draft manuscript - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

More documents

Recommendations

Info

clitic =tipa, whereas the corresponding interrogative word in the Full Catechism, (9.37), does not. The wh-word maniamai is attested in modern Omagua (albeit with a meaning of ‘what type of’), where it cannot be marked by =pa, the interrogative clitic in modern Omagua. The questions also differ in their the treatment of the object of uwaka ‘transform’, awa ‘man’, with the Full Catechism object bearing the nominal purposive clitic =Ra, as we expect based on modern Omagua, but the corresponding element in the Catechism Fragment laking this clitic, rendering the construction ungrammatical. The responses show the same difference in appropriate use of the nominal purposive. Other than the difference in the use of the nominal purposive, the responses also differ in the Fragment marking ta1Ra ‘son’ with the veridical =semai verid to maintain the fact that it is God’s true son who transformed into a man. (9.36) a. aikiaRa musap1R1ka personakanasui, maniamaitipa awa uwaka 1m1nua? aikiaRa dem.prox.ms 1m1nua long.ago musap1R1ka three persona person ‘Of these three people, which became man? b. Dios ta1Rasemai awa uwaka 1m1nua. Dios ta1Ra =semai awa uwaka 1m1nua God son.male.ego =verid man transform long.ago ‘The son of God truly became man. (see (5.11)) =kana =sui maniamai =tipa awa uwaka =pl.ms =abl which =interr man transform (9.37) a. aikiaRa musap1R1ka personakanasui, maniamai awaRa uwaka 1m1nua? aikiaRa musap1R1ka dem.prox.ms three uwaka 1m1nua transform long.ago persona person ‘Of these three people, which became man? b. Dios ta1Ra awaRa uwaka 1m1nua. =kana =sui maniamai awa =Ra =pl.ms =abl which man =nom.purp Dios ta1Ra awa =Ra uwaka 1m1nua God son.male.ego man =nom.purp transform long.ago ‘The son of God became man.’ (see (6.11)) 12th Question-Response Pair The same difference in the use of maRaikua and maniasenuni, discussed above in the questions of (9.32) and (9.33) is found in (5.12) and (6.12). In the responses, the Fragment shows an additional clause describing Christ’s taking Christians to Heaven that is absent in the Full Catechism, although the latter states that Christ will save Christians both from their evils and from Hell, whereas the former does not mention Hell (see footnote 188). Interim Summary In Table 9.2 we summarize the major findings laid out at the beginning of this section with regard to the grammatical characteristics of each of the two catechistic texts. A check mark indicates grammatical uses of the construction in question, while an ‘X’ indicates ungrammatical uses. 151
Table 9.2: Summary of Grammatical Differences Between Catechistic Texts calqued =mukui weranu ungram. gram. prenom. ungram. ungram. oblique cx. coord coord interrog mod. order reason cl. nom. pred. frag, Q&R 1 X full, Q&R 1 ∅ frag, Q&R 2 ̌ ̌ full, Q&R 2 ∅ ∅ frag, Q&R 3 X ∅ full, Q&R 3 ∅ X frag, Q&R 4 ̌ X full, Q&R 4 ∅ ∅ frag, Q&R 5 X full, Q&R 5 ∅ frag, Q&R 7 ̌ X full, Q&R 7 X ∅ frag, Q&R 8 X full, Q&R 8 ∅ frag, Q&R 10 ̌ ̌, ̌ full, Q&R 10 ̌ X, ̌ frag, Q&R 11 X full, Q&R 11 ∅ frag, Q&R 12 X full, Q&R 12 ∅ 152
Page 1 and 2:
A Linguistic Analysis of Old Omagua
Page 3 and 4:
2.3.2 Nominal Modification . . . .
Page 5 and 6:
List of Tables 1 Morphemes and Abbr
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgments Our greatest thanks
Page 9 and 10:
fut Future tense =usu =usaRi goal G
Page 11 and 12:
=Ra nom.purp Nominal purposive nom.
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 2: Early Locations of the Om
Page 15 and 16:
of Faith. The texts were produced b
Page 17 and 18:
summarizing its publication history
Page 19 and 20:
2.1 Phonological Inventory Old Omag
Page 21 and 22:
pronouns: free pronouns are shown t
Page 23 and 24:
These phonological processes have g
Page 25 and 26:
patiRi =k1Ra usu priest =dim go ‘
Page 27 and 28:
2.2.3 Verbal Morphology In this sec
Page 29 and 30:
have presumably wanted to overtly e
Page 31 and 32:
(O’Hagan and Wauters 2012), i.e.,
