21.01.2014 Views

The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...

The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...

The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DO‟S AND DON‟TS OF INSTANT MESSAGING IN STUDENTS‟<br />

PROJECT WORK<br />

Birgit Krogstie, IDI, NTNU, birgitkr@idi.ntnu.no<br />

Abstract<br />

Instant messaging is a type <strong>of</strong> lightweight collaboration technology heavily used among students in<br />

higher education for social interaction <strong>and</strong> for school <strong>work</strong>. This paper sheds light on students’ use <strong>of</strong><br />

instant messaging to support collaboration in s<strong>of</strong>tware engineering student projects. We draw on several<br />

years’ <strong>of</strong> research on the use <strong>of</strong> collaboration technology in such projects <strong>and</strong> present illustrative<br />

examples <strong>of</strong> how instant messaging is used within the teams <strong>and</strong> for communication with other<br />

stakeholders, e.g. project supervisor <strong>and</strong> customer. We find that the use <strong>of</strong> instant messaging in the<br />

projects is generally successful, but in some cases it is inadequate, which may severely harm the project<br />

outcome. Based on our findings, we discuss implications for the organization <strong>and</strong> supervision <strong>of</strong> SE<br />

student projects.<br />

Keywords: instant messaging, synchronous chat, student projects, s<strong>of</strong>tware engineering student projects.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

“But in the case I have a technical question, <strong>and</strong> want to ask somebody in the group, I<br />

first look at MSN.” (Member <strong>of</strong> a student s<strong>of</strong>tware engineering project team)<br />

Observing s<strong>of</strong>tware engineering (SE) students in a project meeting or in the computer lab, you might<br />

notice chat windows frequently popping up on the laptop <strong>and</strong> terminal screens. Different actions are taken<br />

by the students in response to the pop-ups. Some windows are ignored (at least for the present), some are<br />

discreetly attended to with a brief textual exchange, <strong>and</strong> some (if the ongoing activity in the room allows<br />

it) appear to call for the immediate attention <strong>of</strong> the neighbour or all the students in the room. Some<br />

messages appear to be project or otherwise school related, others belong to the private sphere in which a<br />

social net<strong>work</strong> appears to be incessantly maintained mainly through this channel.<br />

What is going on, is instant messaging. Instant messaging tools are easily available, lightweight<br />

collaboration tools that provide the user with the opportunity to communicate with one or more contacts<br />

through textual chat. This channel <strong>of</strong> communication is constantly open <strong>and</strong> present in the students‟ <strong>work</strong><br />

environment; mostly in the background <strong>and</strong> sometimes in the foreground. From the viewpoint <strong>of</strong> course<br />

staff in a project course, it is highly interesting to know whether, <strong>and</strong> in what way, the use <strong>of</strong> instant<br />

messaging is supporting, or perhaps getting in the way <strong>of</strong>, the intended <strong>learning</strong>.<br />

SE student projects is a case <strong>of</strong> project-based <strong>learning</strong> (Blumenfeld, Soloway et al. 1991). This<br />

pedagogical approach is based on student projects that are central to the curriculum, focused on questions<br />

or problems that “drive” students to encounter the central concepts <strong>and</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> a discipline,<br />

involving students in a constructive investigation, student-driven to a significant degree, <strong>and</strong> realistic, not<br />

school-like (Thomas 2000). Through SE student projects, students are being exposed to challenges <strong>of</strong> SE<br />

<strong>work</strong> while receiving necessary guidance <strong>and</strong> support (Bygstad, Krogstie et al. 2006; Bygstad, Krogstie et<br />

al. 2009). Figure 1 shows a SE student team in various settings <strong>of</strong> everyday <strong>work</strong>.<br />

121<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!