OES Annual Report 2012 - Ocean Energy Systems

OES Annual Report 2012 - Ocean Energy Systems OES Annual Report 2012 - Ocean Energy Systems

21.01.2014 Views

129 05 / DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL OCEAN ENERGY INDUSTRY: PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS AND COST REDUCTIONS After A Decade Of Technology Push Many lessons that can be applied to these future projects have been learned from what has essentially been a push to commercialize marine renewable energy generation devices. The multi-year operation of Siemens/MCT SeaGen in Strangford Lough, Northern Ireland, has not only demonstrated technical feasibility but, more generally, the concept of a megawatt-scale marine renewable energy generator that can be installed and operated for long periods. As 2012 closes, at least two wave technologies, and three other tidal generator companies have accumulated experience with these large–scale generators. The scale of prototype trials, the time to iterate technological developments and demands for accessing marine sites have been challenges addressed by the creation of permitted test centres with shared infrastructure. Despite this support, development rates have been slower than anticipated, in large measure due to financing difficulties which has also made supply chain development challenging. Potential tidal and wave converter customers or investors, now familiar with the “accepted” design of wind turbines, express concern that the wide range of device designs demonstrate an immaturity in the marine renewable energy industry. This raises concerns about how to pick a winner. Most customers need to see the integrated system that makes the device into a power plant they could use. These customers want to know: does it reliably supply electricity? Are the project risks understood? Is the electricity affordable? Is this a viable hedge against long-term cost-of-fuel increases? The interests of the integrator/manufacturers Some of the early device demonstration successes have attracted strategic partners with a background in manufacturing, system integration and sales in the power market. In a few cases, these early device demonstrations have led to partnerships with utilities. These relationships extend from access to components, access to design, testing or development experience, all the way to outright ownership by the manufacturers or utilities. In most cases manufacturers have had a real interest in moving to a stage where orders for series-production units can be expected. In some cases manufacturers are deciding to focus on the core of the devices, as closest to their existing industry experience, believing that other parts of the single device “system” needs to be significantly developed by others with better experience and capacity. Emergence of a market pull Climate change action agendas have resulted in progressive targets for renewables development. In some countries a drive for energy security has added to this an imperative for resource diversity. In others it has been a focus on new marine industrial and economic opportunity that drove initial investment in technology development and more recently the transition to create economic value out of the delivery of complete clean marine electricity solutions. These market-pull initiatives have resulted in ratepayers investing in the success of pilot projects – the rate is only paid for what the project delivers. As experience drives down cost, these market support mechanisms are expected to adjust so that ratepayer support for later projects can be decreased ultimately to the point where marine renewable energy promotes will compete equally with other renewables. With the energy densities of marine resources and ongoing reductions of lifecycle costs, these projects may ultimately be competitive with traditional forms of energy generation. Market pull is likely to stimulate formation of supply chains that will work together through all stages, eventually delivering the scale at which marine renewable energy is that competitive choice. The issue is now one of demonstrating integrated systems: how projects are sited and permitted; how they are designed and installed, how they are operated and maintained, what their availability as a “plant” is and how the power output meets power interconnection requirements.

