23.01.2014 Views

An Economic Assessment of Banana Genetic Improvement and ...

An Economic Assessment of Banana Genetic Improvement and ...

An Economic Assessment of Banana Genetic Improvement and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 10<br />

Assessing the Potential Impact <strong>of</strong> Selected<br />

Technologies on the <strong>Banana</strong> Industry in<br />

Ug<strong>and</strong>a<br />

Robert Kalyebara, Stanley Wood, <strong>and</strong> Pamela Nahamya Abodi<br />

In this chapter, an economic surplus approach is applied to assess the potential impact <strong>of</strong> a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> current <strong>and</strong> emerging technologies. Specialists <strong>and</strong> experts guided the definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> 6 banana production systems, determined according to productivity potential <strong>and</strong> the<br />

commercial orientation <strong>of</strong> growers, <strong>and</strong> 14 technology scenarios that span current best practices<br />

for managing bananas, genetic transformation, <strong>and</strong> conventional breeding. Simulations<br />

indicate that current recommended scenarios could generate the highest levels <strong>of</strong> gross benefits,<br />

assuming relatively high rates <strong>of</strong> adoption. Transgenic varieties resistant to major pests<br />

<strong>and</strong> diseases currently affecting banana production in Ug<strong>and</strong>a appear to generate greater potential<br />

benefits than do conventional technologies. In part, this finding reflects expectations<br />

that gene insertion is more effective at combating specific pests <strong>and</strong> diseases. Time lags associated<br />

with R&D are also expected to be even longer for conventional banana improvement<br />

than for genetic transformation, given the plant’s sterility.<br />

Characterizing <strong>Banana</strong> Production Systems<br />

Six banana production systems were defined for the purpose <strong>of</strong> this analysis, using the approach<br />

taken by specialists in Ug<strong>and</strong>a (Tushemereirwe et al. 2001). This categorization involved<br />

the recognition <strong>of</strong> three classes <strong>of</strong> geographical area according to their intrinsic<br />

biophysical suitability to support banana production (high-, medium-, <strong>and</strong> low-potential productivity<br />

zones), in each <strong>of</strong> which production is subdivided into two categories according to<br />

the production orientation <strong>of</strong> growers (semicommercial <strong>and</strong> subsistence). Most producers<br />

maintain banana plantations primarily to meet food security <strong>and</strong> cultural needs, only intermittently<br />

entering the market as opportunities <strong>and</strong> needs arise. There is a much smaller but growing<br />

share <strong>of</strong> farmers whose main focus is to produce for the banana market. Clearly, production<br />

<strong>and</strong> technology use decisions, <strong>and</strong> response to market opportunities <strong>and</strong> signals, are<br />

distinct for these two groups.<br />

Table 10.1 summarizes the main characteristics <strong>of</strong> the six systems with respect to the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> cooking bananas (the endemic AAA-EA cultivar group matooke, as well as<br />

some exotic FHIA hybrids). Across all areas in Ug<strong>and</strong>a, a total <strong>of</strong> some 5.5 million tons <strong>of</strong><br />

cooking bananas are produced from about 450,000 ha <strong>of</strong> cropl<strong>and</strong>, at a rough national average<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> around 12 tons per ha (UBOS 2002). Beer <strong>and</strong> sweet cultivars account for an<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!