Semantic Annotation for Process Models: - Department of Computer ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

232 BIBLIOGRAPHY [114] Ikujiro Nonaka and Hirotaka Takeuchi. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, 1995. [115] Anna Gunhild Nysetvold and John Krogstie. Assessing business process modeling languages using a generic quality framework. Advanced Topics in Database Research Volume 5 pages 84–101, Idea Group Publishing. Hershey, PA, USA, 2006. [116] OASIS. Business Process Execution Language for Web Services (BPEL4WS). http://xml.coverpages.org/bpm.html#bpel4ws, Last Visited: 2007.4.5. [117] OMG. MDA guide version 1.0.1. http://www.omg.org/docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf, Last Visited: 2004.1.10. [118] AIFB (Institute of Applied Informatics and University of Karlsruhe Formal Description Methods). KAON2. http://kaon2.semanticweb.org/, Last Visited: 2007.7.17. [119] IEEE. IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1991. [120] National Institute of Standards and Technology. Process Specification Language (PSL) core. http://www.mel.nist.gov/psl/psl-ontology/pslcore_page.html, 2004. [121] Charles Kay Ogden and Ivor Armstrong Richards. The Meaning of Meaning. London: Kegan Paul, 1923. [122] Antoni Olivé. Conceptual schema-centric development: A grand challenge for information systems research. In Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2005) pages 1–15, Porto, Portugal. LNCS 3520, Springer-Verlag, 2005. [123] OMG. Model driven architecture. http://www.omg.org/mda/, Last Visited: 2007.6.7. [124] OMG. Meta Object Facility (MOF) specification version 1.4.1 formal/05-05-05. http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/05-05-05.pdf, Last Visited: 2007.6.7. [125] OMG. Unified modeling language. http://www.uml.org/, Last Visited: 2007.6.7. [126] BPMI & OMG. Business process management initiative. http://www.bmpi.org/, Last Visited: 2007.6.7. [127] Ontotext.com. KIM platform. http://www.ontotext.com/kim/introduction.html, Last Visited: 2007.6.7. [128] Andreas L. Opdahl and Brian Henderson-Sellers. Ontological evaluation of the UML using the Bunge-Wand-Weber model. Software and Systems Modeling, 1(1):43–67, 2002.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 233 [129] OASIS Cover Pages. Event-driven Process Chain Markup Language (EPML) for business process modeling. http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2003-11-21-a.html, Last Visited: 2007.7.17. [130] Hervé Panetto, Giuseppe Berio, Khalid Benali, Nacer Boudjlida, and Micha˝el Petit. A unified enterprise modeling language for enhanced interoperability of enterprise models. In Proc. of the 11th IFAC INCOM2004 Symposium,, 2004. [131] Massimo Paolucci, Naveen Srinivasan, Katia Sycara, and Takuya Nishimura. Towards a semantic choreography of web. In Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2003), pages 22–26, 2003. [132] Jinsoo Park and Sudha Ram. Information systems interoperability: What lies beneath? ACM Transactions on Information System, 22(4):595–632, 2004. [133] Abhĳit A. Patil, Swapna A. Oundhakar, Amit P. Sheth, and Kunal Verma. METERO-S Web service annotation framework. In Proc. of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2004), pages 553–562, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press, 2004. [134] Jean-Christophe R. Pazzaglia and Suzanne M. Embury. Bottom-up integration of ontologies in a database context. In Alexander Borgida, Vinay K. Chaudhri, Martin Staudt (Eds.): Proc. of the 5th INternational Workshop on Knowledge Represenation Meets Databases (KRDB 1998): Innovative Application Programming and Query Interfaces, pages 7.1–7.7. Seattle, Washington, USA, 1998. [135] Adam Pease. Object Model Working Group (OMWG) Core Plan Representation, version 4. Technical report, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, 1998. [136] Borislav Popov, Atanas Kiryakov, Angel Kirilov, Dimitar Manov, Damyan Ognyanoff, and Mirosla Goranov. KIM - semantic annotation platfrom. In Proc. of the 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2003), pages 834–849, 2003. [137] Walter D. Potter and Larry Kerschberg. A unified approach to modeling knowledge and data. Data and Knowledge (DS-2), pages 265 – 292, 1988. [138] ATHENA Project. Deliverable DA1.3.1 report on methodology description and guidelines definition. http://www.athena-ip.org/, Last Visited: 2005.12.17. [139] European Project. Athena (advanced technologies for interoperability of heterogeneous enterprise networks and their applications) project (ist-2003-2004). http://www.athena-ip.org, Last Visited: 2007.12.17. [140] European Project. Interop (interoperability research for networked enterprises applications and software) project (ist-508011). http://www.athena-ip.org, Last Visited: 2007.7.27. [141] INTEROP Project. Deliverable DEM 1 UEML2.1. http://www.interop-noe.org/, Last Visited: 2005.7.17.
