20 CHAPTER 2 Figure 2.4 Time pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> research costs <strong>and</strong> benefits Gross annual benefits (US$ per year) Technology-induced benefits 0 R&D, regulatory, <strong>and</strong> 15 20 25 30 dissemination costs Years R&D <strong>and</strong> regulatory time lags <strong>An</strong>nual cost Source: Alston, Norton, <strong>and</strong> Pardey (1995). Adoption pr<strong>of</strong>ile year <strong>and</strong> the horizontal axis represents years after the commencement <strong>of</strong> the R&D investment. here> 2.4hear
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND SAMPLE SURVEY DESIGN 21 these analyses is the theoretical model <strong>of</strong> the household farm, which is particularly suitable for investigating farmer decisionmaking in situations where the costs <strong>of</strong> transacting in markets can be high. The economic surplus approach is applied at the industry level, <strong>and</strong> is aimed at providing key information to support policy decisions concerning investment priorities. The corresponding analyses <strong>and</strong> more details regarding each model are presented in separate chapters <strong>of</strong> Part III. The sample design represents an effort to address the challenge <strong>of</strong> defining the “counterfactual.” The research team developed a sampling frame that controls for previous exposure to new banana cultivars <strong>and</strong> practices. The sample <strong>of</strong> villages <strong>and</strong> households is also stratified by elevation, a parameter that is highly correlated with pests <strong>and</strong> disease pressures, as well as soil fertility, which are major constraints to banana productivity <strong>and</strong> the focus <strong>of</strong> banana improvement efforts. References Alston, J. M., G. W. Norton, <strong>and</strong> P. G. Pardey. 1995. Science under scarcity: Principles <strong>and</strong> practices for agricultural research evaluation <strong>and</strong> priority setting. Wallingford, U.K.: CAB International. de Janvry, A., M. Fafchamps, <strong>and</strong> E. Sadoulet. 1991. Peasant household behaviour with missing markets: Some paradoxes explained. <strong>Economic</strong> Journal 101 (November): 1400–1417. Duflo, E., <strong>and</strong> M. Kremer. 2003. Use <strong>of</strong> r<strong>and</strong>omization in the evaluation <strong>of</strong> development effectiveness. Paper prepared for the World Bank Operations Evaluation Department, Conference on Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Development Effectiveness, 15–16 July, Washington, D.C. Feder, G., <strong>and</strong> D. Umali. 1993. The adoption <strong>of</strong> agricultural innovations: A review. Technological Forecasting <strong>and</strong> Social Change 43: 215–239. Feder, G., R. Just, <strong>and</strong> D. Zilberman. 1985. Adoption <strong>of</strong> agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. <strong>Economic</strong> Development <strong>and</strong> Cultural Change 33 (2): 255–298. Heckman, J. J. 1976. The common structure <strong>of</strong> statistical models <strong>of</strong> truncation, sample selection, <strong>and</strong> limited dependent variables <strong>and</strong> a simple estimator for such models. <strong>An</strong>nals <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>and</strong> Social Measurement 5 (4): 475–492. ———. 1990. Varieties <strong>of</strong> selection bias. American <strong>Economic</strong> Review 80 (2): 313–318. Johnston, J., <strong>and</strong> J. di Nardo. 1997. Econometric methods. Fourth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Kerr, J., <strong>and</strong> S. Kolavalli. 1999. Impact <strong>of</strong> agricultural research on poverty alleviation: Conceptual framework with illustrations from the literature. Environment <strong>and</strong> Production Technology Division Discussion Paper 56. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. Meinzen-Dick, R., M. Adato, P. Hazell, <strong>and</strong> L. Haddad. 2007. Findings <strong>of</strong> an integrated economic <strong>and</strong> social analysis. In Agricultural research, livelihoods, <strong>and</strong> poverty: Studies <strong>of</strong> economic <strong>and</strong> social impacts in six countries, ed. M. Adato <strong>and</strong> R. Meinzen-Dick. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Speijer, P. R., C. S. Gold, E. B. Karamura, <strong>and</strong> J. N. Kashaija. 1994. <strong>Banana</strong> weevil <strong>and</strong> nematode distribution patterns in highl<strong>and</strong> banana systems in Ug<strong>and</strong>a: Preliminary results from a diagnostic survey. In African Crop Science Conference proceedings, ed. E. Adipala, M. A. Bekunda, J. S. Tenywa, M. W. Ogenga-Latigo, <strong>and</strong> J. O. Mugah. Kampala: African Crop Science Society. Tushemereirwe, W., D. A. Karamura, H. Sali, D. Bwamiki, I. Kashaija, C. Nankinga, F. Bagamba, A. Kangire, <strong>and</strong> R. Sebuliba. 2001. <strong>Banana</strong>s (Musa spp.). In Agriculture in Ug<strong>and</strong>a, Vol. 11, Crops, ed. J. Mukiibi. Kampala: Fountain Publishers/Technical Centre for Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Rural Cooperation/National Agricultural Research Organization.
