draft manuscript - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

More documents

Recommendations

Info

‘Teach me, does God exist?’ b. amiti muRa. amiti muRa exst 3sg.ms ‘He exists.’ (see (5.1)) (9.21) a. ta1Rakana, pekumesa tasupe, amititipa Dios? ta1Ra =kana pe= kumesa ta= =supe amiti =tipa Dios son.male.ego =pl.ms 2pl= say 1sg.ms= =goal exst =interr God ‘Children, tell me, does God exist? b. amiti muRa. amiti muRa exst 3sg.ms ‘He exists.’ (see (6.1)) 2nd Question-Response Pair These passages exhibit two noteworthy differences. First, in the question portion the Catechism Fragment passage, (9.22), exhibits a resumptive pronoun muRa 3sg.ms that is absent in the Full Catechism passage, (9.23) . The presence of this pronoun in this context is optional in the modern language, suggesting that the contributors simply opted for different constructions in this case, both grammatical. Second, the response passage that delineates the ontological status of God is more elaborated in the Catechism Fragment than in the Full Catechism, where wakutataRa ‘protector’ is absent from the latter text. Furthermore, the Catechism Fragment response exhibits two uses of the comitative postposition (=mukui) NP coordination strategy, and one use the coordination particle weRanu, both of which are absent from (9.23). The uses of the two different strategies in the Catechism Fragment are both grammatical, and constitute more masterful uses of Omagua than the simple list in the Full Catechism passage. (9.22) a. maRaitipa Dios muRa? maRai what =tipa Dios muRa =interr God 3sg.ms ‘What is God?’ b. 1watimai Ritama, aikiaRa tuyuka Ritama, upakatu maRainkanamukui, yaw1k1taRa, wakutataRa, yeneyaRasemai weRanu, muRiai Dios muRa. 1wati =mai Ritama aikiaRa tuyuka Ritama upa =katu maRain be.high.up =inact.nomz village dem.prox.ms land village all =intsf thing =kana =mukui yaw1k1 -taRa wakuta -taRa yene= yaRa =pl.ms =com make -act.nomz carry.in.arm -act.nomz 1pl.incl= master =semai weRanu muRia -i Dios muRa =verid coord thus -? God 3sg.ms ‘The Creator of Heaven, Earth and all things, the protector, and our true Lord as well, thus is God.’ (see (5.2)) (9.23) a. maRaitipa Dios? 143
maRai =tipa Dios what =interr God ‘What is God?’ b. 1watimai Ritama, aikiaRa tuyuka Ritama, upakatu maRainkana, yaw1k1taRa yaRawasu Dios muRa. 1wati =mai Ritama aikiaRa tuyuka be.high.up =inact.nomz village dem.prox.ms land =kana yaw1k1 -taRa yaRa =wasu Dios muRa =pl.ms make -act.nomz master =aug God 3sg.ms Ritama village upa all ‘God is the Creator of Heaven, Earth, and all things, the great Lord.’ (see (6.2)) =katu maRain =intsf thing 3rd Question-Response Pair The questions in this pair exhibit a difference in the presence of the interrogative clitic =tipa, which appears on the instrumental-bearing interrogative word maRi=pupe ‘with what’ in the Catechism Fragment in (9.24), but is absent on the corresponding element maRai=pupe in the Full Catechism, in (9.25) (note that the forms of the interrogative word ‘what’ are slightly different). The Full Catechism and modern Omagua exhibit the same pattern in not allowing the interrogative clitic to co-occur with a postposition, such as the instrumental =pupe, on interrogative words. If we assume that this is the correct pattern, we conclude that the contributors to the Catechism Fragment over-generalized the distribution of the interrogative clitic from interrogative words that question core arguments only to all interrogative words, include ones that question obliques. (9.24) a. maRipupetipa Dios yaw1k1 upakatu maRainkana? maRi =pupe =tipa Dios yaw1k1 upa =katu maRain =kana what =instr =interr God make all =intsf thing =pl.ms ‘With what did God make all things?’ b. Rakumesapupe puRai. Ra= kumesa =pupe puRai 3sg.ms= word =instr merely ‘Merely with his words.’ (see (5.3)) (9.25) a. maRaipupe Dios yaw1k1 1m1nua aikiaRa upakatu maRainkana? maRai what =pupe Dios yaw1k1 1m1nua aikiaRa upa =katu maRain =kana =instr God make long.ago dem.prox.ms all =intsf thing =pl.ms ‘With what did God make all these things? b. Rasemai kumesamaipupe Ra ni putaRimaipupe puRai. Ra= =semai kumesa =mai =pupe Ra= ni putaRi 3sg.ms= =excl.foc say =inact.nomz =instr 3sg.ms= ? desire =mai =inact.nomz =pupe =instr puRai contr.foc ‘With and only with his words, and not merely with his desires.’ (see (6.3)) 144
Page 1 and 2:
A Linguistic Analysis of Old Omagua
Page 3 and 4:
2.3.2 Nominal Modification . . . .
Page 5 and 6:
List of Tables 1 Morphemes and Abbr
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgments Our greatest thanks
Page 9 and 10:
fut Future tense =usu =usaRi goal G