Page 33 and 34:
is attested in modern Omagua, altho
Page 35 and 36:
ta= yapiSika -ta InI iSipu =pupI na
Page 37 and 38:
2.2.3.2.3 Clausal Nominalizers Old
Page 39 and 40:
2.2.3.2.4 Subject Nominalizer -suRi
Page 41 and 42:
Table 2.12: Modern Omagua Verbs Nom
Page 43 and 44:
2.3.1 Basic Clause Structure Omagua
Page 45 and 46:
Table 2.16: Order of Modern Omagua
Page 47 and 48:
(2.39) ene yumiaw1RaRaSi ta, Roaya
Page 49 and 50:
aikiaRa musap1R1ka persona =kana Ro
Page 51 and 52:
marked by the purposive =senuni (se
Page 53 and 54:
This morpheme has fallen out of the
Page 55 and 56:
‘It is Jesus Christ, the Son of G
Page 57 and 58:
e.g., if, when, since, etc. - given
Page 59 and 60:
‘You rest while we go work.’ Mo
Page 61 and 62:
yene= =ikua Ra= susana =RaSi cruz =
Page 63 and 64:
awa =kai =suaRa =puRa man =? =advbl
Page 65 and 66:
2.3.9 Non-Verbal Predication Non-ve
Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 3 Text Conventions This cha
Page 69 and 70:
given for a very similar Quechua ca
Page 71 and 72:
central vowel /1/. The high central
Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 4 Lord’s Prayer 4.1 Bibli
Page 75 and 76:
text is unclear, although it should
Page 77 and 78:
(4.2) a. Ene nuamai ritama teneruri
Page 79 and 80:
ename 139 ne= iSaRi tanu 140 ukukui
Page 81 and 82:
The Jesuit missionary mentioned in
Page 83 and 84:
(5.2) a. i. Maraitipa Dios mura? ii
Page 85 and 86:
(5.5) a. i. Aguerepa Dios amiti? ii
Page 87 and 88:
. i. Dios semai raicua zenoni, mura
Page 89 and 90:
ii. Dios Taegrasemai, Ahua guaca em
Page 91 and 92:
La copia del original me fue entreg
Page 93 and 94:
(6.3) a. i. Mara e pupe Dios yahueq
Page 95 and 96:
(6.7) a. i. Marae rapa Dios yahuequ
Page 97 and 98:
(6.10) a. i. Ayquiara musa puereca
Page 99 and 100:
ii. Virgen Santa Maria ceuecacuarap
Page 101 and 102:
iii. yeneikua RasusanaRaSi, cruzaRi
Page 103 and 104:
(6.20) a. i. Era Xtiano cana Dios c
Page 105 and 106:
ii. Roaya, miaracanayacatu yennezum
Page 107 and 108:
(6.26) a. i. Mura quarasschi pupe m
Page 109 and 110:
(6.28) a. i. Mare tipa Ahuacana y a
Page 111 and 112:
target: ‘Grieving with all their
Page 113 and 114: iii. m1t1R1pe 1p1sasui comulgayaRay
Page 115 and 116: muRia -i ta= saRa ta= ĩya =mukui =
Page 117 and 118: Chapter 7 Profession of Faith Below
Page 119 and 120: c. upai tautSakana eRa taconfesayaR
Page 121 and 122: When Uriarte and his Jesuit compani
Page 123 and 124: Uriarte’s own, and as such we do
Page 125 and 126: (Uriarte [1776]1986:ibid.) goes on
Page 127 and 128: wiSani =puRa tenepeta 290 muRa be.d
Page 129 and 130: eRaya usu yene= patiRi =kana well g
Page 131 and 132: 9.1 Jesuit Interactions with the Om
Page 133 and 134: Ecuador), 314 were sent to found a
Page 135 and 136: of Kambeba lived as far downriver a
Page 137 and 138: empeño para (sic) entroducir en la
Page 139 and 140: There is ample evidence that Quechu
Page 141 and 142: Chantre y Herrera (1901:93) similar
Page 143 and 144: El P. Ignacio María Franciscis fue
Page 145 and 146: versions of ecclesiastical texts in
Page 147 and 148: 9.3 Jesuit Language Use in Old Omag
Page 149 and 150: (9.8) wakutatara wakuta -tara carry
Page 151 and 152: espíritu santo =sui muRa virgen sa
Page 153 and 154: the former Spanish sense was the on
Page 155 and 156: A passive-like effect is achieved b
Page 157 and 158: maRai =tipa Dios what =interr God
Page 159 and 160: ‘Where is God?’ b. 1watimai Rit
Page 161 and 162: maRai =ikua =tipa Dios yaw1k1 upa =
Page 163: aikiaRa musap1R1ka persona =kana uy
Page 167 and 168: ely on translation from a Quechua m
Page 169 and 170: Jesuits succeeded in bringing a sig
Page 171 and 172: conclusion to be drawn from the his
Page 173 and 174: Cabral, Ana Suelly Arruda Camara an
Page 175 and 176: Edmundson, George. 1922. Introducti
Page 177 and 178: Lemos Barbosa, Antonio. 1970. Peque
Page 179 and 180: Porro, Antonio. 1994. Social Organi
Page 181: Veigl, Franz Xavier. 1789. Status p
show all

draft manuscript - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?