Mineral resources: Introduction to ore formation in a global context ...
Mineral resources: Introduction to ore formation in a global context ... Mineral resources: Introduction to ore formation in a global context ...
Mineral resources: Introduction to ore formation in a global context Bernd Lehmann Techn U Clausthal
- Page 2 and 3: Solar nebula condensation
- Page 4 and 5: Fluid inclusions in halite of Monah
- Page 6: Condensation of the elements from a
- Page 9 and 10: Allègre et al, GCA 59:1445-1456 (1
- Page 11 and 12: Galileo image 29 Oct 1991 Ida (58 x
- Page 13 and 14: EARTH
- Page 15 and 16: Taylor and McLennan (1985: 266)
- Page 17 and 18: Sulfur solubility in mid-ocean ridg
- Page 19 and 20: S-Fe-Cu system First crystallizatio
- Page 21: Metal content in sulfide melt vs ra
- Page 25 and 26: Norilsk, Russia ~250 Ma 1.3 Gt @ 1.
- Page 27 and 28: 2780 m Upper Zone (2130 m) with tit
- Page 29 and 30: Bushveld Complex: View from the sur
- Page 31 and 32: UG-2, Karee Mine Merensky Reef, Ato
- Page 33 and 34: UG-2, Maandagshoek
- Page 35 and 36: Scoates and Friedman (2006) EG 103:
- Page 37 and 38: Hartley Mine, Great Dyke GD-11-D (T
- Page 39 and 40: Sudbury district: Shatter cones in
- Page 41 and 42: O’Donnell Roast Beds
- Page 43: Decompression melting of the mantle
- Page 48 and 49: Seismic cross section at 21°S (Anc
- Page 51 and 52: Hildreth (1981) Gradients in silici
<strong>M<strong>in</strong>eral</strong> <strong>resources</strong>:<br />
<strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
<strong>ore</strong> <strong>formation</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong> a <strong>global</strong><br />
<strong>context</strong><br />
Bernd Lehmann<br />
Techn U Clausthal
Solar nebula condensation
Marlow, L5 chondrite, Oklahoma, USA: Oliv<strong>in</strong>e
Fluid <strong>in</strong>clusions <strong>in</strong> halite of Monahans H5 chondrite<br />
(Fall of 22 Mar 1998, Monahans, Texas, USA)<br />
5 µm 5 µm<br />
Zolensky et al., Science 285, 1377 -1379 (1999)
10 6<br />
10 5<br />
Accretion + c<strong>ore</strong>-mantle fractionation<br />
S<br />
C<br />
Fe<br />
Mg<br />
O<br />
Si<br />
C1 chondrites (ppm)<br />
10 4<br />
10 3<br />
10 2<br />
10 1<br />
10 0<br />
10 -1<br />
10 -2<br />
10 -3<br />
Cl<br />
Cu<br />
F<br />
Ge<br />
Se<br />
Ga<br />
ScSr<br />
Br<br />
Zr<br />
Te Pb<br />
Rb Ba<br />
Pt As<br />
Li Y<br />
Sn<br />
Ru<br />
B<br />
Os I Cd<br />
Mo<br />
Pd Ir<br />
Ce<br />
Cs Nb La<br />
Au<br />
Sm<br />
Gd Dy<br />
Sb Ag Yb Er<br />
Bi<br />
Nd<br />
Rh In W Pr Hf<br />
Tl<br />
Ho Eu<br />
Tb<br />
Re Tm Be Lu Th<br />
U<br />
Ta<br />
P<br />
Co<br />
Zn<br />
V<br />
K<br />
Ni<br />
Na<br />
Mn<br />
Ti<br />
1 : 2.3<br />
Cr<br />
Ca<br />
Al<br />
Siderophile +<br />
refrac<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
Lithophile +<br />
refrac<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
Moderately<br />
volatile<br />
Volatile<br />
( < 600 K)<br />
10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6<br />
Primitive mantle (ppm)
Condensation of the elements from a gas phase of solar composition at 10 -4 atm<br />
Grossman and Larimer (1974)
Halliday and Wood (2009) Science 325: 44
Allègre et al, GCA 59:1445-1456 (1995)
Chicxulub crater, 65.3 Ma<br />
160 km
Galileo image 29 Oct 1991<br />
Ida (58 x 23 km)<br />
Dactyl (1.6 x 1.2 km)<br />
~200 Ma old orbits Ida at 90 km<br />
distance
Allègre (1985) De la pierre à l‘é<strong>to</strong>ile, p. 238
