An Economic Assessment of Banana Genetic Improvement and ...

An Economic Assessment of Banana Genetic Improvement and ... An Economic Assessment of Banana Genetic Improvement and ...

ifpri.cgiar.org
from ifpri.cgiar.org More from this publisher
23.01.2014 Views

134 CHAPTER 9 Table 9.2 Summary statistics and hypothesized effects of variables used in the analysis Variable Description Mean Standard deviation Dependent variables Hybrid use Household grows a hybrid cultivar (yes = 1; no = 0) 0.19 0.39 Yield loss Average expected yield loss to joint biotic pressures (percent) 4.23 7.31 Explanatory variables Gender Gender of primary production decisionmaker (1 = male) 0.70 0.46 Education Average aggregate household education level (years of 6.30 1.98 schooling) Experience Years of experience tending for the banana grove 20.57 13.87 Dependency ratio Ratio of children and elderly to active adult household 0.48 0.22 members Extension Number of contacts with extension agents 1.63 4.01 Exogenous income Income received in previous period (ten thousand Tsh) 20.34 62.69 Livestock assets Value of total livestock assets (ten thousand Tsh) 20.28 43.92 Farm size Size of landholding (acres) 1.72 1.43 Elevation Elevation (stratification variable; 1 = low) 0.85 0.36 Probability BS Perceived frequency of occurrence of black Sigatoka disease 0.09 0.18 Probability FW Perceived frequency of occurrence of Fusarium wilt disease 0.23 0.23 Probability WE Perceived frequency of occurrence of weevils 0.34 0.28 of the landholding, another indicator of wealth and the scale of production. Exposure to banana hybrids and elevation are two stratification variables. Only elevation is included as an instrument in the use equation, allowing for the identification of the treatment effect in the impact equation. The strength of the exposure variable in capturing the effect of use of formally distributed hybrids was compromised by the markedly informal means of transfer of planting material from one farmer to another (this interpretation is supported by descriptive information summarized in Chapter 5). With as many as 20 percent of farmers in nonexposed areas reported to grow banana hybrids, the treatment effect of exposure was dissipated. Geographical location is believed to better explain use behavior, with 96 percent of households growing banana hybrids (that is, 48 of the 50 households using hybrids) residing in low-elevation areas. Determinants of Production Vulnerability Among the variables hypothesized to have an effect on production vulnerability are the acquired human capital variables and scale of production (farm size). These characteristics are intended to capture preferences for management of the banana grove and scale of production, which have implications for yield loss, whereas the frequencies of occurrence of the three biotic pressures reflect the direct effects of disease and pest constraints on production vulnerability. Production vulnerability is also hypothesized to depend on the use of banana hybrids. As hybrids are bred for resistance to biotic pressures (in

USE OF HYBRID CULTIVARS IN KAGERA REGION, TANZANIA 135 particular to black Sigatoka and weevils), they are expected to reduce the average production vulnerability for households that grow them. Results Before the treatment effect model was estimated, the exogeneity of the dichotomous variable for use of banana hybrids was tested in the impact equation. The test was achieved through several steps. First, the use equation was estimated using logit, and the residuals were saved. Then the impact equation was estimated using the actual observations for use of banana hybrids, as well as the saved residuals. No statistical indication of correlation between the errors of the impact and use equations was found (p-value = 0.194 for residuals), supporting the inclusion of use of banana hybrids as an explanatory variable in the impact equation (Woodridge 2001). The treatment effect model is estimated using maximum likelihood methods. The statistical validity of a simultaneous estimation of both equations is evidenced by the significance of the hazard function (p-value = 0.045 for lambda). The information from one behavioral process (that is, treatment regression) influences the outcomes of another process (that is, the impact equation), similarly to the Mills ratio in a Heckman estimation approach. Estimated coefficients are presented in Table 9.3 separately for the use and impact equations. here> 9.3near

USE OF HYBRID CULTIVARS IN KAGERA REGION, TANZANIA 135<br />

particular to black Sigatoka <strong>and</strong> weevils),<br />

they are expected to reduce the average production<br />

vulnerability for households that<br />

grow them.<br />

Results<br />

Before the treatment effect model was estimated,<br />

the exogeneity <strong>of</strong> the dichotomous<br />

variable for use <strong>of</strong> banana hybrids was<br />

tested in the impact equation. The test was<br />

achieved through several steps. First, the<br />

use equation was estimated using logit, <strong>and</strong><br />

the residuals were saved. Then the impact<br />

equation was estimated using the actual<br />

observations for use <strong>of</strong> banana hybrids, as<br />

well as the saved residuals. No statistical<br />

indication <strong>of</strong> correlation between the errors<br />

<strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>and</strong> use equations was found<br />

(p-value = 0.194 for residuals), supporting<br />

the inclusion <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> banana hybrids as an<br />

explanatory variable in the impact equation<br />

(Woodridge 2001).<br />

The treatment effect model is estimated<br />

using maximum likelihood methods. The<br />

statistical validity <strong>of</strong> a simultaneous estimation<br />

<strong>of</strong> both equations is evidenced by the<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> the hazard function (p-value<br />

= 0.045 for lambda). The information from<br />

one behavioral process (that is, treatment<br />

regression) influences the outcomes <strong>of</strong> another<br />

process (that is, the impact equation),<br />

similarly to the Mills ratio in a Heckman<br />

estimation approach. Estimated coefficients<br />

are presented in Table 9.3 separately for the<br />

use <strong>and</strong> impact equations. here> 9.3near

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!