20.01.2014 Views

draft manuscript - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

draft manuscript - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

draft manuscript - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 9.1: Jesuit Missionaries Among the Omagua, 1621-1768<br />

Name 322 Origin Period Location 323<br />

Simón de Rojas ??? 1621 Aguarico River<br />

Humberto Coronado ??? 1621 ""<br />

Samuel Fritz Bohemia 324 1685–1704 San Joaquín and downriver<br />

Wenzel Breyer Bohemia 1698–1706(?) 325 ""<br />

Franz Vidra Bohemia 1698–1701–? 326 ""<br />

Giovanni Battista Sanna Sardinia 1701–1710 ""<br />

Juan de Zaldarriaga Spain 1715–1716 lower Ucayali<br />

Luis Coronado Spain 1719–1721 lower Ucayali & San Joaquín<br />

Bernard Zurmühlen Westphalia 327 1723–1726 San Joaquín<br />

Johannes Baptist Julian Bavaria 1723–? ""<br />

Wilhelm Grebmer Baden ?–1735–? Yurimaguas (Huallaga River)<br />

Karl Brentan Hungary ?–1737–? San Joaquín<br />

Ignatius Mickel Austria ??? ???<br />

Martín Iriarte Spain 1748–1756 San Joaquín<br />

Manuel Joaquín Uriarte Spain 1756–1764 ""<br />

Josef Palme Bohemia 1764–1768 ""<br />

It is also important to note that not all the Omaguas on the Amazon River during who survived<br />

the Portuguese slave raids fled upriver towards San Joaquín de Omaguas during the period beginning<br />

in the 1690s. Significant numbers <strong>of</strong> Omagua remained in Portuguese territory, particularly in and<br />

around what is the now the Brazilian town <strong>of</strong> São Paulo de Olivença, where they came to be called<br />

called ‘Kambebas’. 328 This town had originally been founded by Fritz in approximately 1693, and<br />

orginally named San Pablo de Omaguas (Anonymous [1731]1922:31, 91). 329 As late as 1987 speakers<br />

sea); and Ignacio Servela (vital information unknown) (Jouanen 1943:726, 728, 736). We do not include them in<br />

this table because we have been unable to determine the nature or length <strong>of</strong> their missionary activities with the<br />

Omagua, though they appear to be minimal.<br />

323 Note that the name ‘San Joaquín de Omaguas’ refers to several distinct locations from 1689 forward. The San<br />

Joaquín <strong>of</strong> Fritz and Sanna’s day was located near the mouth the Ampiyacu river; the San Joaquín established by<br />

Coronado was just above the mouth <strong>of</strong> the Nanay; and the San Joaquín established by Zurmühlen was approximately<br />

one half day’s travel upriver <strong>of</strong> this site, and was located near to the modern community <strong>of</strong> San Salvador de<br />

Omaguas (Tessmann (1930:48), Myers (1992:140-141), O’Hagan (2012a)). Modern-day San Joaquín de Omaguas<br />

is yet further upriver, and appears to have been first established between 1862 and 1876 from a population <strong>of</strong><br />

Omagua working under the rubber baron Sinforoso Collantes (O’Hagan 2012a).<br />

324 Note that Bohemia was at the time <strong>of</strong> Fritz’s birth under the rule <strong>of</strong> the Habsburg monarchy, and corresponds to<br />

the majority <strong>of</strong> the modern-day Czech Republic.<br />

325 Wenzel Breyer was appointed Vice Superior in November 1706 when Fritz undertook his second journey to Quito<br />

(Anonymous [1731]1922:117), although it is unclear if he missionized in Omagua communities up to that time.<br />

326 The last mention <strong>of</strong> Vidra working in Omagua territory that we have located is upon Fritz’s return from Quito in<br />

August 1701.<br />

327 For those missionaries <strong>of</strong> greater German descent, we provide the name <strong>of</strong> the independent Germanic margraviate<br />

(German Markgrafschaft), duchy (German Herzogtum) or electorate (German Kurfürstentum) extant over the area<br />

in and during the time at which they were born, given that Germany was not unified until 1871.<br />

328 See Jorna (1991), Bonin and Cruz da Silva (1999) and Maciel (2000, 2003) (and references therein) for a history<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Kambeba in this region.<br />

329 Loureiro (1978:95) erroneously gives 1689 as the founding date for San Pablo de Omaguas, but see Anonymous<br />

([1731]1922:91) for a clear refutation <strong>of</strong> this.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!