Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...
Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ... Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...
Table 4.1.120-Change in the type of buyer since 1992 by crop Sorghum/ More sales to: Maize millet Cowpeas Manioc Yams Cotton Other Total Private traders 11% 30% 15% 6% 16% 0% 15% 13% SONAPRA 0% 0% 0% 0% Mills 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Coop/GV 0% 0% Friends/familiy 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 1% 0% Others 0% 1% 2% 5% 4% 2% No change 88% 69% 84% 91% 76% 100% 80% 85% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Source: IFPRI/LARES Small Farmer Survey. Table 4.1.121-Perceived change in number of buyers of crops by department Department Atacora Atlantique Borgou Mono Ouémé Zou Total Better 86% 2% 73% 20% 76% 47% 51% No change 1% 89% 12% 65% 5% 20% 30% Worse 1% 4% 0% 7% 28% 8% No opinion 7% 4% 9% 9% 3% 3% 6% Not applicable 6% 6% 3% 5% 9% 2% 5% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Source: IFPRI/LARES Small Farmer Survey. Table 4.1.122-Perceived change in number of buyers of crops by sex of head Sex of household head Male Female Total Better 51% 44% 51% No change 30% 37% 30% Worse 8% 12% 8% No opinion 6% 4% 6% Not applicable 5% 2% 5% Total 100% 100% 100% Source: IFPRI/LARES Small Farmer Survey. Table 4.1.123-Perceived change in number of buyers of crops by expenditure category Expenditure category (quintile) Poorest 2 3 4 Richest Total Better 62% 58% 54% 44% 36% 51% No change 27% 27% 29% 35% 33% 30% Worse 2% 6% 7% 10% 16% 8% No opinion 7% 3% 7% 6% 6% 6% Not applicable 2% 6% 4% 5% 8% 5% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Source: IFPRI/LARES Small Farmer Survey. 177
Table 4.1.124-Perceived change in volatility of crop prices by department Department Atacora Atlantique Borgou Mono Ouémé Zou Total Better 78% 2% 41% 6% 13% 31% 27% No change 5% 36% 31% 79% 66% 30% 43% Worse 2% 2% 4% 4% 8% 32% 10% No opinion 10% 54% 22% 6% 4% 5% 15% Not applicable 6% 6% 3% 5% 9% 2% 5% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Source: IFPRI/LARES Small Farmer Survey. Table 4.1.125-Perceived change in volatility of crop prices by expenditure category Expenditure category (quintile) Poorest 2 3 4 Richest Total Better 35% 33% 33% 25% 12% 27% No change 42% 47% 47% 39% 38% 43% Worse 5% 8% 5% 15% 19% 10% No opinion 16% 7% 11% 15% 23% 15% Not applicable 2% 6% 4% 5% 8% 5% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Source: IFPRI/LARES Small Farmer Survey. Table 4.1.126-Perceived change in availability of market information by department Department Atacora Atlantique Borgou Mono Ouémé Zou Total Better 86% 2% 42% 38% 42% 22% 37% No change 3% 76% 37% 54% 46% 42% 43% Worse 1% 0% 5% 1% 31% 8% No opinion 4% 16% 14% 2% 3% 3% 6% Not applicable 6% 6% 3% 5% 9% 2% 5% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Source: IFPRI/LARES Small Farmer Survey. Table 4.1.127-Perceived change in road conditions by department Department Atacora Atlantique Borgou Mono Ouémé Zou Total Better 72% 0% 23% 49% 33% 13% 31% No change 6% 0% 19% 33% 30% 39% 24% Worse 18% 92% 54% 12% 26% 46% 40% No opinion 2% 1% 0% 6% 1% 2% Not applicable 4% 6% 3% 5% 5% 2% 4% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Source: IFPRI/LARES Small Farmer Survey. 178
- Page 134 and 135: The largest cost items are schools
- Page 136 and 137: members and 10 percent of the membe
- Page 138 and 139: Table 4.1.1-Description of sample o
- Page 140 and 141: Table 4.1.7-Age, education, and lit
- Page 142 and 143: Table 4.1.13-Ethnic background of h
- Page 144 and 145: Table 4.1.19-Importance of each sou
- Page 146 and 147: Table 4.1.25-Number of plots and ar
- Page 148 and 149: Table 4.1.31-Land tenure by expendi
- Page 150 and 151: Table 4.1.37-Change in labor alloca
- Page 152 and 153: Table 4.1.42-Seed use by sex of hea
- Page 154 and 155: Table 4.1.47-Perceived change in av