Page 1 and 2:
Yun Lin Semantic Annotation for Pro
Page 3:
To MY BELOVED HUSBAND HAO DING AND
Page 6 and 7:
ii The proposed approach has been i
Page 8 and 9:
iv CONTENTS 3 State of the Art 31 3
Page 10 and 11:
vi CONTENTS 7.5.2 Semantic reasonin
Page 12 and 13:
viii CONTENTS H PSAM Annotation Res
Page 14 and 15:
x LIST OF FIGURES 6.1 System module
Page 16 and 17:
xii LIST OF FIGURES
Page 18 and 19:
xiv LIST OF TABLES
Page 20 and 21:
xvi PREFACE My tremendous gratitude
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1 Introduction Business pro
Page 25 and 26:
1.2. PROBLEM STATEMENT AND RESEARCH
Page 27 and 28:
1.4. APPROACH AND SCOPE 7 1.4.1 Sem
Page 29 and 30:
1.6. MAJOR CONTRIBUTIONS 9 1.6 Majo
Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 2 Problem Setting In this c
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 2.1: Zachman Enterprise Arch
Page 35 and 36:
2.2. MODELING BASIS 15 meta-model o
Page 37 and 38:
2.3. INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SEMANT
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
2.4. SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY 23 3
Page 45 and 46:
2.5. BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL 25 2.5
Page 47 and 48:
2.6. PROCESS KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT 2
Page 49 and 50:
2.7. SUMMARY 29 • Creation or imp
Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 3 State of the Art This cha
Page 53 and 54:
3.1. PROCESS MODELING LANGUAGES 33
Page 55 and 56:
3.1. PROCESS MODELING LANGUAGES 35
Page 57 and 58:
Table 3.1: Modeling constructs of d
Page 59 and 60:
3.2. SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY AND
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Representation primitives Process P
Page 69 and 70:
3.3. GOAL MODELING 49 From the surv
Page 71 and 72:
3.4. SEMANTIC ANNOTATION METHODS AN
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
3.6. SUMMARY 59 In the goal modelin
Page 81:
Part II Design and Application 61
Page 84 and 85:
64 CHAPTER 4. SEMANTIC ANNOTATION F
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
84 CHAPTER 5. GOAL ANNOTATION proce
Page 106 and 107:
86 CHAPTER 5. GOAL ANNOTATION in a
Page 108 and 109:
88 CHAPTER 5. GOAL ANNOTATION • i
Page 110 and 111:
90 CHAPTER 5. GOAL ANNOTATION 5.5 G
Page 112 and 113:
92 CHAPTER 5. GOAL ANNOTATION
Page 114 and 115:
94 CHAPTER 6. PRO-SEAT (PROCESS SEM
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
100 CHAPTER 6. PRO-SEAT (PROCESS SE
Page 122 and 123:
102 CHAPTER 6. PRO-SEAT (PROCESS SE
Page 124 and 125:
104 CHAPTER 7. EXEMPLAR STUDIES AND
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 8 Quality Evaluation of the
Page 151 and 152:
