21.01.2014 Views

REP13/FH JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ...

REP13/FH JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ...

REP13/FH JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>REP13</strong>/<strong>FH</strong> 10<br />

PROPOSED DRAFT ANNEX ON BERRIES TO THE CODE OF HYGIENIC PRACTICE FOR FRESH<br />

FRUITS AND VEGETABLES (CAC/RCP 53-2003) (Agenda Item 7) 11<br />

86. The Committee recalled that the 43 rd Session agreed to request the 35 th Session of the Commission to<br />

approve new work on the development of an Annex on berries to the Code of Hygienic Practice for Fresh<br />

Fruits and Vegetables (CAC/RCP 53-2003) and to establish an electronic working group, led by Brazil, to<br />

develop the proposed draft Annex for comments at Step 3 and consideration by the present Session.<br />

87. The Delegation of Brazil introduced the report of the electronic working group (CX/<strong>FH</strong> 12/44/9) and<br />

highlighted the approach taken in the development of the Annex. He pointed out that special attention<br />

should be given to the scope and the definition of berries and recommended that the entire Code and all its<br />

annexes be reviewed to ensure consistency and remove duplication (Agenda Item 8). Therefore, he<br />

recommended that the Committee should not pay too much attention to the consistency and duplication with<br />

the main text and/or other annexes at this time.<br />

88. The Committee considered the proposed draft Annex section by section and, in addition to editorial<br />

corrections, made the following comments and amendments.<br />

Introduction<br />

89. In the third paragraph, “manipulation” was replaced by “handling” as more correct.<br />

Scope<br />

90. The Committee agreed to limit the scope to all varieties of edible strawberries, raspberries,<br />

blackberries, mulberries, blueberries, currants and gooseberries and groundcherries that would be indicated<br />

also by their scientific name to avoid confusion, as common names differed from country to country. In view<br />

of this decision, it was agreed that there was no need for a definition for berries in section 2.3.<br />

91. The Committee further agreed to clarify that in the case of wild berries, only the measures for handling<br />

and post-harvest activities apply.<br />

3.1.1 Location of the production site<br />

92. The second paragraph was amended to clarify cleaning and disinfection steps and to state that berries<br />

that have come into contact with flood waters should not be used because of the high risk of contamination.<br />

93. The Committee agreed to amend the third paragraph to allow flexibility for a drying period before<br />

harvesting.<br />

3.1.2 Wild and domestic animals and human activity<br />

94. The Committee agreed to refer to wild and domestic animals and not to list specific examples.<br />

95. In the first bullet point, it was agreed to replace “cultural” by “cultivation” as this was a more<br />

understandable and common term”, and to refer only to environmental protection regulations, as this would<br />

encompass both animal and plant.<br />

3.2 Hygienic primary production of berries<br />

96. The section was amended by the addition of examples to clarify those production practices that could<br />

minimize contact with airborne contaminants.<br />

97. The last paragraph was amended to provide examples of biodegradable materials used during<br />

growing and harvesting by small farmers.<br />

3.2.1.1 Water for primary production<br />

98. The Committee agreed to delete the second bullet point and to insert guidance on selection of<br />

indicators as the selection of indicators should be fit for purpose and not limited to E. coli testing.<br />

3.2.1.2 Manure, biosolids and other natural fertilizers<br />

99. The Committee did not agree to a proposal to delete “to the extent possible” in the first sentence as<br />

this would prevent the use of manure (untreated and liquid). It was noted that manure was used, in particular<br />

for organic agriculture, and that general guidance on the use of manure was provided in the main Code<br />

(section 3.2.1.2).<br />

11<br />

CX/<strong>FH</strong> 12/44/9; comments of Costa Rica, Cuba, Egypt, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico and USA (CX/<strong>FH</strong> 12/44/9-Add.1);<br />

Argentina, Philippines, Senegal and IACFO (CX/<strong>FH</strong> 12/44/9-Add.2); Thailand (CRD 4); India (CRD 5); EU (CRD 15);<br />

Brazil (CRD 18).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!