19.01.2014 Views

Current State of the Market - icmif

Current State of the Market - icmif

Current State of the Market - icmif

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MORO 2012<br />

<strong>Current</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reinsurance market<br />

Paddy Jago<br />

May 2012


The current state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reinsurance<br />

market<br />

• External factors<br />

• Where are we in <strong>the</strong> market cycle?<br />

• What this means for Mutuals<br />

• Addressing <strong>the</strong>se issues<br />

2


MORO 2012<br />

<strong>Current</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reinsurance market<br />

External factors


External factors<br />

Economic crisis &<br />

Sovereign Debt<br />

Regulatory<br />

Change<br />

Reinsurance<br />

<strong>Market</strong><br />

Catastrophe<br />

Losses<br />

Catastrophe model<br />

change<br />

4


Economic Crisis & Sovereign Debt<br />

• Economic Crisis<br />

– Asset impairment<br />

– Investment difficulties<br />

– … but no evidence that traditional re/insurance holds systemic risks<br />

• Impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Eurozone Debt Crisis on Insurer Solvency?<br />

– Implicit and explicit threats to insurer security<br />

– Issues if one or more sovereigns exiting <strong>the</strong> Euro<br />

– But … <strong>the</strong> sector has proven itself resilient<br />

• Insurers are different from Banks<br />

– Insurers are significant investors in Eurozone sovereign / financial sector<br />

debt;<br />

– However, exposure differs from banks in many key respects<br />

5


Catastrophic losses<br />

- Events <strong>of</strong> 2011<br />

Source: MR NatCatSERVICE<br />

6


Catastrophic losses<br />

- Most Costly World Insurance Losses, 1970-2011<br />

50<br />

45<br />

Source; Sources: Swiss Re sigma 1/2011; Munich Re; Insurance Information Institute research.<br />

40<br />

Insured Loss (USDm)<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Hurricane Hugo<br />

(1989)<br />

Winter Storm Daria<br />

(1991)<br />

Chile Quake (2010)<br />

Hurricane Ivan<br />

(2004)<br />

Typhoon Mirielle<br />

(1991)<br />

Charley (2004)<br />

Thailand Floods<br />

(2011)<br />

Wilma (2005)<br />

New Zealand<br />

Quake (2011)<br />

Hurricane Ike<br />

(2008)<br />

Northridge EQ<br />

(1994)<br />

Spring Tornadoes/<br />

Storms (2011)<br />

WTC Terror Attack<br />

(2001)<br />

Hurricane Andrew<br />

(1992)<br />

Japan Quake,<br />

Tsunami (2011)<br />

Hurricane Katrina<br />

(2005)<br />

1970 - 2010 2011<br />

7


Catastrophic losses<br />

- 1988 to 2011<br />

140,000<br />

Source; Swiss Re Economic Research & Consulting<br />

120,000<br />

100,000<br />

Insured Loss (USDm)<br />

80,000<br />

60,000<br />

40,000<br />

20,000<br />

0<br />

1988<br />

1989<br />

1990<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

Wea<strong>the</strong>r-related Earthquake/tsunami Man-made disasters<br />

8


Catastrophic losses<br />

Event Loss (USD) Issue<br />

Australia Floods<br />

3 bn<br />

Little modelling or exposure<br />

monitoring<br />

Japan EQ & Tsunami 35 bn Only partially modelled<br />

US Tornadoes 19 bn Extreme frequency<br />

New Zealand EQ 20 bn Significant modelling issues<br />

• 2011; <strong>the</strong> highest loss year on record<br />

for economic losses<br />

– USD 380bn in economic losses<br />

globally<br />

– USD 270bn in 2005 previous<br />

highest<br />

• USD 105 bn in insured losses globally<br />

– 2 nd only to 2005 (inflation<br />

adjusted)<br />

– > 5x 30 year average <strong>of</strong> USD<br />

19bn<br />

Hurricane Irene 4 bn Extreme flooding<br />

Thailand<br />

12 bn<br />

Little modelling or exposure<br />

monitoring<br />

9


Catastrophic losses<br />

- What have we learned?<br />

• Insured losses still a small percentage <strong>of</strong> economic loss<br />

– An long-term <strong>the</strong>me that commercial insurers struggle to address<br />

– Opportunity for <strong>the</strong> cooperative movement<br />

• The “tail is always bigger than we think<br />

• It’s easy to understate “time element” losses<br />

– Denial <strong>of</strong> access<br />

– Business Interruption<br />

– Contingent Business Interruption<br />

• A global contagion?<br />

Sendai Airport, source; National Geographic<br />

• Catastrophe models have under-performed<br />

– Coverage<br />

– Secondary and contributing perils<br />

Source; NOAA<br />

10


Model change<br />

• Catastrophe models change frequently<br />

– New science, new loss experience<br />

– RMS v11 Europe Windstorm<br />

• Hazard increases<br />

• Explicit clustering<br />

– RMS v11 US Hurricane<br />

• Medium Term Rates<br />

• Storm surge<br />

• In-land filling<br />

• 2011 saw an unprecedented level <strong>of</strong> change<br />

– Especially in Europe & USA<br />

– Around 250 new or upgrades from a total <strong>of</strong> 450 territory peril<br />

