The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...
The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ... The work-reflection-learning cycle - Department of Computer and ...
In our project courses we currently see the successful use of various shared workspace tools: wikis, forums, simple file hierarchies, and more comprehensive tools (e.g. Sharepoint), used for within-team purposes and for sharing contents and interacting with other stakeholders. We suggest that this infrastructure be utilized in efforts to provide effective representations of, access to, boundary objects. In future and ongoing work, we investigate more closely the potential of particular collaboration tools to support the development of boundary objects in customer-driven SD projects. 7. Acknowledgements [13] We wish to thank Glenn Munkvold for useful discussion related to this paper. 8. References [1] P. C. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palinscar, "Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning," Educational Psychologist, vol. 26, pp. 369-398, 1991. [2] L. Helle, P. Tynjälä, and E. Olkinuora, "Project-based learning in post-secondary education - theory, practice and rubber sling shots," Higher Education, vol. 51, pp. 287-314, 2006. [3] J. S. Brown, A. Collins, and P. Duguid, "Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning," Educational Researcher, vol. 18, pp. 32-42, 1989. [4] P. J. A. van Vliet and L. R. Pietron, "Information Systems Development Education in the Real World - A Project Methodology and Assessment," Journal of Information Systems Education, vol. 17, pp. 285- 293, 2006. [5] B. Fitzgerald, "The use of systems development methodologies in practice: a field study," Information Systems Journal, vol. 7, pp. 201-212, 1997. [6] J.-H. Ahn and A. E. Skudlark, "Resolving conflict of interest in the process of an information system implementation for advanced telecommunication services," Journal of Information Technology, vol. 12, pp. 3-13, 1997. [7] A. Pouloudi, "Aspects of the Stakeholder Concept and their Implications for Information Systems Development," presented at 32nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, 1999. [8] M. Riel and L. Polin, "Online Learning Communities. Common Ground and Critical Differences in Designing Technical Environments," in Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, S. A. K. Barab, Rob; Gray, James H., Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 16-50. [9] E. Wenger, Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning, and Identity: Cambridge University Press, 1998. [10] U. Gal, Y. Youngjin, and R. Boland, "The dynamics of boundary objects, social infrastructures and social identities," 2005. [11] H. Karsten, K. Lyytinen, M. Hurskainen, and T. Koskelainen, "Crossing boundaries and conscripting participation: representing and integrating knowledge in a paper machinery project," European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 10, pp. 89-98, 2001. [12] S. L. Star, "The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving," in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, M. Huhns and L. Gasser, Eds.: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1990, pp. 37-54. H. In, B. Boehm, T. Rodgers, and M. Deutsch, "Applying WinWin to quality requirements: a case study," presented at ICSE'01, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2001. [14] T. Erickson and W. A. Kellogg, "Social Translucence: An Approach to Designing Systems that Support Social Processes," ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, pp. 59-83, 2000. [15] J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press., 1991. [16] A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy," in Encyclopedia of human behaviour, vol. 4, V. S. Ramachaudran, Ed. New York, USA: Academic Press, 1994, pp. 71-81. [17] A. Langley, "Strategies for theorizing from process data," Academy of Management Review, vol. 24, pp. 691-710, 1999. 20th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET'07) 0-7695-2893-7/07 $20.00 © 2007 Authorized licensed use limited to: Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet. Downloaded on February 5, 2010 at 08:55 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. 106
Research paper P2 Title: Power Through Brokering: Open Source Community Participation in Software Engineering Student Proejcts Authors: Birgit Krogstie Published in: Proceedings of ICSE 2008 Pages: 10 Complete reference: Krogstie, B. (2008). Power through brokering. OSS participation in SE projects. International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) 2008, Leipzig, Germany, 10-18 May. IEEE Computer Society. 107
- Page 74 and 75: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 76 and 77: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 78 and 79: The work-reflection-learning cycle
- Page 81 and 82: 7 Evaluation In this chapter, I eva
- Page 83 and 84: Evaluation adds to the CSCW literat
- Page 85 and 86: Evaluation 7.3 Evaluation of the re
- Page 87 and 88: Evaluation In the longitudinal stud
- Page 89 and 90: Evaluation According to the princip
- Page 91 and 92: Evaluation However, only some of th
- Page 93 and 94: Evaluation to design is problematic
- Page 95 and 96: 8 Conclusion and further work This
- Page 97 and 98: Conclusion and recommendations for
- Page 99 and 100: 9 References Abran, A., Moore, J. W
- Page 101 and 102: References Cobb, P. (1994). "Where
- Page 103 and 104: References Herbsleb, J. D., Mockus,
- Page 105 and 106: References Leont'ev, A. N. (1981).
- Page 107 and 108: References Stahl, G. (2002). "Build
- Page 109 and 110: Glossary B Boundary object - artifa
- Page 111 and 112: Glossary maintaining the system aft
- Page 113 and 114: Appendix A: Research papers P1 P2 P
- Page 115 and 116: Research paper P1 Title: Cross-Comm
- Page 117 and 118: Cross-Community Collaboration and L
- Page 119 and 120: the course staff may improve the co
- Page 121 and 122: 4: Case findings: students’ view
- Page 123: own account of why each artifact is
- Page 127 and 128: Power Through Brokering: Open Sourc
- Page 129 and 130: Due to the openness of OSS communit
- Page 131 and 132: 5.1.2 Second phase (February-May):
- Page 133 and 134: Getting from the second to the thir
- Page 135 and 136: 6.2.1 Benefits for SE student proje
- Page 137 and 138: Research paper P3 Title: Do’s and
- Page 139 and 140: DO‟S AND DON‟TS OF INSTANT MESS
- Page 141 and 142: a chat window is opened. As soon as
- Page 143 and 144: three examples in the form of excer
- Page 145 and 146: Example 2. Excerpt from an IM log s
- Page 147 and 148: Example 3. Excerpt from an IM log s
- Page 149 and 150: immediate feedback in the heated di
- Page 151 and 152: Acknowledgements Thanks to Monica D
- Page 153 and 154: Research paper P4 Title: The wiki a
- Page 155 and 156: The wiki as an integrative tool in
- Page 157 and 158: type of use can be seen as an examp
- Page 159 and 160: ecome integration, and we identifie
- Page 161 and 162: project. Typically, a clean-up was
- Page 163 and 164: 5.1 The wiki as a knowledge reposit
- Page 165 and 166: 6. Conclusion We have shown how pro
- Page 167 and 168: Research paper P5 Title: Using Proj
- Page 169 and 170: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii Inte
- Page 171 and 172: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii Inte
- Page 173 and 174: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii Inte
Research paper P2<br />
Title:<br />
Power Through Brokering: Open Source Community Participation in S<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
Engineering Student Proejcts<br />
Authors:<br />
Birgit Krogstie<br />
Published in:<br />
Proceedings <strong>of</strong> ICSE 2008<br />
Pages:<br />
10<br />
Complete reference:<br />
Krogstie, B. (2008). Power through brokering. OSS participation in SE projects.<br />
International Conference on S<strong>of</strong>tware Engineering (ICSE) 2008, Leipzig, Germany,<br />
10-18 May. IEEE <strong>Computer</strong> Society.<br />
107
Change language