- Page 1 and 2:
Birgit Rognebakke Krogstie The work
- Page 3 and 4:
Figure 1: Most used terms in the th
- Page 5 and 6:
Abstract In project based learning,
- Page 7 and 8:
Preface This thesis is submitted to
- Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgements I would like to th
- Page 11 and 12:
Contents 1 Introduction ...........
- Page 13 and 14:
Research paper P4 135 Research pape
- Page 15 and 16:
Figure 17: Support for learning in
- Page 17:
Abbreviations CSCL CSCW IS NITH NTN
- Page 20 and 21: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 22 and 23: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 24 and 25: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 26 and 27: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 28 and 29: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 30 and 31: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 32 and 33: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 34 and 35: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 37 and 38: 3 Software Engineering student proj
- Page 39 and 40: Software Engineering student projec
- Page 41 and 42: Software Engineering student projec
- Page 43 and 44: Software Engineering student projec
- Page 45: Software Engineering student projec
- Page 48 and 49: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 50 and 51: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 52 and 53: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 55 and 56: 5 Results This chapter presents an
- Page 57 and 58: Results The background of P2 is a l
- Page 59 and 60: Results project management and coll
- Page 61 and 62: Results proposed in P5 was to allow
- Page 63 and 64: Results Analysis of the results sho
- Page 65 and 66: Results archives are found to conta
- Page 67 and 68: Results (SVN). Trac provides lightw
- Page 69: Results Figure 15: A model outlinin
- Page 73 and 74: Contributions and implications more
- Page 75 and 76: Contributions and implications inve
- Page 77 and 78: Contributions and implications appl
- Page 79: Contributions and implications the
- Page 82 and 83: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 84 and 85: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 86 and 87: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 88 and 89: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 90 and 91: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 92 and 93: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 94 and 95: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 96 and 97: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 98 and 99: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 100 and 101: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 102 and 103: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 104 and 105: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 106 and 107: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 108 and 109: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 110 and 111: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 112 and 113: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 114 and 115: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 116 and 117: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 118 and 119: of examples from the case illustrat
- Page 120 and 121:
the SE professional community, but
- Page 122 and 123:
programming) taught in other course
- Page 124 and 125:
In our project courses we currently
- Page 126 and 127:
The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 128 and 129:
communicating with the OSS communit
- Page 130 and 131:
member. Field notes were made durin
- Page 132 and 133:
occasions, Bernhard asked for more
- Page 134 and 135:
community, however, Ethan always co
- Page 136 and 137:
situations in real-life industry pr
- Page 138 and 139:
The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 140 and 141:
Figure 1. A SE student team at work
- Page 142 and 143:
for managing team-internal task coo
- Page 144 and 145:
Example 1. Excerpt from an IM log i
- Page 146 and 147:
In his formal evaluation of the pro
- Page 148 and 149:
considered whether current use of I
- Page 150 and 151:
Also, initial sharing of experience
- Page 152 and 153:
Krogstie, B. and B. Bygstad (2007).
- Page 154 and 155:
The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 156 and 157:
As course staff in SE project cours
- Page 158 and 159:
Following an interpretive approach
- Page 160 and 161:
Project logos and other visual mate
- Page 162 and 163:
contacts once made comments directl
- Page 164 and 165:
tool [15] may be seen as major enab
- Page 166 and 167:
Acknowledgements This work was fund
- Page 168 and 169:
The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 170 and 171:
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii Inte
- Page 172 and 173:
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii Inte
- Page 174 and 175:
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii Inte
- Page 176 and 177:
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii Inte
- Page 178 and 179:
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii Inte
- Page 180 and 181:
The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 182 and 183:
project trajectory and involves fac
- Page 184 and 185:
6 Questions about roles & lessons l
- Page 186 and 187:
member skilled in the technology. H
- Page 188 and 189:
Having the facilitator, and not the
- Page 190 and 191:
The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 192 and 193:
A Model of Retrospective Reflection
- Page 194 and 195:
A Model of Retrospective Reflection
- Page 196 and 197:
A Model of Retrospective Reflection
- Page 198 and 199:
A Model of Retrospective Reflection
- Page 200 and 201:
A Model of Retrospective Reflection
- Page 202 and 203:
A Model of Retrospective Reflection
- Page 204 and 205:
A Model of Retrospective Reflection
- Page 206 and 207:
The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 208 and 209:
The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 210 and 211:
to rethink the working process with
- Page 212 and 213:
was integrated with the code manage
- Page 214 and 215:
The Trac timeline (see Fig. 2, scre
- Page 216 and 217:
collection of rich data about each
- Page 218 and 219:
the entire team, is remembered by f
- Page 220 and 221:
some team members only. In Eric’s
- Page 222 and 223:
the modes of traversal, overview, a
- Page 224 and 225:
7 The Potential of Collaboration To
- Page 226 and 227:
a good start to consider what aspec
- Page 228 and 229:
30. Gutwin, C. and S. Greenberg, A
- Page 230:
The work-reflection-learning cycle