The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...
The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...
The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>work</strong>-<strong>reflection</strong>-<strong>learning</strong> <strong>cycle</strong> in SE student projects: Use <strong>of</strong> collaboration tools<br />
3.2 Use <strong>of</strong> lightweight collaboration tools in SE student<br />
projects<br />
In project based <strong>learning</strong>, tools are used to support <strong>learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>work</strong>. Technology<br />
introduced to support <strong>learning</strong>, what may be called <strong>learning</strong> technology, primarily has a<br />
role within the education logics <strong>of</strong> PBL. Learning technology includes tools for<br />
structuring <strong>learning</strong> activities (Xu 2007), having course staff communicate with,<br />
monitor <strong>and</strong> evaluate students (Coates et al. 2005; Trentin 2009) or in other ways<br />
support students‟ collaborative <strong>learning</strong> activities (e.g. building knowledge (Cress <strong>and</strong><br />
Kimmerle 2008), engaging in discussions (Zuhrieh 2009) <strong>and</strong> comparison with expert<br />
thinking (Lin et al. 1999)). <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware tools to support learners‟ construction <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge representations to aid collaborative <strong>learning</strong> was addressed in Suthers <strong>and</strong><br />
Hundhausen (2001). Among the lightweight tools wikis are cited as particularly good<br />
for collaborative knowledge construction <strong>and</strong> open, low-threshold participation<br />
(Hickerson <strong>and</strong> Giglio 2009; Kim <strong>and</strong> Lee 2002; Lund <strong>and</strong> Smørdal 2006).<br />
While acknowledging the relevance <strong>of</strong> <strong>learning</strong> technology for PBL, this thesis has a<br />
focus on tools primarily used to support <strong>work</strong>, e.g. participation in SE practice. It is the<br />
role <strong>and</strong> usage <strong>of</strong> a tool in a project that makes it a <strong>work</strong> tool: for instance a wiki may be<br />
introduced by a SE team as a tool for project management.<br />
An important part <strong>of</strong> effective project communication is to use appropriate technology<br />
to support it (Burnett 2001). This points to the need for students in PBL not only to gain<br />
experience with using collaboration technologies, for example in stakeholder<br />
communication, but to the need to learn to judge the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> the technology<br />
for the purpose.<br />
<strong>The</strong> focus in the thesis is on the use <strong>of</strong> lightweight collaboration tools. <strong>The</strong>se are tools<br />
that can be acquired <strong>and</strong> used at low cost (e.g. money <strong>and</strong> time to learn) for individuals<br />
<strong>and</strong> their organization. A lightweight collaboration tool typically provides a limited set<br />
<strong>of</strong> features to support one aspect <strong>of</strong> collaborative <strong>work</strong> <strong>and</strong> may thus be relatively easily<br />
integrated into existing <strong>work</strong> processes rather than imposing a certain process on the<br />
user. Many lightweight collaboration tools are associated with Web 2.0 (Dohn 2009),<br />
for example wikis, discussion forums, <strong>and</strong> instant messaging.<br />
Lightweight collaboration tools are actively used in <strong>work</strong> life. Tools used to support<br />
<strong>work</strong> practices include blogs, instant messaging, discussion forums <strong>and</strong> wikis (e.g.<br />
Isaacs et al. 2002a; Lovejoy <strong>and</strong> Grudin 2003; Majchrzak et al. 2006; Muller et al.<br />
2003; Nardi et al. 2000; Niinimaki 2008; Quan-Haase et al. 2005). In the area <strong>of</strong><br />
S<strong>of</strong>tware Engineering, textual chat <strong>and</strong> discussion forums have been found to be<br />
22