8.2. SETTING FOR THE QUALITY EVALUA
Page 153 and 154:
8.2. SETTING FOR THE QUALITY EVALUA
Page 155 and 156:
8.3. QUALITY ANALYSIS 135 to those
Page 157 and 158:
8.3. QUALITY ANALYSIS 137 annotatio
Page 159 and 160:
8.3. QUALITY ANALYSIS 139 • G1 -
Page 161 and 162:
8.5. SUMMARY 141 3. Semantic annota
Page 163 and 164:
Chapter 9 Validation of Applicabili
Page 165 and 166:
9.1. VALIDATION DESIGN 145 - RE3.3
Page 167 and 168:
9.2. SWRL FORMULATION 147 Table 9.1
Page 169 and 170:
9.2. SWRL FORMULATION 149 RE3.2 RE3
Page 171 and 172:
9.3. APPLICABILITY VALIDATION IN AN
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
9.4. DISCUSSION ON RESULTS OF THE V
Page 181 and 182:
9.4. DISCUSSION ON RESULTS OF THE V
Page 183:
Part IV Synopsis 163
Page 186 and 187:
166 CHAPTER 10. CONCLUSIONS AND FUT
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 193 and 194:
Appendix A BPMN This chapter presen
Page 195 and 196:
A.3. CONNECTING OBJECTS 175 Figure
Page 197 and 198:
A.6. BPMN META-MODEL TREE IN METIS
Page 199 and 200:
Appendix B EEML 2005 The language v
Page 201 and 202: B.2. RECOURSES MODELING DOMAIN 181
Page 203 and 204: Appendix C SCOR SCOR — Supply Cha
Page 205 and 206: C.2. LEVEL 2 TOOLKIT 185 Level 1 Me
Page 207 and 208: C.3. LEVEL 3 PROCESS ELEMENTS 187 F
Page 209 and 210: Appendix D Algorithm for Semi-Autom
Page 211 and 212: 191 Algorithm 1 Goal Annotation Alg
Page 213 and 214: Algorithm 4 Goal Annotation Algorit
Page 215 and 216: 195 Algorithm 6 Goal Annotation Alg
Page 217 and 218: Appendix E GUI of Pro-SEAT The prop
Page 219 and 220: 199 Figure E.3: Mapping meta-model
Page 221 and 222: 201 Figure E.5: Goal annotation UI
Page 223 and 224: Appendix F Analysis of the Annotati
Page 225 and 226: F.2. INTEGRATION APPLICATION BASED
Page 227 and 228: F.2. INTEGRATION APPLICATION BASED
Page 229 and 230: Appendix G Schema of PSAM and SWRL
Page 231 and 232: G.1. PSAM IN OWL 211
Page 233 and 234: G.2. RULE DEFINITIONS IN SWRL 213
Page 235 and 236: G.2. RULE DEFINITIONS IN SWRL 215
Page 237 and 238: Appendix H Annotation Results in Ex
Page 239 and 240: H.2. ANNOTATION OF PM B1 219 xmlns:
Page 241 and 242: H.3. ANNOTATION OF PM B2 221 Av
Page 243 and 244: Bibliography [1] ALTOVA. What is th
Page 245 and 246: BIBLIOGRAPHY 225 [26] Dov Dori. Why
Page 247 and 248: BIBLIOGRAPHY 227 [52] Ian Horrocks.
Page 249 and 250: BIBLIOGRAPHY 229 [78] John Krogstie
Page 251: BIBLIOGRAPHY 231 [102] Diana Maynar
Page 255 and 256: BIBLIOGRAPHY 235 [157] Colette Roll
Page 257 and 258: BIBLIOGRAPHY 237 [185] Systems Thin
Page 259: BIBLIOGRAPHY 239 [214] John.A. Zach
show all

Semantic Annotation for Process Models: - Department of Computer ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?