EARTH
Mantle-crust fractionation
Taylor and McLennan (1985: 266)
Ni (ppm) Pt (ppb) Pd (ppb) Au (ppb)<br />
Bulk Earth 18,200 1,670 890 257<br />
Primitive mantle 1,960 9 4 1<br />
Bulk cont<strong>in</strong>ental crust 59 1.5 1 1<br />
Upper cont<strong>in</strong>ental crust 47 0.5 0.5 1<br />
Magmatic sulfide <strong>ore</strong> deposits:<br />
Bushveld/Merensky Reef 1,800 4,900 2,100 270<br />
Sudbury, Canada 12,000 ~500 ~500 ~100<br />
Norilsk, Russia 18,000 3,000 1,000 380<br />
Stillwater, USA 250 4,300 14,900 540
Sulfur solubility <strong>in</strong> mid-ocean ridge basalt<br />
O 2- ↔ S 2-<br />
½ S 2 + FeO (melt) =<br />
½ O 2 + FeS (melt)<br />
S <strong>in</strong> melt ≈ ƒS 2½ / ƒO 2<br />
½<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease with T<br />
decrease with p<br />
.<br />
T is 1200°C at the surface, and <strong>in</strong>creases with an adiabatic gradient of 3°C/kbar.<br />
logƒO 2 : QFM-2. Li and Ripley (2002) MD 40:224
Billard Ball Model<br />
(Naldrett 1973)<br />
Density<br />
stratification:<br />
Olv cumulate xtls<br />
(~3.5 g/cm 3 ) float <strong>in</strong><br />
FeS melt (~4,2 g/cm 3 )<br />
and silicate melt<br />
(~2.7 g/cm 3 )
S-Fe-Cu system<br />
First crystallization of Fe-rich monosulfide solution (with Fe, Os, Ir, Ru, Rh)<br />
with the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sulfide liquid Ni- and Cu-rich (with Pd, Pt, Au)
Magmatic sulfide deposits<br />
Barnes and Lightfoot (2005) EG Ann Vol 202
Metal content <strong>in</strong> sulfide melt vs ratio of silicate/sulfide melt: Extreme PGE enrichment<br />
<strong>in</strong> high-R systems such as <strong>in</strong> the Bushveld and Stillwater <strong>in</strong>trusions<br />
9<br />
8<br />
c o = 2000 ppm Ni<br />
D Ni = 100<br />
7<br />
log Pt, Ni (ppb)<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
Norilsk<br />
Stillwater<br />
Merensky Reef<br />
co = 10 ppb Pt<br />
D Pt = 100,000<br />
3<br />
Sudbury<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
log R (Msilicate / Msulfide)
Norilsk annual production:<br />
250.000 t Ni<br />
450.000 t Cu<br />
26 t Pt, 85 t Pd<br />
from ~13 Mt <strong>ore</strong>/year<br />
(~10 b USD)<br />
251 ± 0.5 Ma<br />
Resources:<br />
1.3 Gt @ 1.8% Ni, 3.6% Cu,<br />
4.7 g/t PGE<br />
0
Norilsk, Russia<br />
~250 Ma<br />
1.3 Gt @ 1.8 % Ni<br />
3.6 % Cu<br />
4.7 g/t PGE<br />
Barnes and Lightfoot<br />
(2005) EG Ann Vol 186
Geological map of the Bushveld Complex, South Africa<br />
2054 ±1 Ma<br />
LG-UG: major chromite reefs<br />
M, MML: major magnetite reefs<br />
Scoates and Friedman (2006) EG 103: 466
2780 m<br />
Upper Zone (2130 m) with<br />
titanomagnetite layers<br />
(Ti, V)<br />
Merensky Reef (PGE)<br />
1430 m<br />
UG-2 Reef (PGE)<br />
UG-1 Reef (chromitite)<br />
Steelport Ma<strong>in</strong> Seam<br />
(chromitite)<br />
1450 m
Bushveld Complex (low-ly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>pography)
Bushveld Complex: View from the surround<strong>in</strong>g quartz-rich country rocks
Bushveld Layered Mafic Intrusion (see dip <strong>to</strong> the left)
UG-2, Karee M<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Merensky Reef, A<strong>to</strong>k M<strong>in</strong>e
Merensky Reef at Impala m<strong>in</strong>e (Implats)<br />
right: footwall anorthosite; middle: chromitite, left: pegmatitic pyroxenite with pentlanditepyrrhotite-chalcopyrite.<br />
Length of pho<strong>to</strong>graph is about 15 cm.
