21.01.2014 Views

The Role of State Constitutions in Protecting ... - International IDEA

The Role of State Constitutions in Protecting ... - International IDEA

The Role of State Constitutions in Protecting ... - International IDEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Indigenous people<br />

<strong>The</strong> Australian federal system has worked reasonably well to protect small <strong>State</strong><br />

communities from the larger <strong>State</strong>s, while still enjoy<strong>in</strong>g the advantages <strong>of</strong> union.<br />

All Australian <strong>Constitutions</strong>, however, both Commonwealth and <strong>State</strong>, were writtten<br />

for a monocultural society. At the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the 20th century, the<br />

Australians saw no need for their <strong>Constitutions</strong> to accommodate cultural diversity.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is no protection <strong>of</strong> rights <strong>in</strong> either the Commonwealth or <strong>State</strong><br />

<strong>Constitutions</strong>, although the former precludes the establishment <strong>of</strong> any religion.<br />

One hundred years later, largely as a result <strong>of</strong> immigration, the Australian<br />

population is very diverse. Moreover, although there have been no relevant<br />

changes to the Commonwealth Constitution, the system has adapted to these<br />

new circumstances reasonably well, although without seriously challeng<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ant culture. New, multicultural policies have been adopted, through the<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ary political processes, at both Commonwealth and <strong>State</strong> levels. Antidiscrim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

legislation has been <strong>in</strong>troduced and works quite effectively. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

is relatively little <strong>in</strong>tercultural conflict. Whatever their backgrounds, all<br />

Australians are free, with<strong>in</strong> the private sphere, to pursue their own religion, to<br />

speak their own language and with<strong>in</strong> limits, to follow their own culture.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Australian constitutional system has worked much less well for <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

Australians, however. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>digenous people are a small m<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Australian population; <strong>in</strong> 2002 approximately 2 %. <strong>The</strong>y live <strong>in</strong> all <strong>State</strong>s,<br />

although with a larger concentration <strong>in</strong> the north, dilut<strong>in</strong>g their <strong>in</strong>fluence further<br />

still. <strong>The</strong>ir culture is unfamiliar. <strong>The</strong>y occupied the whole territory, at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

European settlement and <strong>in</strong> that sense represented a threat. Partly as a<br />

consequence, there is a direct conflict between their <strong>in</strong>terests and those <strong>of</strong> the<br />

majority community.<br />

At the time <strong>of</strong> European settlement, from 1788, Australia was deemed to be “terra<br />

nullius”. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>digenous legal system was ignored and, with it, <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

<strong>in</strong>terests <strong>in</strong> land. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>digenous people were dispossessed by the settlers and<br />

pushed north and west. More than one hundred years later, at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

federation <strong>in</strong> 1901, the <strong>in</strong>digenous people were expressly excluded from<br />

Commonwealth power. <strong>The</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>terests and welfare thus rema<strong>in</strong>ed entirely with<br />

the <strong>State</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Constitutions</strong> conta<strong>in</strong>ed little, if anyth<strong>in</strong>g, to protect them.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was no special provision for <strong>in</strong>digenous representation; <strong>in</strong>deed, they were<br />

not fully <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the franchise until the 1960s.<br />

As a result, throughout most <strong>of</strong> the 20th century, the <strong>in</strong>digenous people <strong>of</strong><br />

Australia were treated very badly. Until relatively recently there was no<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> their law and little <strong>of</strong> their culture. Many groups lost their<br />

languages. Except <strong>in</strong> the far north, they were generally without land. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

suffered extreme social and economic disadvantage. <strong>The</strong>y were politically<br />

powerless to remedy their own situation.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!