23.01.2014 Views

An Economic Assessment of Banana Genetic Improvement and ...

An Economic Assessment of Banana Genetic Improvement and ...

An Economic Assessment of Banana Genetic Improvement and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

80 CHAPTER 6<br />

Table 6.2 Summary statistics for variables defined at the cultivar level<br />

Mean (st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation)<br />

Variable Definition Nakitembe Mbwazirume Kibuzi Nakinyika Enjagata Kisansa Mpologoma<br />

Dependent variable<br />

Count<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> plants for<br />

i = 1, . . . ,7 banana<br />

cultivars<br />

11.60<br />

(6.95)<br />

3.74<br />

(2.29)<br />

3.92<br />

(1.74)<br />

3.16<br />

(1.77)<br />

0.97<br />

(0.68)<br />

2.24<br />

(4.60)<br />

1.70<br />

(4.56)<br />

Explanatory variables<br />

Farm-gate<br />

price<br />

Expected price received<br />

at farm gate (thous<strong>and</strong><br />

Ush), by cultivar<br />

2.05<br />

(0.13)<br />

2.10<br />

(0.15)<br />

1.88<br />

(0.15)<br />

1.69<br />

(0.12)<br />

1.81<br />

(0.12)<br />

2.15<br />

(0.14)<br />

3.03<br />

(0.31)<br />

Cooking<br />

quality<br />

Cooking quality (1 = bad;<br />

2 = neither good nor<br />

bad; 3 = very good)<br />

2.92<br />

(0.07)<br />

2.91<br />

(0.06)<br />

2.89<br />

(0.07)<br />

2.97<br />

(0.03)<br />

2.93<br />

(0.05)<br />

2.88<br />

(0.06)<br />

2.82<br />

(0.08)<br />

Loss due<br />

to black<br />

Sigatoka<br />

Expected bunch size loss<br />

(percent) (in the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> black Sigatoka)<br />

6.05<br />

(2.01)<br />

4.14<br />

(1.46)<br />

7.90<br />

(2.39)<br />

6.68<br />

(2.49)<br />

1.63<br />

(0.64)<br />

3.53<br />

(1.13)<br />

3.56<br />

(1.61)<br />

Loss due to<br />

weevils<br />

Expected bunch size<br />

loss (percent) (in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> weevils)<br />

13.17<br />

(2.87)<br />

13.73<br />

(2.76)<br />

13.90<br />

(2.68)<br />

11.31<br />

(2.56)<br />

8.91<br />

(1.55)<br />

16.17<br />

(3.31)<br />

9.66<br />

(2.27)<br />

Notes: The mean is calculated as a weighted average for each variable. See footnote 9, Chapter 5, for explanation <strong>of</strong> measurement <strong>of</strong> yield<br />

losses.<br />

rience <strong>and</strong> education <strong>of</strong> the banana production<br />

decisionmaker, 6 household size, the<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> dependents in each household,<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> visits by extension<br />

agents, livestock assets, <strong>and</strong> exogenous income<br />

(defined as household receipts <strong>of</strong> remittances<br />

<strong>and</strong> other nonfarm income in the<br />

previous year). Larger households <strong>and</strong> those<br />

with more dependents are expected to have<br />

greater cultivar dem<strong>and</strong> for meeting immediate<br />

consumption needs. No sign is hypothesized<br />

a priori for other household<br />

characteristics. <br />

Farm characteristics are banana production<br />

area, household location (by elevation),<br />

<strong>and</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> distinct cultivars available<br />

in the village. Given the taxonomy used<br />

to classify cultivars in the survey, the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> distinct cultivars represents the local<br />

stock <strong>of</strong> cultivar attributes. A positive relationship<br />

between banana area <strong>and</strong> cultivar<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> is expected. No direction <strong>of</strong> effect<br />

is hypothesized for the relationship between<br />

a greater availability <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong><br />

banana planting material in a village <strong>and</strong><br />

the dem<strong>and</strong> for any single cultivar. A greater<br />

range <strong>of</strong> choice may lead to more or fewer<br />

types grown per plantation.<br />

Household transaction costs are represented<br />

by a measure <strong>of</strong> the time needed to<br />

get to the nearest banana market (Table 6.1)<br />

<strong>and</strong> the supply (or farm-gate) price (Table<br />

6.2). The farm-gate price is calculated using<br />

a triangular distribution for bunch prices<br />

6<br />

Experience is corrected by age to reflect population dynamics in Ug<strong>and</strong>a, where high mortality rates among<br />

the active adult population cause young people to be relatively more experienced for a given task than would<br />

otherwise be the case. The banana production decisionmaker is not necessarily the household head, but the<br />

person in charge <strong>of</strong> banana production <strong>and</strong> management decisions in the household. In Ug<strong>and</strong>a, this person is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten a woman.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!