Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...
Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ... Impact Of Agricultural Market Reforms On Smallholder Farmers In ...
villageois, (GV)) was needed as these groups handle 90 percent of input distribution in Benin and all of the cotton marketing. Accordingly, an additional survey of 189 GVs was designed and launched there during the period June to December 1999. Data collection in all surveys were implemented by the collaborating institutions, LARES in Benin and APRU in Malawi. In Malawi, the interviews were conducted by a team of eight enumerators, under the supervision of Mr. Richard Kachule of APRU. In Benin, the survey team was comprised of 10 enumerators supervised by Dr. Bio Goura Soulé. Data entry was also conducted in both countries by some of the senior enumerators who had participated in the surveys. Data cleaning was done jointly between IFPRI and all its collaborators. More details about the survey methodologies, sampling, questionnaire design, and data collection are presented in the appropriate chapters of this report. Following survey data collection and cleaning, analysis of survey data was conducted at IFPRI. Descriptive statistics from each of the surveys were generated and tabulated. This report’s findings are based on the interpretation of these descriptive statistics. Regression analysis was also used to understand the factors that influence four key variables in the smallholder farm sector. First, a Heckman two-stage regression analysis was used to identify the factors that affect the decision to use fertilizer and the amount of fertilizer used. Second, regression analysis was conducted to examine the determinants of marketed surplus, defined as the percentage of the value of crop production that is marketed. Third, regression analysis was used to examine the factors associated with poverty. And finally, an ordered probit regression analysis was used to determine the characteristics of households that consider themselves better or worse off compared to several years ago (1992 in Benin and 1995 in Malawi). 1.3 Organization of the report The report consists of two volumes. Volume 1, the present volume, presents the results of the surveys of farmers, farmer organizations, and villages. Volume 2 focuses on the results of the trader and market surveys. Volume 1 is organized in six chapters. After this introductory chapter, Chapter 2 provides background on the Republic of Benin, focusing on the evolution of policy affecting agriculture, the performance of the sector in the reform period (since 1990), and a review of previous research on the agricultural economy of Benin. Chapter 3 describes the backgrounds and evolution of policy in 3
Malawi, focusing on the reforms that have been implemented since the mid-1980s. Chapter 4 describes the results of the three Benin surveys: the farmer survey, the community survey, and the survey of groupements villageois. Chapter 5 presents the results of the surveys of farmers and communities in Malawi. Chapter 6 summarizes the results from both countries, draws some conclusions about the impact of the reforms on small farmers, and derives a number of policy implications for Benin and Malawi. 4
- Page 1 and 2: IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL MARKET REFOR
- Page 4 and 5: TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 - INTRO
- Page 6 and 7: 5.1.10 Expenditure patterns .......
- Page 8 and 9: CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION 1.1 Backgr
- Page 12 and 13: CHAPTER 2: POLICY BACKGROUND FOR BE
- Page 14 and 15: 2.3 Evolution of Economic Policy 2.
- Page 16 and 17: Under pressure from the World Bank
- Page 18 and 19: anking system has been restored to
- Page 20 and 21: Fertilizer can be imported outside
- Page 22 and 23: particularly urban wage-earners. On
- Page 24 and 25: Soulé (1996) describes the evoluti
- Page 26 and 27: led to a more sustainable agricultu
- Page 28: Table 2.4 - Gross farm revenue from
- Page 31 and 32: Malawi’s economy is heavily depen
- Page 33 and 34: the reduction of its operations in
- Page 35 and 36: crops is also difficult because tob
- Page 37 and 38: Table 3.1 CROP 1982/83 1983/84 1984
- Page 40 and 41: CHAPTER 4: RESULTS OF THE BÉNIN SM
- Page 42 and 43: where W v is the weight for a house
- Page 44 and 45: heads. This suggests that some of t
- Page 46 and 47: And school attendance is much highe
- Page 48 and 49: Crop production is the main activit
- Page 50 and 51: (33 percent). Livestock income is m
- Page 52 and 53: Somewhat surprisingly, the relation
- Page 54 and 55: It is no more common among richer h
- Page 56 and 57: production, and women actually spen
- Page 58 and 59: Seed use by crop Although only 18 p
villageois, (GV)) was needed as these groups handle 90 percent of input distribution in Benin and<br />
all of the cotton marketing. Accordingly, an additional survey of 189 GVs was designed and<br />
launched there during the period June to December 1999.<br />
Data collection in all surveys were implemented by the collaborating institutions, LARES in Benin<br />
and APRU in Malawi. <strong>In</strong> Malawi, the interviews were conducted by a team of eight enumerators,<br />
under the supervision of Mr. Richard Kachule of APRU. <strong>In</strong> Benin, the survey team was comprised<br />
of 10 enumerators supervised by Dr. Bio Goura Soulé. Data entry was also conducted in both<br />
countries by some of the senior enumerators who had participated in the surveys. Data cleaning<br />
was done jointly between IFPRI and all its collaborators. More details about the survey<br />
methodologies, sampling, questionnaire design, and data collection are presented in the appropriate<br />
chapters of this report.<br />
Following survey data collection and cleaning, analysis of survey data was conducted at IFPRI.<br />
Descriptive statistics from each of the surveys were generated and tabulated. This report’s findings<br />
are based on the interpretation of these descriptive statistics. Regression analysis was also used to<br />
understand the factors that influence four key variables in the smallholder farm sector. First, a<br />
Heckman two-stage regression analysis was used to identify the factors that affect the decision to<br />
use fertilizer and the amount of fertilizer used. Second, regression analysis was conducted to<br />
examine the determinants of marketed surplus, defined as the percentage of the value of crop<br />
production that is marketed. Third, regression analysis was used to examine the factors associated<br />
with poverty. And finally, an ordered probit regression analysis was used to determine the<br />
characteristics of households that consider themselves better or worse off compared to several years<br />
ago (1992 in Benin and 1995 in Malawi).<br />
1.3 Organization of the report<br />
The report consists of two volumes. Volume 1, the present volume, presents the results of the<br />
surveys of farmers, farmer organizations, and villages. Volume 2 focuses on the results of the<br />
trader and market surveys.<br />
Volume 1 is organized in six chapters. After this introductory chapter, Chapter 2 provides<br />
background on the Republic of Benin, focusing on the evolution of policy affecting agriculture, the<br />
performance of the sector in the reform period (since 1990), and a review of previous research on<br />
the agricultural economy of Benin. Chapter 3 describes the backgrounds and evolution of policy in<br />
3