23.01.2014 Views

Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>In</strong>put quality<br />

GV representatives were also asked about the quality of inputs. Very few GVs complained<br />

about the quality of herbicide (4 percent) and cotton seed (6 percent). Complaints about quality<br />

were somewhat more common in the case of fertilizer (15 percent), particularly in Atacora and Zou.<br />

The most common complaints about quality concerned pesticides. Over half the GVs in the sample<br />

reported that the pesticides were of poor quality, with the percentage being highest in Atacora (71<br />

percent) and Borgou (67percent) (see Table 4.3.39).<br />

The problem with the pesticides was that they were ineffective (86 percent of those complaining),<br />

while fertilizer problems were attributed to both ineffectiveness (48 percent) and counterfeit<br />

products (38percent). <strong>In</strong> the vast majority of cases where the quality was low, the GV members<br />

had no choice but to accept the inputs.<br />

<strong>Farmers</strong> declining to take delivery on orders<br />

A third input problem discussed is whether GV members took delivery on the inputs they<br />

ordered through the GV. This appears to be a small but not negligible problem. The number of<br />

GVs reporting this problem ranged from 4 to 9 percent, depending on the input. The number of<br />

members refusing to buy all they had ordered is less than 5 percent overall, but among GVs<br />

reporting the problem 29 percent of the members are implicated. <strong>In</strong> other words, most GVs (83<br />

percent) had no problem in this regard, but those that did often had more than the quarter of the<br />

members defaulting on orders (see Table 4.3.40 and 4.3.41).<br />

When asked about the reasons for this behavior, GV representatives attributed it to members<br />

ordering more than they needed. Few blamed it on weather being more adverse than expected. <strong>In</strong><br />

the case of herbicides, pesticides, and cotton seed, the GVs generally stored the surplus for<br />

distribution the following year. <strong>In</strong> the case of fertilizer, which is more bulky, more effort was made<br />

to sell it elsewhere or return it to the supplier.<br />

Credit repayment<br />

A fourth problem concerns the repayment of input credits to the GV. Normally, the cost of<br />

inputs in deducted from the cotton payments at harvest time. About one half of the GV say that<br />

some members defaulted on their input credit, but these defaulters represent just 5 percent of all GV<br />

128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!