- Page 1 and 2: An Economic Assessment of Banana Ge
- Page 3 and 4: Contents List of Tables List of Fig
- Page 5 and 6: Tables 3.1 Net marketing margins pe
- Page 7 and 8: TABLES vii 6.5 Characteristics of h
- Page 9 and 10: Figures 2.1 Sample domain: Elevatio
- Page 11 and 12: Acknowledgments The International F
- Page 13 and 14: SUMMARY xiii en’s education--and
- Page 15 and 16: Acronyms and Abbreviations AGT ARDI
- Page 17: Part I. Research Methods
- Page 20 and 21: 4 CHAPTER 1 practices in Africa are
- Page 22 and 23: 6 CHAPTER 1 periment station. Not a
- Page 24 and 25: 8 CHAPTER 1 niques (based on seed p
- Page 26 and 27: 10 CHAPTER 1 Cohen, J. I., and R. P
- Page 28 and 29: CHAPTER 2 Elements of the Conceptua
- Page 30 and 31: 14 CHAPTER 2 ples of adoption disco
- Page 32 and 33: 16 CHAPTER 2 transgenic bananas cur
- Page 34 and 35: 18 CHAPTER 2 Figure 2.2 Sites sampl
- Page 39: Part II. Research Context
- Page 42 and 43: here> 1near 3. 26 CHAPTER 3 major f
- Page 44 and 45: 28 CHAPTER 3 disease, which affects
- Page 46 and 47: here> 1near 3. 30 CHAPTER 3 Table 3
- Page 48 and 49: 32 CHAPTER 3 Table 3.2 Banana produ
- Page 50 and 51: 34 CHAPTER 3 would only be able to
- Page 52 and 53: 36 CHAPTER 3 Nkonya, E., J. Pender,
- Page 54 and 55: here> 1near 4. 38 CHAPTER 4 cash ne
- Page 56 and 57: 40 CHAPTER 4 Figure 4.1 Introductio
- Page 58 and 59: 42 CHAPTER 4 Research Introductions
- Page 60 and 61: 44 CHAPTER 4 Table 4.2 Names of the
- Page 62 and 63: 46 CHAPTER 4 The most widely used m
- Page 64 and 65: 48 CHAPTER 4 Ortíz, R., and D. Vuy
- Page 66 and 67: here> 5.3near here>
- Page 68 and 69: 52 CHAPTER 5 Table 5.4 Percentage o
- Page 70 and 71: 54 CHAPTER 5 Table 5.7 Percentage o
- Page 72 and 73: here> 9near 5. here> 10near 5. 56 C
- Page 74 and 75: here> 12near 5. 58 CHAPTER 5 Table
- Page 76 and 77: 60 CHAPTER 5 Table 5.14 Number and
- Page 78 and 79: here> 18near 5. 62 CHAPTER 5 Table
- Page 80 and 81: 64 CHAPTER 5 Table 5.20 Average num
- Page 82 and 83: 66 CHAPTER 5 Table 5.23 Percentage
- Page 84 and 85: 68 CHAPTER 5 Table 5.26 Average dis
- Page 86 and 87:
70 CHAPTER 5 considerably higher in
- Page 89:
Part III. Economic Assessment of Te
- Page 92 and 93:
76 CHAPTER 6 The agricultural house
- Page 94 and 95:
78 CHAPTER 6 grow, but have grown i
- Page 96 and 97:
80 CHAPTER 6 Table 6.2 Summary stat
- Page 98 and 99:
82 CHAPTER 6 tion. More frequent vi
- Page 100 and 101:
84 CHAPTER 6 Table 6.4 Prototype ho
- Page 102 and 103:
86 CHAPTER 6 Table 6.5 Characterist
- Page 104 and 105:
