The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...
The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...
The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>work</strong>-<strong>reflection</strong>-<strong>learning</strong> <strong>cycle</strong> in SE student projects: Use <strong>of</strong> collaboration tools<br />
development methodology but is not necessarily strongly supported within the<br />
development methodology itself. In this thesis, the SE student projects <strong>of</strong> the case<br />
studies generally use iterative methodologies to structure their <strong>work</strong>.<br />
At this point there is a need for clarification about the use <strong>of</strong> the terms s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
development (SD) <strong>and</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware engineering (SE), for which definitions vary in the<br />
associated pr<strong>of</strong>essions <strong>and</strong> research fields. This thesis concentrates on the SD<br />
components <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware engineering <strong>work</strong>. In the research papers I use the term<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware engineering when I refer to <strong>and</strong> address the research fields <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essions <strong>of</strong><br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware engineering <strong>and</strong> SE education. In the publications for the CSCW <strong>and</strong> TEL<br />
communities, the focus is on s<strong>of</strong>tware development as a particular domain <strong>of</strong> <strong>work</strong>, <strong>and</strong><br />
I refer to s<strong>of</strong>tware development. In the thesis introduction, to be consistent I use only the<br />
term s<strong>of</strong>tware engineering.<br />
A second, major characteristic <strong>of</strong> SE student projects is that they are based on the<br />
pedagogical approach <strong>of</strong> project based <strong>learning</strong> (PBL). To be considered an instance <strong>of</strong><br />
PBL, a project must have the following characteristics (Thomas 2000):<br />
• be central, not peripheral to the curriculum<br />
• be focused on questions or problems that “drive” students to encounter (<strong>and</strong><br />
struggle with) the central concepts <strong>and</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> a discipline<br />
• involve students in a constructive investigation<br />
• be student-driven to some significant degree<br />
• be realistic, not like school <strong>work</strong><br />
PBL bears similarity to problem based <strong>learning</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the distinction between the two<br />
approaches is not necessarily clean in practice (Prince <strong>and</strong> Felder 2007). One main<br />
difference is that PBL, as opposed to problem based <strong>learning</strong>, involves the construction<br />
<strong>of</strong> concrete artifacts (Helle et al. 2006). Another difference is that PBL is based on<br />
students mainly applying knowledge that is previously acquired, with the final product<br />
as the primary focus. Problem based <strong>learning</strong> generally has a stronger focus on the<br />
solution process <strong>and</strong> no formal instruction to provide the necessary background for<br />
solving the problem (Prince <strong>and</strong> Felder 2007).<br />
As argued in Section 1.1, PBL resides at the intersection between education <strong>and</strong> <strong>work</strong>.<br />
This creates a tension between the associated educational <strong>and</strong> practice logics (Dohn<br />
2009). Educational practices are generally based on an acquisition metaphor <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>learning</strong>, in which the goals are external to participation: the learner, by participating in<br />
20