UG-2, Maandagshoek
Platreef: Sandsloot Pit near Mokopane (Potgietersrus)<br />
PPL M<strong>in</strong>e, Reserves and <strong>resources</strong>: 1 Gt @ 2.7 g/t PGE
Scoates and Friedman (2006) EG 103: 467
Cr<br />
Pn<br />
Cp<br />
Ph<br />
Merensky Reef: pentlandite [(Ni,Fe)S] (Pn), pyrrhotite [FeS] (Ph), chalcopyrite<br />
[CuFeS 2 ] (Cp), and chromite (Cr) <strong>in</strong> plagioclase-pyroxene matrix (dark), 5x obj.
Hartley M<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
Great Dyke<br />
GD-11-D<br />
(T. Oberthür)<br />
Silicates<br />
(pyroxene, plagioclase)<br />
Molybdenite<br />
[MoS 2 ]<br />
Moncheite [PtTe 2 ]<br />
Cooperite [PtS]<br />
Pentlandite<br />
[(Fe,Ni]S]<br />
Pyrrhotite [FeS]<br />
(conta<strong>in</strong>s up <strong>to</strong><br />
3000 ppm Pd)<br />
Chalcopyrite<br />
[CuFeS 2 ]<br />
50 µm
Creigh<strong>to</strong>n M<strong>in</strong>e Location<br />
1850 ±1 Ma<br />
1.6 Gt @ 1.2% Ni, 1.0 % Cu, 0.8 g/t PGE
Sudbury district: Shatter cones <strong>in</strong> Early Proterozoic Mississagi Formation
Frood-S<strong>to</strong>bie M<strong>in</strong>e
O’Donnell Roast Beds
~10 % ~90 % (mass)<br />
Melt<strong>in</strong>g triggered by<br />
volatile release<br />
Decompression<br />
melt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Cox (1989)
Decompression melt<strong>in</strong>g of the mantle (peridotite)<br />
Dashed curves: Fraction of partial melt
Simk<strong>in</strong> et al. (1989)
Seismic cross section at 21°S (Ancorp Work<strong>in</strong>g Group 1999, Nature 397: 343)
Interpretation diagram for seismic cross section at 21°S<br />
(Ancorp Work<strong>in</strong>g Group 1999, Nature 397: 343)
Hildreth (1981) Gradients <strong>in</strong><br />
silicic magma chambers.<br />
J Geophys Res 86: 10179
The system Qz-Ab-Or-H 2 O: Liquidus curves for given amount of H 2 O (solid l<strong>in</strong>es)<br />
and H 2 O solubility curves (dashed l<strong>in</strong>es) for m<strong>in</strong>imum eutectic compositions.<br />
Holtz and Johannes (1994) Lithos 32: 149-159
Ma<strong>in</strong>-phase granite, Rayong Plu<strong>to</strong>n, Thailand<br />
(K-feldspar megacrystic medium- <strong>to</strong> coarse-gra<strong>in</strong>ed biotite granite)
Microgranite <strong>in</strong>trudes two-phase granite, Belitung Island, Indonesia
Beauvoir,<br />
Massif Central,<br />
France<br />
Albite granite,<br />
argillic alteration<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a clay m<strong>in</strong>e<br />
with<br />
800 g/t Sn<br />
190 g/t Ta<br />
120 g/t Nb<br />
0.31 % Li
Transbaikalia, Russia
Orlovka rare-metal granite, Siberia, Russia
Orlovka rare-metal<br />
granite, Russia:<br />
pegmatite-aplite<br />
layer<strong>in</strong>g with unidirectional<br />
solidification<br />
texture of amazonite<br />
(green microcl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />
megacrysts
Multiple <strong>in</strong>trusion sequence<br />
(Y<strong>in</strong> et al. 1995: 578)
Western Erzgebirge/<br />
Krusne Hory Mts<br />
Variscan granite<br />
sequence (300 Ma)<br />
Tischendorf (1989)
Pilok Sn-W-Ta m<strong>in</strong>e, Thailand: Apical portion (little exposed) of a larger granite system
Beauvoir<br />
Z<strong>in</strong>nwald
Central Africa: Rwanda/Burundi
Kabar<strong>ore</strong> rare-metal pegmatite, Burundi
Kabar<strong>ore</strong> rare-metal<br />
pegmatite, Burundi:<br />
ground sluic<strong>in</strong>g
Artisanal m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for tantalum and t<strong>in</strong>, Burundi
Kabar<strong>ore</strong> rare-metal pegmatite, Burundi: ground sluic<strong>in</strong>g
Kabar<strong>ore</strong> rare-metal pegmatite, Burundi
Rare-metal pegmatite<br />
<strong>in</strong> Madhya Pradesh,<br />
India (under lateritic<br />
cover)
Madhya Pradesh, India: Wash<strong>in</strong>g weathered pegmatite
Möller (1989: 120)
O 2- + Sn 4+ = Sn 2+ + ½O 2
Beauvoir<br />
Z<strong>in</strong>nwald
Boudreau and Keppler (1999) EPSL 165: 193
X w = Moles H 2 O /<br />
