20.01.2014 Views

draft manuscript - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

draft manuscript - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

draft manuscript - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3.6.2 Conjunction with Comitative =mukui<br />

The comitative postposition =mukui may adjoin to the last <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> conjoined NPs, much like<br />

weRanu, as in (2.49).<br />

(2.49) 1watimai Ritama, aikiaRa tuyuka Ritama, upakatu maRainkanamukui, yaw1k1taRa, wakutataRa,<br />

yeneyaRasemai weRanu, muRiai Dios muRa.<br />

1wati =mai Ritama aikiaRa tuyuka Ritama upa =katu maRain<br />

be.high.up =inact.nomz village dem.prox.ms land village all =intsf thing<br />

=kana =mukui yaw1k1 -taRa wakuta -taRa yene= yaRa =semai<br />

=pl.ms =com make -act.nomz carry.in.arm -act.nomz 1pl.incl= master =verid<br />

weRanu muRia -i Dios muRa<br />

coord thus -? God 3sg.ms<br />

‘The Creator <strong>of</strong> Heaven, Earth and all things, the protector, and our true Lord as well, thus<br />

is God.’<br />

(example (5.2b))<br />

This strategy is only attested once in Old Omagua, with weRanu fulfilling the same function much<br />

more frequently. Recall that weRanu has fallen out <strong>of</strong> the modern language entirely. Synchronically,<br />

nominal coordination is most typically achieved via unmarked juxtaposition.<br />

2.3.6.3 Similative =ya<br />

Similarity between nominal referents is indicated via the nominal enclitic =ya, which appears following<br />

the plural marker =kana in (2.50).<br />

(2.50) Roaya miaRakanayakatu yenesuumukui Ranaumanu.<br />

Roaya<br />

neg<br />

miaRa =kana =ya =katu yene= suu =mukui Rana= umanu<br />

monkey =pl.ms =sim =intsf 1pl.incl= body =com 3pl.ms= die<br />

‘They [our souls] do not die with our bodies like animals.’<br />

(example (6.22b))<br />

a- kaRu -potat a- ke -potat =Ran<br />

1sg.erg-<br />

eat -desid 1sg.erg sleep -desid =coord<br />

‘I want to eat and sleep.’<br />

(Seki 2000:239)<br />

Both =we and =Ran co-occur in cases wherein one <strong>of</strong> a subset <strong>of</strong> conjoined NPs is realized post-verbally (i.e., in<br />

non-canonical position), an apparent focus strategy, as in (2.3). Note, however, that the function <strong>of</strong> weRanu in<br />

Old Omagua is not restricted to this limited syntactic environment, and in conjoining both NPs and VPs exhibits<br />

hybrid syntactic characteristics <strong>of</strong> both Kamaiurá =we and =Ran.<br />

(2.3) ojomonopawawa Rak moReRekwaRaweRan.<br />

o- jo-<br />

mono -paw =awa Rak moReRekwat -a =we =Ran<br />

3.ergrecip-<br />

send -cpl =pl ? chief -ref =coord =coord<br />

‘They all went, and the chief too.’<br />

(Seki 2000:248)<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!