combinations<br />

• Model change affects<br />

– Underwriting & business planning<br />

– Portfolio management<br />

– Reinsurance purchasing<br />

– Capital management<br />

– Regulatory<br />

v10<br />

v11<br />

11


Regulatory Change<br />

• Regulatory change is everywhere<br />

– But felt most acutely as a result <strong>of</strong> SII<br />

• Regulation is becoming global<br />

– A spreading <strong>of</strong> good and bad regulatory ideas?<br />

• Will this result in<br />

increased understanding <strong>of</strong> risk?<br />

A clean-up <strong>of</strong> poorly capitalised companies?<br />

best practice and better understanding <strong>of</strong> cat<br />

models?<br />

• But at what cost?<br />

Increased consumer costs<br />

Increased reinsurance costs<br />

Enormous regulatory burden<br />

12


ICMIF Solvency II Solutions<br />

One Day Seminar<br />

• WHEN: May 24, 2012<br />

• WHERE: Willis Re, The Willis Building, 51 Lime Street, London,<br />

EC3M 7DQ, UK<br />

• HOSTED BY: ICMIF Supporting Members<br />

• REGISTER NOW: http://www.<strong>icmif</strong>.org/solvency2012<br />

– Managing Insurance Risk for Pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

– Being Ahead <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Curve in Asset Management<br />

– Optimising Internal Risk Management Practices beyond<br />

Solvency II Compliance Requirements<br />

– Rating Agency and Political Perspectives on Transparency<br />

and Reporting<br />

• Speakers<br />

– Jonathan Evans, MP - key note speaker<br />

– A.M. Best Europe, INVESCO, PartnerRe, Risk Dynamics &<br />

Willis Re<br />

13


MORO 2012<br />

Where are we in <strong>the</strong> market cycle?


Where are we in <strong>the</strong> market cycle?<br />

- Selected recent renewals<br />

Territory<br />

Loss free<br />

excess <strong>of</strong> loss<br />

Loss affected<br />

excess <strong>of</strong> loss<br />

Comments<br />

Australasia +15 to +35% +40% to +75%<br />

Australasia (inc. NZ) - +80 to +150%<br />

Significant losses<br />

China 0% to +15% - EQ exposure driving pricing<br />

Europe +1% to +4% -<br />

France 0% to +3% -<br />

Broadly loss free, o<strong>the</strong>r than Nordic<br />

Nordic +5% to +10% +25% to +50%<br />

Japan +20% to +30% +30% to +50% In addition to prior year increases<br />

Taiwan > +30% - Concern over EQ and CBI<br />

US Nationwide +2.5% to +10% - Losses and model change<br />

15


Where are we in <strong>the</strong> market cycle?<br />

• Where are we in <strong>the</strong> market cycle<br />

– AM Best “Critically, <strong>the</strong> market seems poised for a<br />

turn” January 2012<br />

– Hardening in response to major losses<br />

– … but only spotty increases in loss free territories<br />

• Reinsurers under pressure<br />

– USD 50 bn <strong>of</strong> losses to <strong>the</strong> reinsurance sector in 2<br />

years<br />

– Manageable from a capital perspective<br />

– <strong>Market</strong>’s capital remains strong for 2012<br />

• Not a “proper” hard market<br />

– No dislocation<br />

– Capacity remains available<br />

– Little in <strong>the</strong> way <strong>of</strong> capital impairment<br />

Estimated <strong>Market</strong> Capitalisation<br />

500 bn<br />

450 bn<br />

400 bn<br />

350 bn<br />

• Are we entering an era <strong>of</strong> “Micro-cycles”?<br />

300 bn<br />

– Dependant on line <strong>of</strong> business<br />

– Dependant on geography<br />

– Not necessarily industry-wide<br />

250 bn<br />

2007 2007-<br />

2008<br />

2008-<br />

2009<br />

2009-<br />

2010<br />

2010-<br />

2011<br />

2011<br />

16


Reinsurance market cycles<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

Rates Rise<br />

Greater<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability<br />

New capital<br />

attracted<br />

Pricing<br />

decreases<br />

Catastrophes<br />

Reserve erosion<br />

Underwriting losses<br />

Asset impairment<br />

Traditional market cycles<br />

• Reactive to major market events<br />

• High barriers to entry<br />

• Multi-year cycles<br />

17


Reinsurance market cycles<br />

Rates Rise<br />

Rates Rise<br />

New capital attracted<br />

Greater<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability<br />

<strong>Market</strong> flattens<br />

New capital<br />

attracted<br />

Pricing<br />

decreases<br />

Pricing<br />

decreases<br />

Is <strong>the</strong>re still a macro cycle?<br />

• Reduced barriers to entry<br />

• New products and investment strategies<br />

• New capital anticipates market hardening<br />

• Continued over-capitalisation<br />

18


MORO 2012<br />

<strong>Current</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reinsurance market<br />