(Moles H 2 O + Moles Silicate)<br />
Burnham (1979)
The system Qz-Ab-Or-H 2 O: Liquidus curves for given amount of H 2 O (solid l<strong>in</strong>es)<br />
and H 2 O solubility curves (dashed l<strong>in</strong>es) for m<strong>in</strong>imum eutectic compositions.<br />
Holtz and Johannes (1994) Lithos 32: 149-159
Burnham (1979)
Burnham (1979)
Burnham (1979)
Entwicklungsmuster<br />
Hydroth. Überprägung<br />
Guilbert and Park<br />
(1986), Fig. 5-8
Hydrothermal alteration<br />
potassic<br />
Potassic <strong>to</strong> phyllic:<br />
1.5 KAlSi 3 O 8 + H + =<br />
0.5 KAl 2 AlSi 3 O 10 (OH) 2 + 3 SiO 2 + K +<br />
argillic<br />
sericitic<br />
(phyllic)
Partition<strong>in</strong>g of copper between melt and aqueous fluid <strong>in</strong> the system haplogranite-<br />
H 2 O-HCl-HF at 2 kb, 750°C, Ni-NiO buffer. Keppler and Wyllie (1991) CMP 109: 141
Molybdenum <strong>in</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>e aqueous fluid coxist<strong>in</strong>g with granitic melt (glass)<br />
Webster (1997) GCA 61: 1024
Melt-fluid partition<strong>in</strong>g of sulfur<br />
SO 2<br />
H 2 S<br />
Keppler (1999) Science 284: 1653
Heat and mass transport <strong>in</strong> plu<strong>to</strong>n environments<br />
Cross section of model of convective<br />
fluid flow around a cool<strong>in</strong>g plu<strong>to</strong>n<br />
from 0 <strong>to</strong> 160,000 years:<br />
Temperature distribution (right) and<br />
steady-state dimensionless stream<br />
function (left).<br />
Nor<strong>to</strong>n D, Knight J (1977) Am J Sci<br />
277: 937-981
Stable iso<strong>to</strong>pe<br />
fractionation<br />
Meteoric surface<br />
water: Map of δD<br />
values for North America<br />
„Meteoric water l<strong>in</strong>e“:<br />
δD = 8 δ 18 O + 10 (per mil)
δD of fluid<br />
<strong>in</strong>clusions<br />
vs calculated<br />
δ 18 O values of<br />
hydrothermal<br />
fluids <strong>in</strong> a<br />
variety of <strong>ore</strong><br />
deposits<br />
Taylor HP Jr (1979)
Boulder batholith<br />
with sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
localities (black dots)<br />
and δD con<strong>to</strong>urs for<br />
biotite and hornblende<br />
Idaho batholith with sampl<strong>in</strong>g localities (black dots)<br />
and δD con<strong>to</strong>urs for biotite and hornblende<br />
Taylor HP Jr (1977) J geol Soc London<br />
133: 509-558
Chuquicamata
Panguna (Papua New Gu<strong>in</strong>ea)
Hedenquist et al. (1996) Soc Res Geol Japan
Water
Temperature, °C<br />
Solubility of<br />
quartz<br />
<strong>in</strong> water
COPPER WORLD MINE PRODUCTION 2008 (15.7 Mt)<br />
Other countries 2.0 Mt<br />
Chile 5.6 Mt<br />
Mexico 0.3 Mt<br />
Poland 0.4 Mt<br />
Kazakhstan 0.5 Mt<br />
Zambia 0.6 Mt<br />
Canada 0.6 Mt<br />
Indonesia 0.7 Mt<br />
Russia 0.8 Mt<br />
Australia 0.9 Mt<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a 1.0 Mt<br />
Peru<br />
1.2 Mt<br />
USA 1.3 Mt
Giese et al. (1999) Ext Abstr 4th ISAG, p. 274
Seyfried et al (1994) Jb Univ Stuttgart: 60-71
At 24°S:<br />
13 km elevation contrast<br />
from trench <strong>to</strong> high Andes<br />
Lamb and Davis (2003)<br />
Nature 425: 792-797
Peru–Chile current system<br />
and oceanic upwell<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
sea surface temperatures<br />
July 2002, National Oceanographic<br />
Data Center<br />
Lamb and Davis (2003)<br />
Nature 425: 792-797
Supergene<br />
enrichment<br />
Fe 2+<br />
Cu 2+<br />
Upper limit of water stability<br />
Dissolution of Cu by<br />
ra<strong>in</strong> water and<br />
precipitation at the<br />
groundwater table<br />
Top of groundwater table<br />
The system Cu-Fe-S-O-H<br />
at 25°C and 1 bar.<br />
Total dissolved sulfur = 10 -4 m<br />
From Garrels and Christ (1965: 231)<br />
Lower limit of water stability<br />
The col<strong>ore</strong>d solubility limits of<br />
Au 3+ , Fe 2+ and Cu 2+ are drawn<br />
at 10 -6 m Fe (56 ppb Fe), 10 -6 m Cu<br />
(64 ppb Cu) and 10 -8 m Au (2 ppb Au).
