- Page 1 and 2:
Birgit Rognebakke Krogstie The work
- Page 3 and 4:
Figure 1: Most used terms in the th
- Page 5 and 6:
Abstract In project based learning,
- Page 7 and 8: Preface This thesis is submitted to
- Page 9 and 10: Acknowledgements I would like to th
- Page 11 and 12: Contents 1 Introduction ...........
- Page 13 and 14: Research paper P4 135 Research pape
- Page 15 and 16: Figure 17: Support for learning in
- Page 17: Abbreviations CSCL CSCW IS NITH NTN
- Page 20 and 21: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 22 and 23: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 24 and 25: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 26 and 27: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 28 and 29: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 30 and 31: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 32 and 33: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 34 and 35: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 37 and 38: 3 Software Engineering student proj
- Page 39 and 40: Software Engineering student projec
- Page 41 and 42: Software Engineering student projec
- Page 43 and 44: Software Engineering student projec
- Page 45: Software Engineering student projec
- Page 48 and 49: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 50 and 51: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 52 and 53: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 55 and 56: 5 Results This chapter presents an
- Page 57: Results The background of P2 is a l
- Page 61 and 62: Results proposed in P5 was to allow
- Page 63 and 64: Results Analysis of the results sho
- Page 65 and 66: Results archives are found to conta
- Page 67 and 68: Results (SVN). Trac provides lightw
- Page 69: Results Figure 15: A model outlinin
- Page 72 and 73: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 74 and 75: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 76 and 77: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 78 and 79: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 81 and 82: 7 Evaluation In this chapter, I eva
- Page 83 and 84: Evaluation adds to the CSCW literat
- Page 85 and 86: Evaluation 7.3 Evaluation of the re
- Page 87 and 88: Evaluation In the longitudinal stud
- Page 89 and 90: Evaluation According to the princip
- Page 91 and 92: Evaluation However, only some of th
- Page 93 and 94: Evaluation to design is problematic
- Page 95 and 96: 8 Conclusion and further work This
- Page 97 and 98: Conclusion and recommendations for
- Page 99 and 100: 9 References Abran, A., Moore, J. W
- Page 101 and 102: References Cobb, P. (1994). "Where
- Page 103 and 104: References Herbsleb, J. D., Mockus,
- Page 105 and 106: References Leont'ev, A. N. (1981).
- Page 107 and 108: References Stahl, G. (2002). "Build
- Page 109 and 110:
Glossary B Boundary object - artifa
- Page 111 and 112:
Glossary maintaining the system aft
- Page 113 and 114:
Appendix A: Research papers P1 P2 P
- Page 115 and 116:
Research paper P1 Title: Cross-Comm
- Page 117 and 118:
Cross-Community Collaboration and L
- Page 119 and 120:
the course staff may improve the co
- Page 121 and 122:
4: Case findings: students’ view
- Page 123 and 124:
own account of why each artifact is
- Page 125 and 126:
Research paper P2 Title: Power Thro
- Page 127 and 128:
Power Through Brokering: Open Sourc
- Page 129 and 130:
Due to the openness of OSS communit
- Page 131 and 132:
5.1.2 Second phase (February-May):
- Page 133 and 134:
Getting from the second to the thir
- Page 135 and 136:
6.2.1 Benefits for SE student proje
- Page 137 and 138:
Research paper P3 Title: Do’s and
- Page 139 and 140:
DO‟S AND DON‟TS OF INSTANT MESS
- Page 141 and 142:
a chat window is opened. As soon as
- Page 143 and 144:
three examples in the form of excer
- Page 145 and 146:
Example 2. Excerpt from an IM log s
- Page 147 and 148:
Example 3. Excerpt from an IM log s
- Page 149 and 150:
immediate feedback in the heated di
- Page 151 and 152:
Acknowledgements Thanks to Monica D
- Page 153 and 154:
Research paper P4 Title: The wiki a
- Page 155 and 156:
The wiki as an integrative tool in
- Page 157 and 158:
type of use can be seen as an examp
- Page 159 and 160:
ecome integration, and we identifie
- Page 161 and 162:
project. Typically, a clean-up was
- Page 163 and 164:
5.1 The wiki as a knowledge reposit
- Page 165 and 166:
6. Conclusion We have shown how pro
- Page 167 and 168:
Research paper P5 Title: Using Proj
- Page 169 and 170:
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii Inte
- Page 171 and 172:
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii Inte
- Page 173 and 174:
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii Inte
- Page 175 and 176:
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii Inte
- Page 177 and 178:
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii Inte
- Page 179 and 180:
Research paper P6 Title: Shared tim
- Page 181 and 182:
Shared timeline and individual expe
- Page 183 and 184:
presentation. In 2008, there were 1
- Page 185 and 186:
congruent’ to sets that seem to o
- Page 187 and 188:
team members and the co-constructiv
- Page 189 and 190:
Research paper P7 Title: A Model of
- Page 191 and 192:
A Model of Retrospective Reflection
- Page 193 and 194:
420 B.R. Krogstie Fig. 1. Shared ti
- Page 195 and 196:
422 B.R. Krogstie information about
- Page 197 and 198:
424 B.R. Krogstie and to express ho
- Page 199 and 200:
426 B.R. Krogstie 4.2 The Temporal
- Page 201 and 202:
428 B.R. Krogstie in combining them
- Page 203 and 204:
430 B.R. Krogstie Fig. 3. A model o
- Page 205 and 206:
432 B.R. Krogstie 20. Hutchins, E.:
- Page 207 and 208:
Research paper P8 Title: Supporting
- Page 209 and 210:
Supporting Reflection in Software D
- Page 211 and 212:
2 Background In this section we bri
- Page 213 and 214:
There are 3-5 students in the teams
- Page 215 and 216:
4 Research Method The research repo
- Page 217 and 218:
5 Findings In this section we draw
- Page 219 and 220:
As a consequence, ‘startup coding
- Page 221 and 222:
The type of data involved included
- Page 223 and 224:
potentially negative effects is if
- Page 225 and 226:
unfolded may shed light on the proc
- Page 227 and 228:
5. Lyytinen, K. and D. Robey, Learn
- Page 229 and 230:
Appendix B: Other research publicat