177 and 178:
Table 4.1.108-Area allocation by cr
Page 179 and 180:
Table 4.1.112-Marketed share of out
Page 181 and 182:
Table 4.1.116-Descriptive statistic
Page 183 and 184:
Table 4.1.118-Distribution of sales
Page 185 and 186:
Table 4.1.124-Perceived change in v
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Table 4.1.138-Summary of expenditur
Page 191 and 192:
Table 4.1.141-Food consumption by s
Page 193 and 194:
Table 4.1.143-Food consumption by d
Page 195 and 196:
Table 4.1.146-Non-food expenditures
Page 197 and 198:
Table 4.1.150-Measures of poverty f
Page 199 and 200:
Table 4.1.154-Value of household as
Page 201 and 202:
Table 4.1.158-Value of household as
Page 203 and 204:
Table 4.1.161-Housing characteristi
Page 205 and 206:
Table 4.1.163-Main source of water
Page 207 and 208:
Table 4.1.167-Frequency and nature
Page 209 and 210:
Table 4.1.173-Source of information
Page 211 and 212:
Table 4.1.180-Main reason for the i
Page 213 and 214:
Table 4.2.1-Road infrastructure Reg
Page 215 and 216:
Table 4.2.8-Frequency of closest ma
Page 217 and 218:
Table 4.2.16-Share of village maize
Page 219 and 220:
Table 4.2.26-Change in availability
Page 221 and 222:
Table 4.2.33-Commodity balance in e
Page 223 and 224:
Table 4.2.35-Change in production o
Page 225 and 226:
Table 4.3.5-Number of members at st
Page 227 and 228:
Table 4.3.11-Descriptive statistics
Page 229 and 230:
Table 4.3.16-Distribution of GVs by
Page 231 and 232:
Table 4.3.20-Percent of GVs satisif
Page 233 and 234:
Table 4.3.28-Characteristics of cot
Page 235 and 236:
Table 4.3.36-Percent of revenue fro
Page 237 and 238:
Table 4.3.44-Opinion of changes in
Page 239 and 240:
participate in the survey or if the
Page 241 and 242:
expenditures as well as the rental
Page 243 and 244:
headed households seem to be more c
Page 245 and 246:
size is 1.4 ha. The largest farms a
Page 247 and 248:
consuming family labor activities f
Page 249 and 250:
Table 5.14 provides a definition an
Page 251 and 252:
suggests that farmers in remote are
Page 253 and 254:
which as we mentioned earlier, is a
Page 255 and 256:
eforms. These last two findings sug
Page 257 and 258:
share of tobacco and non-tobacco gr
Page 259 and 260:
the main storage space. Pits are mo
Page 261 and 262:
heavily controlled by household hea
Page 263 and 264:
ADMARC captures another 17 percent,
Page 265 and 266:
Overall expenditure patterns Accord
Page 267 and 268:
vegetables and legumes, dairy produ
Page 269 and 270:
This is followed by clothing (17 pe
Page 271 and 272:
5.1.11 Household assets and housing
Page 273 and 274:
information on agricultural input u
Page 275 and 276:
off) and earning more money from no
Page 277 and 278:
5.2.2 General information In genera
Page 279 and 280:
5.2.5 Transportation Services Table
Page 281 and 282:
The most common fertilizers distrib
Page 283 and 284:
Table 5.1 - IFPRI/APRU Smallholder
Page 285 and 286:
Table 5.5 - Sources of income and i
Page 287 and 288:
Table 5.9 - Farm Characteristics by
Page 289 and 290:
Table 5.14 - Descriptive statistics
Page 291 and 292:
Table 5.16 - Determinants of quanti
Page 293 and 294:
Table 5.20 - Average price paid by
Page 295 and 296:
Table 5.23 - Ownership of agricultu
Page 297 and 298:
Table 5.27 - Percent of households
Page 299 and 300:
Table 5.32 - Use of storage facilit
Page 301 and 302:
Table 5.36 - Distribution of househ
Page 303 and 304:
Table 5.39 - Percent use of types o
Page 305 and 306:
Table 5.44 - Summary of food expend
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Table 5.48 - Food consumption by re
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Table 5.53 - Non-food expenditure p
Page 315 and 316:
Television,VCR 1 0.0 1.0 0.0 7 919
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Table 5.63 - Perceptions about chan
Page 321 and 322:
Table 5.69 - General information fo
Page 323 and 324:
Table 5.74 - Availability of transp
Page 325 and 326:
Table 5.78 - Changes in the number
Page 327 and 328:
Figure 5.3 - Percentage of househol
Page 329 and 330:
322
Page 331 and 332:
Land use The average farm size
Page 333 and 334:
Crop production and storage Maize
Page 335 and 336:
Poor households devote a larger sha
Page 337 and 338:
Perceived problems of GVs Few GVs
Page 339 and 340:
For manioc, most of the surplus vil
Page 341 and 342:
Furthermore, the system facilitates
Page 343 and 344:
Address problems of corruption in w
Page 345 and 346:
Household Characteristics and Incom
Page 347 and 348:
Use of credit A little less than
Page 349 and 350:
About 62 percent of the households
Page 351 and 352:
of credit use highlights a market f
Page 353 and 354:
ecause reforms have also been accom
Page 355 and 356:
348
Page 357:
National Economic Council (NEC). 19
show all

Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?