Leached capp<strong>in</strong>g at Butte, Montana<br />
Anderson, <strong>in</strong>: Titley, ed., 1982
Leached capp<strong>in</strong>g at Ch<strong>in</strong>o (Santa Rita), New Mexico, USA<br />
Anderson, <strong>in</strong>: Titley, ed., 1982
Radomiro<br />
Tomic<br />
Chuqui<br />
MM<br />
Calama
Chuquicamata <strong>ore</strong> cluster, Chile<br />
Oyu Tolgoi <strong>ore</strong> cluster, Mongolia
Chuquicamata,<br />
Chile<br />
350.000 t<br />
<strong>ore</strong> with<br />
1 % Cu=<br />
~3.500 t<br />
Cu/day<br />
+<br />
350,000 t<br />
waster
Chuquicamata<br />
smelter: SO 2
Chuquicamata open pit <strong>in</strong> 2003: 2 x 3 km wide, 810 m deep. Total metal value: 45 billion USD<br />
His<strong>to</strong>ric m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g: 1.5 Gt @ 1.5 % Cu + 0.07 % Mo. Reserves: 1.3 Gt @ 0.6-0.7 % Cu.<br />
Current production/day: 350,000 t <strong>ore</strong> (1.0-1.1 % Cu + 200 g/t Mo+Re) plus 350,000 t waste.
Collahuasi, Chile
Quebrada Blanca, Chile
Grasberg<br />
1.2 Gt @<br />
1.4 % Cu,<br />
1.5 ppm Au<br />
Ok Tedi (460 Mt @ 0.72 % Cu, 0.7 ppm Au
OK Tedi pit 1994
OK Tedi pit 1994
Ok Tedi/<br />
Papua New Gu<strong>in</strong>ea<br />
460 Mt @ 0.72 % Cu,<br />
0.7 g/t Au<br />
Gossan <strong>ore</strong>:<br />
30 Mt x 3 g/t Au =<br />
90 t Au<br />
~ 2.5 billion USD<br />
Secondary enrichment<br />
zone:<br />
265 Mt x 0.82 % Cu =<br />
2 Mt Cu<br />
~ 14 billion USD<br />
265 Mt x 0.65 g/t Au =<br />
170 t Au<br />
Davies et al. (1978)<br />
Econ Geol 73: 796-<br />
809<br />
Pro<strong>to</strong>re:<br />
0.2-0.4 % Cu<br />
0.3-0.5 g/t Au
OK Tedi „Erodible dump“ ma<strong>in</strong> site (1994)
OK Tedi „Erodible dump“ (1994)
OK Tedi „Erodible dump“
OK Tedi river near Tabubil
(2-3 Ma)
Grasberg road (Aug 99)
Grasberg road (Aug 99)
Grasberg (Aug 99)
Grasberg (Aug 99)
Grasberg, Irian Jaya, Indonesia (Aug 1999): 3.5 Gt @~1 % Cu, ~1 g/t Au
Copper porphyries:<br />
Normal subduction beneath a<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ental arc: Slab dehydration,<br />
partial melt<strong>in</strong>g of asthenospheric<br />
mantle wedge, basaltic underplat<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
MASH processes <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ental<br />
crust (melt<strong>in</strong>g-assimilation-s<strong>to</strong>ragehomogenization)<br />
Large copper porphyry systems<br />
are <strong>in</strong> a sett<strong>in</strong>g of oblique convergence<br />
of oceanic and cont<strong>in</strong>ental<br />
plate which produces extensional<br />
doma<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> strike-slip systems,<br />
favor<strong>in</strong>g large-scale melt emplacement<br />
<strong>in</strong> the upper crust<br />
Kerrich et al. (2005) EG Anniv Vol: 1112
GOLD WORLD MINE PRODUCTION 2008 (2,330 t)<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a 295 t<br />