Page 11 and 12:
=Ra nom.purp Nominal purposive nom.
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 2: Early Locations of the Om
Page 15 and 16:
of Faith. The texts were produced b
Page 17 and 18:
summarizing its publication history
Page 19 and 20:
2.1 Phonological Inventory Old Omag
Page 21 and 22:
pronouns: free pronouns are shown t
Page 23 and 24:
These phonological processes have g
Page 25 and 26:
patiRi =k1Ra usu priest =dim go ‘
Page 27 and 28:
2.2.3 Verbal Morphology In this sec
Page 29 and 30:
have presumably wanted to overtly e
Page 31 and 32:
(O’Hagan and Wauters 2012), i.e.,
Page 33 and 34:
is attested in modern Omagua, altho
Page 35 and 36:
ta= yapiSika -ta InI iSipu =pupI na
Page 37 and 38:
2.2.3.2.3 Clausal Nominalizers Old
Page 39 and 40:
2.2.3.2.4 Subject Nominalizer -suRi
Page 41 and 42:
Table 2.12: Modern Omagua Verbs Nom
Page 43 and 44:
2.3.1 Basic Clause Structure Omagua
Page 45 and 46:
Table 2.16: Order of Modern Omagua
Page 47 and 48:
(2.39) ene yumiaw1RaRaSi ta, Roaya
Page 49 and 50:
aikiaRa musap1R1ka persona =kana Ro
Page 51 and 52:
marked by the purposive =senuni (se
Page 53 and 54:
This morpheme has fallen out of the
Page 55 and 56:
‘It is Jesus Christ, the Son of G
Page 57 and 58:
e.g., if, when, since, etc. - given
Page 59 and 60:
‘You rest while we go work.’ Mo
Page 61 and 62:
yene= =ikua Ra= susana =RaSi cruz =
Page 63 and 64:
awa =kai =suaRa =puRa man =? =advbl
Page 65 and 66:
2.3.9 Non-Verbal Predication Non-ve
Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 3 Text Conventions This cha
Page 69 and 70:
given for a very similar Quechua ca
Page 71 and 72:
central vowel /1/. The high central
Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 4 Lord’s Prayer 4.1 Bibli
Page 75 and 76:
text is unclear, although it should
Page 77 and 78:
(4.2) a. Ene nuamai ritama teneruri
Page 79 and 80:
ename 139 ne= iSaRi tanu 140 ukukui
Page 81 and 82:
The Jesuit missionary mentioned in
Page 83 and 84:
(5.2) a. i. Maraitipa Dios mura? ii
Page 85 and 86:
(5.5) a. i. Aguerepa Dios amiti? ii
Page 87 and 88:
. i. Dios semai raicua zenoni, mura
Page 89 and 90:
ii. Dios Taegrasemai, Ahua guaca em
Page 91 and 92:
La copia del original me fue entreg
Page 93 and 94:
(6.3) a. i. Mara e pupe Dios yahueq
Page 95 and 96:
(6.7) a. i. Marae rapa Dios yahuequ
Page 97 and 98:
(6.10) a. i. Ayquiara musa puereca
Page 99 and 100:
ii. Virgen Santa Maria ceuecacuarap
Page 101 and 102:
iii. yeneikua RasusanaRaSi, cruzaRi
Page 103 and 104:
(6.20) a. i. Era Xtiano cana Dios c
Page 105 and 106: ii. Roaya, miaracanayacatu yennezum
Page 107 and 108: (6.26) a. i. Mura quarasschi pupe m
Page 109 and 110: (6.28) a. i. Mare tipa Ahuacana y a
Page 111 and 112: target: ‘Grieving with all their
Page 113 and 114: iii. m1t1R1pe 1p1sasui comulgayaRay
Page 115 and 116: muRia -i ta= saRa ta= ĩya =mukui =
Page 117 and 118: Chapter 7 Profession of Faith Below
Page 119 and 120: c. upai tautSakana eRa taconfesayaR
Page 121 and 122: When Uriarte and his Jesuit compani
Page 123 and 124: Uriarte’s own, and as such we do
Page 125 and 126: (Uriarte [1776]1986:ibid.) goes on
Page 127 and 128: wiSani =puRa tenepeta 290 muRa be.d
Page 129 and 130: eRaya usu yene= patiRi =kana well g
Page 131 and 132: 9.1 Jesuit Interactions with the Om
Page 133 and 134: Ecuador), 314 were sent to found a
Page 135 and 136: of Kambeba lived as far downriver a
Page 137 and 138: empeño para (sic) entroducir en la
Page 139 and 140: There is ample evidence that Quechu
Page 141 and 142: Chantre y Herrera (1901:93) similar
Page 143 and 144: El P. Ignacio María Franciscis fue
Page 145 and 146: versions of ecclesiastical texts in
Page 147 and 148: 9.3 Jesuit Language Use in Old Omag
Page 149 and 150: (9.8) wakutatara wakuta -tara carry
Page 151 and 152: espíritu santo =sui muRa virgen sa
Page 153 and 154: the former Spanish sense was the on
Page 155: A passive-like effect is achieved b
Page 159 and 160: ‘Where is God?’ b. 1watimai Rit
Page 161 and 162: maRai =ikua =tipa Dios yaw1k1 upa =
Page 163 and 164: aikiaRa musap1R1ka persona =kana uy
Page 165 and 166: Table 9.2: Summary of Grammatical D
Page 167 and 168: ely on translation from a Quechua m
Page 169 and 170: Jesuits succeeded in bringing a sig
Page 171 and 172: conclusion to be drawn from the his
Page 173 and 174: Cabral, Ana Suelly Arruda Camara an
Page 175 and 176: Edmundson, George. 1922. Introducti
Page 177 and 178: Lemos Barbosa, Antonio. 1970. Peque
Page 179 and 180: Porro, Antonio. 1994. Social Organi
Page 181: Veigl, Franz Xavier. 1789. Status p
show all

draft manuscript - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?