21.01.2014 Views

The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...

The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...

The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>work</strong>-<strong>reflection</strong>-<strong>learning</strong> <strong>cycle</strong> in SE student projects: Use <strong>of</strong> collaboration tools<br />

Knowledge-based <strong>learning</strong> communities “<strong>of</strong>ten share many <strong>of</strong> the features <strong>of</strong> a<br />

community <strong>of</strong> practice but focus on the deliberate <strong>and</strong> formal production <strong>of</strong><br />

external knowledge about the practice”. This includes being committed to<br />

recording <strong>and</strong> sharing knowledge “outside its immediate use or active context”<br />

(Riel <strong>and</strong> Polin 2004, p.21).<br />

In SE student projects <strong>and</strong> project based <strong>learning</strong> more generally, while knowledge<br />

building beyond the project itself may be important in some projects, the teams are<br />

typical task-based <strong>learning</strong> communities. This theoretical point is central to the<br />

perspective on the use <strong>of</strong> lightweight tools in research paper P4. At the same time in<br />

project based <strong>learning</strong>, participation in authentic <strong>work</strong> (e.g the CoP <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

community or possibly a particular organization) is a motivating force. Issues arising<br />

from SE project students simultaneously being members <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> <strong>learning</strong><br />

communities are discussed in P1.<br />

2.1.3 Distributed cognition<br />

From a constructionist perspective, <strong>learning</strong> in a SE student team can be viewed in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> knowledge construction. To underst<strong>and</strong> how knowledge is constructed (e.g. by<br />

the aid <strong>of</strong> technology) it is useful to go into more detail on the role <strong>of</strong> tools <strong>and</strong> how<br />

knowledge is distributed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> impact on activity (e.g. project <strong>work</strong>) <strong>of</strong> tools is captured in the idea <strong>of</strong> mediation:<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> tools forming the activity <strong>and</strong> the activity over time forming the design <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tools. This is a key point in various theoretical frame<strong>work</strong>s explaining the interplay <strong>of</strong><br />

the individual <strong>and</strong> the social (e.g. activity theory (Engeström 1987; Leont'ev 1981;<br />

Vygotsky 1978) <strong>and</strong> actor net<strong>work</strong> theory (Latour 2005)). Tools can be understood in a<br />

broad sense, comprising physical artifacts, theories <strong>and</strong> concepts as well as<br />

computerized tools. Within the frame<strong>work</strong> <strong>of</strong> distributed cognition (DCog) (Hutchins<br />

1995), the central unit <strong>of</strong> analysis is the functional system, “a collection <strong>of</strong> individuals<br />

<strong>and</strong> artifacts <strong>and</strong> their relations to each other in a particular <strong>work</strong> practice” (Rogers <strong>and</strong><br />

Ellis 1994). As in actor net<strong>work</strong> theory, the artifacts (e.g. tools) are considered entities<br />

analytically on a par with human actors, which helps shed light on the dynamics <strong>of</strong> tool<br />

mediation. Analyzing a case <strong>of</strong> collaborative <strong>work</strong> from the perspective <strong>of</strong> DCog, the<br />

main goal is to account for how the distributed structures are coordinated. This implies<br />

examining the contributions <strong>of</strong> the environment in which the <strong>work</strong> activity takes place,<br />

individuals‟ interactions <strong>and</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> artifacts in interaction, <strong>and</strong> the representational<br />

media used. DCog has a focus on the way knowledge is propagated across different<br />

representational states along various communicative pathways (Rogers <strong>and</strong> Ellis 1994).<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!