Other countries 800 t<br />
South Africa 250 t<br />
USA 230 t<br />
Indonesia 90 t<br />
Canada<br />
100 t<br />
Russia 165 t<br />
Peru 175 t<br />
Australia 225 t
Hedenquist et al. (1996) Soc Res Geol Japan
Orogenic gold deposits:<br />
metamorphic dehydration and focussed fluid flow <strong>in</strong> shear zones<br />
Kerrich et al. (2005) EG Anniv Vol: 1114
Au + 4H 2 S + ½O 2 =<br />
AuHS(H 2 S) 3 + ½H 2 O<br />
Gold solubilty<br />
oxygen-buffered<br />
(pyrrhotite-pyritemagnetite)<br />
and<br />
pH-buffered<br />
(orthoclasemuscovite-quartz)<br />
as typical of<br />
orogenic gold<br />
deposits<br />
Loucks and Mavrogenes<br />
(1999) Nature 284: 2162
Reed (1983) EG 78: 466-485<br />
Seawaterbasalt<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction
(Cu-saturated)<br />
(Cu-undersaturated)<br />
Four stages <strong>in</strong> the evolution<br />
of a volcanic-hosted massive<br />
sulfide deposit (Evans 1992: 74)
Hydrogeologic and tec<strong>to</strong>nic regimes for large-scale groundwater flow<br />
<strong>in</strong> sedimentary bas<strong>in</strong>s: Formation of Pb-Zn, Cu and U deposits<br />
Gravity- or <strong>to</strong>pography-driven flow<br />
Overpressur<strong>in</strong>g on a cont<strong>in</strong>ental marg<strong>in</strong><br />
Thermally-driven convection<br />
Seismic pump<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Tec<strong>to</strong>nically-driven (fold- and thrust belt)<br />
Pressure compartments<br />
Garven and Raffensperger (1997)
The Great Oxidation Event (GOE): 2.4-2.0 Ga<br />
Oxygen from pho<strong>to</strong>synthesis is essentially fixed <strong>in</strong> Fe-oxides<br />
and gypsum. Free oxygen <strong>in</strong> the atmosphere (>10 -5 PAL) only<br />
after the GOE.<br />
(1) Oxygen from oxygenic pho<strong>to</strong>synthesis is fixed <strong>in</strong> BIF<br />
2Fe 2+ + 2H 2 O + ½O 2 = Fe 2 O 3 (s) + 4H +<br />
(2) Anoxygenic pho<strong>to</strong>synthesis by reduction of CO 2<br />
4Fe 2+ + CO 2 + 11H 2 O = 4Fe(OH) 3 (s) + 8H + + [CH 2 O]<br />
The two mechanisms for <strong>formation</strong> of iron <strong>ore</strong> deposits of<br />
the „Banded Iron Formation“ (BIF) family
Cumulative oxygen evolution from pho<strong>to</strong>synthesis with geological time<br />
Model by Schidlowski (1978) Pure Appl Geophysics 116: 234-238
Kle<strong>in</strong> (1997) Nature 385: 25
Banded Iron Formation (BIF)<br />
Model for the deposition of Lake Superior-type iron <strong>formation</strong>s (Holland 1995:181):<br />
Deeper water, enriched <strong>in</strong> Fe 2+ from either volcanic or diagenetic sources, moves<br />
up on<strong>to</strong> a shallow shelf, where iron m<strong>in</strong>erals and SiO 2 are precipitated as a result<br />
of oxidation, mix<strong>in</strong>g, and possibly evaporation.
