Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...
Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ... Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...
Table 4.1.59-Fertilizer use by farm size category Farm size category (quintile) Smallest 2 3 4 Largest Total Quantity (kg/farm) 45 88 143 275 662 243 Pct. households using fertilizer 31% 36% 48% 57% 75% 50% Quantity among users (kg/farm) 144 242 296 483 879 491 Price (FCFA/kg) 172 183 181 189 188 184 Cost among users (FCFA/farm) 24,139 45,270 53,746 90,874 165,678 91,648 Intensity (kg/ha) 73 42 45 53 63 56 Intensity among users (kg/ha) 251 116 95 93 83 91 Source: IFPRI-LARES Small Farmer Survey. Note: Intensity refers to the amount of fertilizer per hectare of sown land Table 4.1.60-Fertilizer use for cotton growers and other farmers Cotton growers Other farmers Total Quantity (kg/farm) 601 50 243 Pct. households using fertilizer 97% 24% 50% Quantity among users (kg/farm) 617 213 491 Price (FCFA/kg) 188 174 184 Cost among users (FCFA/farm) 116,234 37,156 91,648 Intensity (kg/ha) 92 16 56 Intensity among users (kg/ha) 94 75 91 Source: IFPRI-LARES Small Farmer Survey. Note: Intensity refers to the amount of fertilizer per hectare of sown land Table 4.1.61-Characteristics of fertilizer purchases by department Department Atacora Atlantique Borgou Mono Ouémé Zou Total Distance (km) 5.0 7.0 2.3 15.9 6.5 2.1 6.5 Supplier Farmer 1% . 1% 13% . 2% 3% Trader 3% . . 27% 5% 0% 3% CARDER 5% 92% . 2% 88% 1% 6% GV/SONAPRA 92% 8% 99% 58% 7% 97% 88% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Payment Cash 9% 100% 2% 41% 99% 5% 14% Credit 89% . 98% 59% 1% 95% 86% Other 2% . . . . 0% 0% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Credit CARDER 1% 1% 1% GV-USPP 97% 100% 92% 3% 98% 93% Other formal lender 1% 2% 65% 3% Informal lender 1% 0% 6% 31% 1% 3% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Source: IFPRI-LARES Small Farmer Survey. 151
Table 4.1.62-Characteristics of fertilizer purchases by sex of head Sex of household head Male Female Total Distance (km) 6.7 2.4 6.5 Supplier Farmer 3% 0% 3% Trader 3% 0% 3% CARDER 7% 1% 6% GV/SONAPRA 87% 99% 88% Total 100% 100% 100% Payment Cash 14% 5% 14% Credit 86% 95% 86% Other 0% 0% 0% Total 100% 100% 100% Credit CARDER 1% 1% 1% GV-USPP 93% 95% 93% Other formal lender 3% 2% 3% Informal lender 3% 1% 3% Total 100% 100% 100% Source: IFPRI-LARES Small Farmer Survey. Table 4.1.63-Characteristics of fertilizer purchases by expenditure category Expenditure category (quintile) Poorest 2 3 4 Richest Total Distance (km) 5.6 4.5 5.2 7.6 9.3 6.5 Supplier Farmer 3% 3% 2% 4% 1% 3% Trader 2% 3% 5% 2% 4% 3% CARDER 6% 5% 3% 2% 16% 6% GV/SONAPRA 90% 90% 90% 92% 79% 88% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Payment Cash 10% 8% 9% 12% 23% 14% Credit 90% 91% 91% 88% 77% 86% Other 0% 1% 0% . . 0% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Credit CARDER 0% 3% 1% GV-USPP 90% 93% 97% 99% 86% 93% Other formal lender 6% 1% 1% 10% 3% Informal lender 3% 2% 3% 1% 5% 3% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Source: IFPRI-LARES Small Farmer Survey. 152
- Page 108 and 109: headed household were more likely t
- Page 110 and 111: Households in every expenditure cat
- Page 112 and 113: An important result of this analysi
- Page 114 and 115: oad network, although those citing
- Page 116 and 117: questions posed by the IFPRI-LARES
- Page 118 and 119: With regard to cotton marketing, al
- Page 120 and 121: Village leaders were asked to ident
- Page 122 and 123: Marketing patterns Village leaders
- Page 124 and 125: 4.3: Results of the Bénin Survey o
- Page 126 and 127: 4.3.2 Survey methods At the time of
