20.01.2014 Views

draft manuscript - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

draft manuscript - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

draft manuscript - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(O’Hagan and Wauters 2012), i.e., with an additional final syllable present, stress would have been<br />

assigned in an expected right-aligned trochaic pattern, yielding penultimate stress. 42<br />

The grammaticalization trajectory described above is problematic in that it entails that Old<br />

Kokama-Kokamilla =aRi grammaticalized as a future, retaining its distribution as a VP-final enclitic,<br />

but further grammaticalized to become a verbal affix encoding progressive aspect, as it did in<br />

Omagua (see above). However, two points <strong>of</strong> evidence suggest that this is indeed the origin <strong>of</strong><br />

Kokama-Kokamilla =á. On the one hand, Espinosa Pérez (1935:47) lists a form as an<br />

alternant to the additional Kokama-Kokamilla future =utsu, which presumably corresponds to the<br />

=á documented by Vallejos Yopán. Furthermore, modern Omagua future =(u)saRi grammaticalized<br />

from =usu=aRi (see (2.13)), which suggests that the grammaticalization <strong>of</strong> Proto-Omagua-Kokama<br />

*=aRi into a future is a recent occurrence in both languages (see footnote (41)), perhaps occurring<br />

under mutual influence between speakers <strong>of</strong> the two languages, though involving different forms. 43<br />

2.2.3.1.3 upa ‘come to an end, run out’ The verb upa is a minor verb (in the sense <strong>of</strong><br />

Aikhenvald (2006)) in a serial verb construction 44 that encodes the exhaustion <strong>of</strong> the event denoted<br />

by the predicate, as in (2.15). We discuss it here because <strong>of</strong> the aspectual reading it imparts on the<br />

construction in which it participates. It is homophonous with the universal quantifier.<br />

(2.15) yeneikuasenuni Diossemai se, yenesaSitasenuni muRa Dios, RakumesamaipuRakana yeneamuyasukatasenuni,<br />

aikiaRa tuyukaaRi yeneyuRitiupaRaSi, 1watimai Ritamakate yeneususenuni.<br />

yene= ikua =senuni Dios =semai se yene= saSita =senuni muRa Dios<br />

1pl.incl= know =purp God =verid ? 1pl.incl= love =purp 3sg.ms God<br />

Ra= kumesa =mai =puRa =kana yene= amuyasukata =senuni<br />

3sg.ms= say =inact.nomz =nom.pst =pl.ms 1pl.incl= observe =purp<br />

aikiaRa tuyuka =aRi yene= yuRiti =upa =RaSi 1wati<br />

dem.prox.ms land =loc.diff 1pl.incl= be.in.place =cess =nass be.high.up<br />

=mai Ritama =kate yene= usu =senuni<br />

=inact.nomz village =all 1pl.incl= go =purp<br />

‘So that we may truly know God, so that we may love him, so that we may observe his<br />

commandments, and ceasing to remain on Earth, so that we may go to Heaven.’<br />

(example (6.8b))<br />

Although a thorough discussion <strong>of</strong> serial verbs in modern Omagua is outside the scope <strong>of</strong> this<br />

chapter, the class <strong>of</strong> minor verbs in the modern language includes the verbs <strong>of</strong> motion usu ‘go’, uRi<br />

‘come’ and ukua ‘go about’, as well as the posture verb yuRiti ‘be in a place’. The use <strong>of</strong> usu in a<br />

serial verb construction is attested in Old Omagua (see §2.2.3.1.1). 45<br />

42 It is possible (at least for a subset <strong>of</strong> these morphemes) that what appears to be a diachronic process <strong>of</strong> final<br />

CV truncation in many grammatical morphemes in Kokama-Kokamilla, as described above, is rather a synchronic<br />

process whereby certain final CVs are truncated only when the morphemes in which they occur appear stem-finally,<br />

but are retained when additional clitics follow (see the alternations in the instrumental postposition =pu(pe) in<br />

Vallejos Yopán (2010a:280-286)).<br />

43 In the later missionization period, Kokama and Omagua lived on some <strong>of</strong> the same mission settlements. This is<br />

reported for San Joaquín de Omaguas from the mid-18th century (Uriarte [1776]1986); Sarayacu (Ucayali river),<br />

a Franciscan site, in the early 19th century (Lehnertz 1974:271); and Lagunas (Huallaga river), the head <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Jesuit missions until 1768 (Yuyarima Tapuchima, p.c.). Trade patterns existed between residents <strong>of</strong> San Joaquín<br />

de Omaguas and groups <strong>of</strong> the upper Ucayali as late as 1828 (Maw 1829:185), although it is unknown whether the<br />

latter were Sarayacu residents. These facts make the possibility for contact-induced changes quite likely.<br />

44 See footnote 32.<br />

45 See Michael et al. (in prep) for a more detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> modern Omagua serial verbs.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!