The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...
The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...
The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Contributions <strong>and</strong> implications<br />
apply them in their pr<strong>of</strong>essional career. This is another way <strong>of</strong> bringing about crosscommunity<br />
<strong>learning</strong> through PBL.<br />
To the CSCW field, the thesis provides new knowledge about how data stored in<br />
collaboration tools through a <strong>work</strong> practice, can be utilized to support that <strong>work</strong> practice<br />
through retrospective <strong>reflection</strong>. Framed in state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art industry practice for project<br />
retrospectives in SE project <strong>work</strong>, current usage <strong>of</strong> lightweight collaboration tools in<br />
project <strong>work</strong> (e.g. as manifest in Contribution 2), theory on human <strong>reflection</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>learning</strong>, <strong>and</strong> a focus on the project process (e.g. trajectory <strong>and</strong> sub-trajectories) as the<br />
main object <strong>of</strong> <strong>reflection</strong>, some key points are established. Firstly, day-to-day usage <strong>of</strong><br />
collaboration tools in a project determines what aspects (<strong>and</strong> challenges) <strong>of</strong> project <strong>work</strong><br />
become reflected in the tools. Secondly, particular tool features are useful for access to<br />
<strong>and</strong> navigation <strong>of</strong> historical data stored in (or by) the tools in the context <strong>of</strong><br />
retrospective <strong>reflection</strong>. This includes chronological overview <strong>of</strong> the project process <strong>and</strong><br />
easy access from points in the process to project artifacts (e.g. the project product) in<br />
their there-<strong>and</strong>-then state. Thirdly, the organization <strong>of</strong> the retrospective <strong>reflection</strong><br />
activity in which the historical data are used, should be designed to incorporate<br />
individual as well as collaborative knowledge construction <strong>and</strong> attend to „facts‟ as well<br />
as „feelings‟ about the project process. Fourthly, if collaboration tools are given a dual<br />
role in a <strong>work</strong> practice, supporting day-to-day <strong>work</strong> as well as retrospective <strong>reflection</strong><br />
on that <strong>work</strong>, the effect on the <strong>work</strong> practice should be considered <strong>and</strong> preferably<br />
empirically investigated (e.g. looking for signs <strong>of</strong> increased or improved information<br />
sharing or information hoarding).<br />
For tool designers, these key points can be used to inform the design <strong>of</strong> collaboration<br />
tools with the aim <strong>of</strong> making the tools useful for retrospective <strong>reflection</strong>.<br />
For researchers analyzing project <strong>work</strong> settings with the aim <strong>of</strong> identifying ways <strong>of</strong><br />
supporting the <strong>work</strong> practice, the key points illuminate the option <strong>of</strong> introducing or<br />
redesigning retrospective <strong>reflection</strong> activities, e.g. by utilizing collaboration tools as a<br />
resource for the <strong>reflection</strong>. In the field <strong>of</strong> S<strong>of</strong>tware Engineering in particular, the<br />
proposed use <strong>of</strong> collaboration tools can be considered an answer to one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
challenges to having SE pr<strong>of</strong>essionals actually prioritize retrospective <strong>reflection</strong> on their<br />
projects: getting access to relevant data to aid the <strong>reflection</strong> process.<br />
59