Kump (2008)<br />
Nature 451: 278
Anoxic and S-poor<br />
oceans<br />
H 2 S-rich<br />
oceans<br />
Oxic<br />
oceans<br />
Anbar (2008) Science 322: 1482
IRON ORE WORLD MINE PRODUCTION 2008 (2.19 Gt)<br />
Other countries 50 Mt<br />
Mexico 12 Mt<br />
Mauritania 12 Mt<br />
Venezuela 20 Mt<br />
Kazakhstan26 Mt<br />
Sweden 27 Mt<br />
Iran 32 Mt<br />
Canada 35 Mt<br />
South Africa 42 Mt<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a 770 Mt<br />
USA 54 Mt<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 80 Mt<br />
Brazil 390 Mt<br />
Russia 110 Mt<br />
India 200 Mt<br />
Feb 2009, F<strong>in</strong>es (64.5 % Fe), fob Europe: 86 USD/t<br />
Australia 330 Mt
Pico de Itabiri<strong>to</strong>, M<strong>in</strong>as Gerais, Brazil: Hard hematite <strong>ore</strong> (subvertical) with soft<br />
hematite <strong>ore</strong> at the Pico m<strong>in</strong>e <strong>to</strong> the left, and Sapecado m<strong>in</strong>e <strong>to</strong> the right
Conceicao<br />
pit
Mount<br />
Tom Price,<br />
Hamersley<br />
Bas<strong>in</strong>,<br />
Western<br />
Australia
Carajas m<strong>in</strong>eral prov<strong>in</strong>ce, Amazonas bas<strong>in</strong>, Brazil
Central part of the Carajas m<strong>in</strong>eral prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
Serra Pelada (Au-Pd-Pt)<br />
N1<br />
N4<br />
N5<br />
Carajas<br />
Parauapebas<br />
Serra Leste<br />
Curionopolis<br />
Aguas Claras (Cu)<br />
Serra Sul<br />
Sossego (Cu-Au)<br />
10 km<br />
Landsat ETM7+ (August 1999)
Aeromagnetic map<br />
Carajas<br />
Parauapebas
2 Gt @ 67 % Fe<br />
4 Gt @ 64 % Fe<br />
Total resource:<br />
50 Gt @ >60 % Fe
M<strong>in</strong>a N4E
N5E pit
Banded iron <strong>formation</strong> (waste)
Greens<strong>to</strong>ne<br />
Serra Sul, Orebody A
A B C D 4 Gt @ 64 % Fe<br />
measured
D <strong>ore</strong>body: 25,000 m drilled (200 x 200 m)
Johannesburg
Quartz-pebble meta-conglomerate, Ventersdorp, 2.8 Ga, Witwatersrand, S-Africa
Polished section (3 mm length):<br />
Elsburg m<strong>in</strong>e, pyrite pebbles, uran<strong>in</strong>ite-thucholite, gold
Polished section (3 mm length):<br />
Elsburg m<strong>in</strong>e, pyrite pebbles, uran<strong>in</strong>ite-thucholite, gold
Uranium Iso<strong>to</strong>pic Abundances<br />
Solar system uranium <strong>to</strong>day<br />
238<br />
U 99.2745 %<br />
235<br />
U 0.7202 ± 0.0006 %<br />
OKLO 235 U<br />
First measurement : 0.7171 % (a diff of 0.42 %)<br />
Typical value <strong>in</strong> Oklo fossil reac<strong>to</strong>rs: 0.65 %<br />
Lowest measurement : 0.29 %
Mounana<br />
Ore process<strong>in</strong>g plant
Oklo Today<br />
M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ceased <strong>in</strong> 1979
Criticality: ~1950 Ma<br />
2.6-3.0 Ga<br />
2.0 Ga<br />
Pourcelot and Gauthier-Lafaye (1999) Chem Geol 157: 156
Pourcelot and Gauthier-Lafaye (1999) Chem Geol 157: 157
10<br />
13<br />
14<br />
12<br />
9<br />
2<br />
1
Zone 10<br />
Doleritic<br />
Dyke<br />
Zone 13<br />
Zone 14
Zone 2 Entrance <strong>to</strong> Zone 15
F B Pelites<br />
F A Sands<strong>to</strong>nes<br />
Zone 15
Reac<strong>to</strong>r Requirements<br />
Uranium<br />
Reac<strong>to</strong>r: 235 U 1-10 %<br />
Natural 235 U 0.72%<br />
U Fuel Quality<br />
Free of neutron<br />
poisons (Cd, REE)<br />
FISSION REACTOR<br />
Modera<strong>to</strong>r<br />
Thermalised neutrons<br />
H 2 O or C<br />
Reac<strong>to</strong>r Size<br />
Able <strong>to</strong> utilise neutrons<br />
Fuel assemblage vol of<br />
cubic metres
Reac<strong>to</strong>r Requirements<br />
Uranium<br />
Reac<strong>to</strong>r: 235 U 1-10 %<br />
Natural 235 U 0.72%<br />
Oklo ~3%<br />
U Fuel Quality<br />
Free of neutron<br />
poisons (Cd, REE) √<br />
FISSION REACTOR<br />
Modera<strong>to</strong>r<br />
