22.01.2014 Views

Techniques d'observation spectroscopique d'astéroïdes

Techniques d'observation spectroscopique d'astéroïdes

Techniques d'observation spectroscopique d'astéroïdes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.8 Asteroid spectra and the best two matches derived from a comparison with laboratory<br />

spectra:(a) spectrum of Apophis and the spectrum of a simulant Lunar<br />

soil, (b) spectrum of Apophis and the spectrum of a particulate sample from<br />

the Hamlet meteorite, (c) de-reddened spectrum of Apophis and the spectrum<br />

of a particulate sample from the Cherokee Springs meteorite, (d) de-reddened<br />

spectrum of Apophis and the spectrum of a particulate sample from the Cat<br />

Mountain meteorite, (e) spectrum of 1996 FG3 and the spectrum of a sample<br />

from the meteorite Sete Lagoas, and (f) spectrum of 1996 FG3 and the spectrum<br />

of a sample from the Murchison meteorite heated to 1000 ◦ C. . . . . . . . . . . 87<br />

tel-00785991, version 1 - 7 Feb 2013<br />

6.1 a) The visible [Binzel et al., 2004b] and the NIR spectrum of (1917) Cuyo; b)<br />

a polynomial fit of the V+NIR spectrum of (1917) Cuyo compared with the<br />

theoretical spectra of R and Sr types; c) reflectance spectrum of (1917) Cuyo<br />

and the closest match resulting from meteorite comparison - H3-4 ordinary<br />

chondrite Dhajala; d) De-reddened spectrum of (1917) Cuyo and the closest<br />

match resulting from meteorite comparison, H6 ordinary chondrite Lancon. . . 96<br />

6.2 a) The visible [Vernazza, 2006] and the NIR spectra of (8567) 1996 HW1; b) a<br />

polynomial fit of the V+NIR spectrum of (8567) 1996 HW1 compared with the<br />

theoretical spectra of S and Sq types; c) reflectance spectrum of (8567) 1996<br />

and the closest match resulting from the meteorite comparison - the LL4 ordinary<br />

chondrite Hamlet; d) de-reddened spectrum of (8567) 1996 HW1 and the<br />

closest match resulting from meteorite comparison -the LL6 ordinary chondrite<br />

Cherokee Springs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98<br />

6.3 a) The visible [Binzel et al., 2004b] and the NIR spectra of (16960) 1998 QS52;<br />

b) a polynomial fit of the V+NIR spectrum of (16960) 1998 QS52 compared<br />

with the theoretical spectra of Sr, Sq and Q types; c) the reflectance spectrum<br />

of (16960) 1998 QS52 and the closest fit resulting from spectral comparison<br />

- the L4 ordinary chondrite Saratov; d) the de-reddened spectrum of (16960)<br />

1998 QS52 and the closest fit resulting from meteorite comparison - the LL4<br />

ordinary chondrite Hamlet. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100<br />

6.4 a) The NIR spectrum of (188452) 2004 HE62 normalized to 1.25 µm; b) a<br />

polynomial fit for the spectrum of (188452) 2004 HE62 compared with the<br />

theoretical spectra of Sr and Sv types; c) the reflectance spectrum of (188452)<br />

2004 HE62 and the closest fit resulting from meteorite spectra comparison -<br />

the L6 ordinary chondrite La Criolla; d) the de-reddened spectrum of (188452)<br />

2004 HE62 and the closest matches resulting from meteorite comparison - the<br />

H6 ordinary chondrite Nanjemoy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!