19.01.2014 Views

Wüest M. 51 Wykes M. 82 Yamaguchi M. 17 Ybarra G. 129 Yubero F ...

Wüest M. 51 Wykes M. 82 Yamaguchi M. 17 Ybarra G. 129 Yubero F ...

Wüest M. 51 Wykes M. 82 Yamaguchi M. 17 Ybarra G. 129 Yubero F ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JUNE 28 WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON<br />

RIVA-SS-WeA-P.3 ELECTRON STIMULATED DESORPTION STUDY OF DEFCT<br />

SITES ON THE MgO(100) SURFACE USING QUADRUPOLE MASS SPECTROMETRY<br />

AND TIME OF FLIGHT. I. Colera * , J. L. de Segovia ** , D. Cáceres * , E. Román ** and R. González<br />

* . * Departamento de Física. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Leganés. 28911 Madrid. Spain. **<br />

Laboratorio de Física e Ingeniería de Superficies. Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales.<br />

CSIC.Cantoblanco. 28049 Madrid. Spain<br />

While the quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS) is an excellent tool to identify desorbed ions and<br />

energy thresholds in electron stimulated desorption (ESD) experiments, its analysis of the ion kinetic<br />

energy distribution is questionable. However, time of flight (TOF) is an excellent technique to<br />

analyse the ion energies by using the QMS as the driving tube for the time of flight. The simultaneous<br />

use of the ESDQMS and ESDTOF techniques yields excellent results in the determination of the<br />

ion nature, ion threshold, and ion energy distribution in the study of site defects of on the MgO(100)<br />

surface. Defect sites are identified by exposing the MgO(100) surface to D 2 O and H 2 18 O. Thus, the<br />

D and 18 O can be differentiated from the 16 O and H surface atoms. The energy of the exploring electrons<br />

varied from 200 to 600 eV, and an intensity of 100 nA was used to avoid surface damage. The<br />

sample charge was also studied as a function of the incident electron en energy.<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!