Thermalised neutrons<br />
H 2 O or C<br />
Reac<strong>to</strong>r Size<br />
Able <strong>to</strong> utilise neutrons<br />
Fuel assemblage vol of<br />
cubic metres √
Oklo: a “Breeder” reac<strong>to</strong>r<br />
A<strong>to</strong>mic<br />
Number<br />
(Z)<br />
Mass<br />
Number<br />
(Z+N)<br />
239<br />
Pu<br />
2.4x10 4 a<br />
β −<br />
~50 % of the <strong>to</strong>tal energy<br />
released at Oklo (~15 GWa)<br />
is from breed<strong>in</strong>g of 239 Pu<br />
and decay <strong>to</strong> 235 U<br />
α<br />
239<br />
Np<br />
2.355 d β<br />
−<br />
235<br />
U<br />
n<br />
n<br />
236<br />
U<br />
237<br />
U<br />
238<br />
U<br />
239<br />
U<br />
7.04x10 8 a<br />
α<br />
4.5x10 9 a<br />
23.5 m<br />
Thermal Fission<br />
fast<br />
fission
74<br />
W<br />
75<br />
Re<br />
42<br />
Mo<br />
60<br />
Nd<br />
19<br />
K<br />
20<br />
Ca<br />
21<br />
Sc<br />
22<br />
Ti<br />
23<br />
V<br />
24<br />
Cr<br />
25<br />
Mn<br />
26<br />
Fe<br />
27<br />
Co<br />
28<br />
Ni<br />
29<br />
Cu<br />
30<br />
Zn<br />
31<br />
Ga<br />
32<br />
Ge<br />
33<br />
As<br />
34<br />
Se<br />
35<br />
Br<br />
36<br />
Kr<br />
37<br />
Rb<br />
38<br />
Sr<br />
39<br />
Y<br />
40<br />
Zr<br />
41<br />
Nb<br />
43<br />
Tc<br />
44<br />
Ru<br />
45<br />
Rh<br />
46<br />
Pd<br />
47<br />
Ag<br />
48<br />
Cd<br />
49<br />
Sb<br />
50<br />
Sn<br />
51<br />
Sb<br />
52<br />
Te<br />
53<br />
I<br />
54<br />
Xe<br />
55<br />
Cs<br />
56<br />
Ba<br />
72<br />
Hf<br />
73<br />
Ta<br />
76<br />
Os<br />
77<br />
Ir<br />
78<br />
Pt<br />
79<br />
Au<br />
80<br />
Hg<br />
81<br />
Tl<br />
82<br />
Pb<br />
83<br />
Bi<br />
84<br />
Po<br />
85<br />
At<br />
86<br />
Rn<br />
11<br />
Na<br />
12<br />
Mg<br />
3<br />
Li<br />
4<br />
Be<br />
1<br />
H<br />
13<br />
Al<br />
14<br />
Si<br />
15<br />
P<br />
16<br />
S<br />
17<br />
Cl<br />
18<br />
Ar<br />
87<br />
Fr<br />
88<br />
Ra<br />
57-<br />
71<br />
57<br />
La<br />
58<br />
Ce<br />
61<br />
Pm<br />
62<br />
Sm<br />
63<br />
Eu<br />
64<br />
Gd<br />
65<br />
Tb<br />
66<br />
Dy<br />
67<br />
Ho<br />
68<br />
Er<br />
69<br />
Tm<br />
70<br />
Yb<br />
71<br />
Lu<br />
59<br />
Pr<br />
89<br />
Ac<br />
90<br />
Th<br />
92<br />
U<br />
93<br />
Np<br />
94<br />
Pu<br />
95<br />
Am<br />
96<br />
Cu<br />
97<br />
Bk<br />
98<br />
Cf<br />
99<br />
Es<br />
100<br />
Fm<br />
102<br />
No<br />
103<br />
Lw<br />
91<br />
Pa<br />
101<br />
Md<br />
Reta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
Mobilized<br />
Partially reta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
Retention of Fission Products at OKLO<br />
Locally redistributed<br />
5<br />
B<br />
6<br />
C<br />
7<br />
N<br />
8<br />
O<br />
9<br />
F<br />
10<br />
Ne<br />
2<br />
He
Manganese nodules <strong>in</strong> siliceous ooze (Clarion-Clipper<strong>to</strong>n zone, East Pacific )
Manganese nodules and crusts:<br />
Hydrogenetic <strong>formation</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />
deep sea with extremely low<br />
clastic deposition.<br />
Growth rate of a few mm/Ma<br />
allows concentration of a wide<br />
range of elements from<br />
seawater (Mn, Fe, Ni, Co, Cu,<br />
Pb, Ba, Mo, V, Ti, Pt, Au) by<br />
adsorptive and redox processes.
Ore deposits form <strong>in</strong> any aqueous environment: the lower the temperature,<br />
the m<strong>ore</strong> water is needed <strong>to</strong> transport the amount of metals for enrichment <strong>to</strong><br />
<strong>ore</strong> level (up <strong>to</strong> 100 million times <strong>in</strong> Mn nodules with respect <strong>to</strong> sea water)<br />
Lehmann et al. (2000) Int J Earth Sci 89: 286
Ice on Mars,<br />
Phoenic Mission;<br />
Smith et al. (2009)<br />
Science 325: 60