- Page 156 and 157: Table 4.1.54-Share of producers of
- Page 158 and 159: Table 4.1.59-Fertilizer use by farm
- Page 160 and 161: Table 4.1.64-Characteristics of fer
- Page 162 and 163: Table 4.1.69-Change in fertilizer a
- Page 164 and 165: Table 4.1.75-Allocation of labor by
- Page 166 and 167: Table 4.1.82-Allocation of labor by
- Page 168 and 169: Table 4.1.89-Change in credit avail
- Page 170 and 171: Table 4.1.94-Percent of households
- Page 172 and 173: Table 4.1.98-Percent of households
- Page 174 and 175: Table 4.1.102-Area allocation by cr
- Page 176 and 177: Table 4.1.106-Area allocation by cr
- Page 178 and 179: Table 4.1.110-Marketed share of out
- Page 180 and 181: Table 4.1.114-Marketed share of out
- Page 182 and 183: Table 4.1.117-Regression for market
- Page 186 and 187: Table 4.1.128-Perceived change in r
- Page 188 and 189: Table 4.1.135-Main reason for stori
- Page 190 and 191: Table 4.1.140-Summary of food expen
- Page 192 and 193: Table 4.1.142-Percent of households
- Page 194 and 195: Table 4.1.144-Food consumption by e
- Page 196 and 197: Table 4.1.149-Results of regression
- Page 198 and 199: Table 4.1.152-Value of household as
- Page 200 and 201: Table 4.1.156-Value of household as
- Page 202 and 203: Table 4.1.160-Housing characteristi
- Page 204 and 205: Table 4.1.162-Housing characteristi
- Page 206 and 207: Table 4.1.165-Main source of water
- Page 208 and 209: Table 4.1.170-Source of information
- Page 210 and 211: Table 4.1.176-Source of information
- Page 212 and 213: Table 4.1.181-Regression for percei
- Page 214 and 215: Table 4.2.5-Change in number of veh
- Page 216 and 217: Table 4.2.12-Availability and sourc
- Page 218 and 219: Table 4.2.21-Number of GFs per vill
- Page 220 and 221: Table 4.2.30-Percentage of villages
- Page 222 and 223: Table 4.2.34-Distribution of villag
- Page 224 and 225: Table 4.3.1-Distribution of GVs by
- Page 226 and 227: Table 4.3.9-Number of each type of
- Page 228 and 229: Table 4.3.12-Percentage of secretar
- Page 230 and 231: Table 4.3.19-Distribution of GVs by
- Page 232 and 233: Table 4.3.24-Percentage of inputs s
Table 4.1.120-Change in the type of buyer since 1992 by crop<br />
Sorghum/<br />
More sales to: Maize millet Cowpeas Manioc Yams Cotton Other Total<br />
Private traders 11% 30% 15% 6% 16% 0% 15% 13%<br />
SONAPRA 0% 0% 0% 0%<br />
Mills 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%<br />
Coop/GV 0% 0%<br />
Friends/familiy 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 1% 0%<br />
Others 0% 1% 2% 5% 4% 2%<br />
No change 88% 69% 84% 91% 76% 100% 80% 85%<br />
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%<br />
Source: IFPRI/LARES Small Farmer Survey.<br />
Table 4.1.121-Perceived change in number of buyers of crops by department<br />
Department<br />
Atacora Atlantique Borgou Mono Ouémé Zou Total<br />
Better 86% 2% 73% 20% 76% 47% 51%<br />
No change 1% 89% 12% 65% 5% 20% 30%<br />
Worse 1% 4% 0% 7% 28% 8%<br />
No opinion 7% 4% 9% 9% 3% 3% 6%<br />
Not applicable 6% 6% 3% 5% 9% 2% 5%<br />
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%<br />
Source: IFPRI/LARES Small Farmer Survey.<br />
Table 4.1.122-Perceived change in number of buyers of crops by sex of head<br />
Sex of household head<br />
Male Female Total<br />
Better 51% 44% 51%<br />
No change 30% 37% 30%<br />
Worse 8% 12% 8%<br />
No opinion 6% 4% 6%<br />
Not applicable 5% 2% 5%<br />
Total 100% 100% 100%<br />
Source: IFPRI/LARES Small Farmer Survey.<br />
Table 4.1.123-Perceived change in number of buyers of crops by expenditure category<br />
Expenditure category (quintile)<br />
Poorest 2 3 4 Richest Total<br />
Better 62% 58% 54% 44% 36% 51%<br />
No change 27% 27% 29% 35% 33% 30%<br />
Worse 2% 6% 7% 10% 16% 8%<br />
No opinion 7% 3% 7% 6% 6% 6%<br />
Not applicable 2% 6% 4% 5% 8% 5%<br />
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%<br />
Source: IFPRI/LARES Small Farmer Survey.<br />
177