130 For marine electricity The focus is shifting toward demonstration of reliable and scalable projects that can deliver marine electricity of value to the consumer. It must be demonstrated, even through these initial trials, that it will be practical for a significant part of the power portfolio to come from marine renewable energy. More importantly, the potential for improvements in operations and costs must be demonstrated to make the case for marine renewable energy as a reliable and competitive electricity resource. What must marine renewable energy demonstrate? It was suggested earlier that there are significant parts of an industrial-scale project that may not be addressed in device–level demonstrations. This includes some of the following aspects: Technical solutions: Balance of Plant The functionality of devices may have been demonstrated, but plans for utility-scale installations and their servicing can be expected to drive the development of new approaches to: foundations, installation and service vessels, cable interconnection and a host of other technical and operational interfaces that integrate those generation systems into a commercial plant. Generation systems For marine renewable energy plants to be accepted market solutions, they must demonstrate that they can meet utility interconnection requirements. While a system may be blind to a small demonstration, experience with pilots large enough to attract system administrator interest is critical. System control and data delivery needs to meet utility industry standards. Resource forecasting, plant availability and energy forecasts have to be suitable as planning and operating tools. Balance of Project The scale change from device trials to prototype arrays will require new responses from regulators, supply chain, manufacturers and financiers. It is critical that this prototype value chain be demonstrated if the scalability of marine energy is to be pursued. CAPEX acceptability System capital costs have to reduce by almost 2/3 to compete wind. 9 This reduction in CAPEX has to be achieved by incorporation of new innovations in project design and development, learnings from doing that eliminate costs, and economies of scale that come from series production of components and from maximizing deployments from project infrastructure. This trend will only be driven by a focus on the needs of multi-device projects. OPEX viability Operations and maintenance expenditures also have to be reduced by almost 2/3. Significant improvements will come through integrations of operations and maintenance planning into equipment selection or design, availability of service infrastructure that matches project needs for planned and emergency service and through development of operating experience and the efficiencies that that will bring. Only with largerscale deployments will the necessity to refine operations and maintenance come to a head. Conclusion While there is certainly a lot of room for proving and improving of marine renewable energy technologies, it is clear that focusing on prototyping an industrial approach will drive those improvements and the emergence of a host of enabling technologies and operational approaches. The necessary technology transfer, supply chain development, customer engagement, access to the financial sector and political support depends on that demonstration of what this industry will look like and what it can offer. 9 www.lowcarboninnovation.co.uk/document.php? ANNUAL REPORT 2012

130<br />

For marine electricity<br />

The focus is shifting toward demonstration of reliable and scalable projects that can deliver marine electricity<br />

of value to the consumer. It must be demonstrated, even through these initial trials, that it will be practical<br />

for a significant part of the power portfolio to come from marine renewable energy. More importantly, the<br />

potential for improvements in operations and costs must be demonstrated to make the case for marine<br />

renewable energy as a reliable and competitive electricity resource.<br />

What must marine renewable energy demonstrate?<br />

It was suggested earlier that there are significant parts of an industrial-scale project that may not be<br />

addressed in device–level demonstrations. This includes some of the following aspects:<br />

Technical solutions:<br />

Balance of Plant<br />

The functionality of devices may have been demonstrated, but plans for utility-scale installations and their<br />

servicing can be expected to drive the development of new approaches to: foundations, installation and<br />

service vessels, cable interconnection and a host of other technical and operational interfaces that integrate<br />

those generation systems into a commercial plant.<br />

Generation systems<br />

For marine renewable energy plants to be accepted market solutions, they must demonstrate that they<br />

can meet utility interconnection requirements. While a system may be blind to a small demonstration,<br />

experience with pilots large enough to attract system administrator interest is critical. System control and<br />

data delivery needs to meet utility industry standards. Resource forecasting, plant availability and energy<br />

forecasts have to be suitable as planning and operating tools.<br />

Balance of Project<br />

The scale change from device trials to prototype arrays will require new responses from regulators, supply<br />

chain, manufacturers and financiers. It is critical that this prototype value chain be demonstrated if the<br />

scalability of marine energy is to be pursued.<br />

CAPEX acceptability<br />

System capital costs have to reduce by almost 2/3 to compete wind. 9 This reduction in CAPEX has to be<br />

achieved by incorporation of new innovations in project design and development, learnings from doing<br />

that eliminate costs, and economies of scale that come from series production of components and from<br />

maximizing deployments from project infrastructure. This trend will only be driven by a focus on the needs<br />

of multi-device projects.<br />

OPEX viability<br />

Operations and maintenance expenditures also have to be reduced by almost 2/3. Significant improvements<br />

will come through integrations of operations and maintenance planning into equipment selection or design,<br />

availability of service infrastructure that matches project needs for planned and emergency service and<br />

through development of operating experience and the efficiencies that that will bring. Only with largerscale<br />

deployments will the necessity to refine operations and maintenance come to a head.<br />

Conclusion<br />

While there is certainly a lot of room for proving and improving of marine renewable energy technologies,<br />

it is clear that focusing on prototyping an industrial approach will drive those improvements and the<br />

emergence of a host of enabling technologies and operational approaches. The necessary technology<br />

transfer, supply chain development, customer engagement, access to the financial sector and political<br />

support depends on that demonstration of what this industry will look like and what it can offer.<br />

9<br />

www.lowcarboninnovation.co.uk/document.php?<br />

ANNUAL<br />

REPORT <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!