88 CHAPTER 6 References Cameron, A.
- Page 106 and 107:
90 CHAPTER 7 by-products of other f
- Page 108 and 109:
here> 1near 7. 92 CHAPTER 7 Table 7
- Page 110 and 111:
94 CHAPTER 7 ity in the two technol
- Page 112 and 113:
96 CHAPTER 7 Table 7.2 Definition o
- Page 114 and 115:
98 CHAPTER 7 The direct link betwee
- Page 116 and 117:
100 CHAPTER 7 Table 7.3 Factors inf
- Page 118 and 119:
102 CHAPTER 7 tive sign but are onl
- Page 120 and 121:
104 CHAPTER 7 fertility management
- Page 122 and 123:
106 CHAPTER 7 participatory decisio
- Page 124 and 125:
108 CHAPTER 7 Stevens, J. P. 2002.
- Page 126 and 127:
110 CHAPTER 8 defined as a function
- Page 128 and 129:
112 CHAPTER 8 inputs or implement c
- Page 130 and 131:
114 CHAPTER 8 Crop output is determ
- Page 132 and 133:
116 CHAPTER 8 Table 8.1 Variable de
- Page 134 and 135:
here> 8.6near here> 8.2near 8.3nea
- Page 136 and 137:
120 CHAPTER 8 Table 8.4 Production
- Page 138 and 139:
122 CHAPTER 8 during the SOM decomp
- Page 140 and 141:
124 CHAPTER 8 Supplementary Tables
- Page 142 and 143:
126 CHAPTER 8 Table 8A.3 Production
- Page 144 and 145:
128 CHAPTER 8 Thomas, G. W. 1982. E
- Page 146 and 147:
130 CHAPTER 9 (Nkuba et al. 1999).
- Page 148 and 149:
132 CHAPTER 9 be reduced through la
- Page 150 and 151:
134 CHAPTER 9 Table 9.2 Summary sta
- Page 152 and 153:
136 CHAPTER 9 Table 9.3 Coefficient
- Page 154 and 155:
138 CHAPTER 9 Table 9.4 Mean compar
- Page 156 and 157:
140 CHAPTER 9 References Anandajaya
- Page 158 and 159:
142 CHAPTER 10 Table 10.1 Ugandan c
- Page 160 and 161:
144 CHAPTER 10 (Kangire and Rutherf
- Page 162 and 163:
146 CHAPTER 10 Table 10.4 Predomina
- Page 164 and 165:
here> 7near 10. 148 CHAPTER 10 Tabl
- Page 166 and 167:
150 CHAPTER 10 Table 10.8 Present v
- Page 168 and 169:
152 CHAPTER 10 In terms of specific
- Page 171:
Part IV. Conclusions
- Page 174 and 175:
158 CHAPTER 11 in cooking, brewing
- Page 176 and 177:
160 CHAPTER 11 sumption and income
- Page 178 and 179:
162 CHAPTER 11 4. 5. for which the
- Page 181 and 182:
APPENDIX A Banana Taxonomy for Ugan
- Page 183 and 184:
BANANA TAXONOMY FOR UGANDA 167 Tabl
- Page 185 and 186:
BANANA TAXONOMY FOR UGANDA 169 Tabl
- Page 187 and 188:
BANANA TAXONOMY FOR TANZANIA 171 Ta
- Page 189 and 190:
BANANA TAXONOMY FOR TANZANIA 173 Ta
- Page 191 and 192:
APPENDIX C Use of Improved Banana V
- Page 193 and 194:
DETAILS OF SAMPLE SURVEY DESIGN 177
- Page 195 and 196:
DETAILS OF SAMPLE SURVEY DESIGN 179
- Page 197 and 198:
DETAILS OF SAMPLE SURVEY DESIGN 181
- Page 199 and 200:
VILLAGE SOCIAL STRUCTURE IN UGANDA
- Page 201 and 202:
List of Principal Authors and Contr
- Page 203 and 204:
ABOUT THE AUTHORS 187 rigation, and