- Page 128 and 129: officers have CM2 certificates. Thi
- Page 130 and 131: Suppliers The GV representatives we
- Page 132 and 133: Cotton area per GV ranges from 145
- Page 134 and 135: The largest cost items are schools
- Page 136 and 137: members and 10 percent of the membe
- Page 138 and 139: Table 4.1.1-Description of sample o
- Page 140 and 141: Table 4.1.7-Age, education, and lit
- Page 142 and 143: Table 4.1.13-Ethnic background of h
- Page 144 and 145: Table 4.1.19-Importance of each sou
- Page 146 and 147: Table 4.1.25-Number of plots and ar
- Page 148 and 149: Table 4.1.31-Land tenure by expendi
- Page 150 and 151: Table 4.1.37-Change in labor alloca
- Page 152 and 153: Table 4.1.42-Seed use by sex of hea
- Page 154 and 155: Table 4.1.47-Perceived change in av
- Page 156 and 157: Table 4.1.54-Share of producers of
- Page 160 and 161: Table 4.1.64-Characteristics of fer
- Page 162 and 163: Table 4.1.69-Change in fertilizer a
- Page 164 and 165: Table 4.1.75-Allocation of labor by
- Page 166 and 167: Table 4.1.82-Allocation of labor by
- Page 168 and 169: Table 4.1.89-Change in credit avail
- Page 170 and 171: Table 4.1.94-Percent of households
- Page 172 and 173: Table 4.1.98-Percent of households
- Page 174 and 175: Table 4.1.102-Area allocation by cr
- Page 176 and 177: Table 4.1.106-Area allocation by cr
- Page 178 and 179: Table 4.1.110-Marketed share of out
- Page 180 and 181: Table 4.1.114-Marketed share of out
- Page 182 and 183: Table 4.1.117-Regression for market
- Page 184 and 185: Table 4.1.120-Change in the type of
- Page 186 and 187: Table 4.1.128-Perceived change in r
- Page 188 and 189: Table 4.1.135-Main reason for stori
- Page 190 and 191: Table 4.1.140-Summary of food expen
- Page 192 and 193: Table 4.1.142-Percent of households
- Page 194 and 195: Table 4.1.144-Food consumption by e
- Page 196 and 197: Table 4.1.149-Results of regression
- Page 198 and 199: Table 4.1.152-Value of household as
- Page 200 and 201: Table 4.1.156-Value of household as
- Page 202 and 203: Table 4.1.160-Housing characteristi
- Page 204 and 205: Table 4.1.162-Housing characteristi
- Page 206 and 207: Table 4.1.165-Main source of water
Table 4.1.62-Characteristics of fertilizer purchases by sex of head<br />
Sex of household head<br />
Male Female Total<br />
Distance (km) 6.7 2.4 6.5<br />
Supplier Farmer 3% 0% 3%<br />
Trader 3% 0% 3%<br />
CARDER 7% 1% 6%<br />
GV/SONAPRA 87% 99% 88%<br />
Total 100% 100% 100%<br />
Payment Cash 14% 5% 14%<br />
Credit 86% 95% 86%<br />
Other 0% 0% 0%<br />
Total 100% 100% 100%<br />
Credit CARDER 1% 1% 1%<br />
GV-USPP 93% 95% 93%<br />
Other formal lender 3% 2% 3%<br />
<strong>In</strong>formal lender 3% 1% 3%<br />
Total 100% 100% 100%<br />
Source: IFPRI-LARES Small Farmer Survey.<br />
Table 4.1.63-Characteristics of fertilizer purchases by expenditure category<br />
Expenditure category (quintile)<br />
Poorest 2 3 4 Richest Total<br />
Distance (km) 5.6 4.5 5.2 7.6 9.3 6.5<br />
Supplier Farmer 3% 3% 2% 4% 1% 3%<br />
Trader 2% 3% 5% 2% 4% 3%<br />
CARDER 6% 5% 3% 2% 16% 6%<br />
GV/SONAPRA 90% 90% 90% 92% 79% 88%<br />
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%<br />
Payment Cash 10% 8% 9% 12% 23% 14%<br />
Credit 90% 91% 91% 88% 77% 86%<br />
Other 0% 1% 0% . . 0%<br />
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%<br />
Credit CARDER 0% 3% 1%<br />
GV-USPP 90% 93% 97% 99% 86% 93%<br />
Other formal lender 6% 1% 1% 10% 3%<br />
<strong>In</strong>formal lender 3% 2% 3% 1% 5% 3%<br />
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%<br />
Source: IFPRI-LARES Small Farmer Survey.<br />
152
Change language