What this means for Mutuals


Universal qualities <strong>of</strong> mutuals<br />

Focus and homogeneity<br />

• Homogeneity<br />

• Focus on one market segment<br />

• No incentive to move in and out<br />

<strong>of</strong> product lines<br />

• Highly motivated to remain<br />

relevant to membership<br />

• Explains extraordinary focus on<br />

product and service when<br />

compared to for pr<strong>of</strong>it market<br />

Focus<br />

20


Universal qualities <strong>of</strong> mutuals<br />

Commitment to Policyholders<br />

• Unrivalled product and customer<br />

support<br />

• Long term perspective<br />

• Maintain availability <strong>of</strong><br />

appropriate limits<br />

• Realistic pricing – <strong>of</strong>ten in <strong>the</strong><br />

face <strong>of</strong> bitter commercial market<br />

competition<br />

• Dividends when results exceed<br />

expectations<br />

Focus<br />

Commitment<br />

21


Universal qualities <strong>of</strong> mutuals<br />

Consistent value over time<br />

• Maintaining coverage and limits<br />

at lowest sustainable price<br />

• Reduced loss costs through<br />

cutting edge loss prevention<br />

• Reduce claims costs with<br />

specialist expertise<br />

• For pr<strong>of</strong>it markets have moved in<br />

and out at whim<br />

Focus<br />

Commitment<br />

Consistency<br />

22


Universal qualities <strong>of</strong> mutuals<br />

Unrivalled service<br />

• Tailored products, adapted as<br />

needed<br />

• Intimate knowledge <strong>of</strong>, and direct<br />

communication with members<br />

• The “for pr<strong>of</strong>it” market serves<br />

multiple constituencies and<br />

cannot match service level<br />

Focus<br />

Service<br />

Commitment<br />

Consistency<br />

23


Challenges faced by mutuals<br />

Relentless<br />

competition<br />

Smaller size<br />

Outside<br />

Insurance<br />

market<br />

mainstream<br />

Concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> risk<br />

Stakeholder<br />

balance<br />

24


What this means for Mutuals<br />

Relentless competition Reinsurance shouldn’t restrict <strong>the</strong> coverage you give<br />

Outside Insurance market mainstream Reinsurance relationships should inform, not be transactional<br />

Equity between different stakeholders Consistent approach to underwriting<br />

Working with one affinity group Risk concentration need reinsurance to manage peaks<br />

Smaller Size Capital is precious<br />

Mutuals need preferred treatment when accessing<br />

Reinsurance capital<br />

25


MORO 2012<br />

<strong>Current</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reinsurance market<br />

Addressing <strong>the</strong>se issues


Addressing <strong>the</strong>se issues<br />

• Diversification<br />

• Mutual reinsurers<br />

• Multi Year reinsurance<br />

• Pooling Risk<br />

27


Diversification<br />

• We have chosen this week to launch a new report;<br />

Diversification challenges and opportunities for Mutuals<br />

• Key lessons; pursue diversification only where<br />

– It is in line with <strong>the</strong> long-term aims <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

organisation<br />

– Stands a reasonable chance <strong>of</strong> being pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />

– Does not come at <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> a loss <strong>of</strong> focus<br />

on o<strong>the</strong>r aspects <strong>of</strong> business<br />

28


Mutual reinsurers<br />

• Like minded partners<br />

– Significant financial strength already<br />

within <strong>the</strong> movement<br />

– Starting on <strong>the</strong> same page<br />

– A long history <strong>of</strong> service<br />

– No need to explain who you are<br />

29


Multi Year reinsurance<br />

Year 1 <strong>of</strong> 3<br />

Year 2 <strong>of</strong> 3 Year 3 <strong>of</strong> 3<br />

Open market reinsurance Open market reinsurance Open market reinsurance<br />

Multi-year<br />

(1 <strong>of</strong> 3)<br />

Single<br />

Year<br />

Multi-year<br />

(2 <strong>of</strong> 3)<br />

Multi-year<br />

(1 <strong>of</strong> 3)<br />

Single<br />

Year<br />

Multi-year<br />

(3 <strong>of</strong> 3)<br />

Multi-year<br />

(2 <strong>of</strong> 3)<br />

Multi-year<br />

(1 <strong>of</strong> 3)<br />

Retention Retention Retention<br />

30


Pooling Risk<br />

• Good examples already available<br />

– Latin American Reinsurance Group<br />

– Fire Facultative Facility<br />

10.00%<br />

Potential Cost Savings<br />

• Shared XL purchase<br />

– A High Layer Catastrophe Excess <strong>of</strong><br />

Loss<br />

– Joint purchase by 3 – 6 ICMIF members<br />

– Derive cost savings from<br />

Layer Rate on Line<br />

8.00%<br />

6.00%<br />

4.00%<br />

2.10%<br />

2.25%<br />

1.75%<br />

3.13%<br />

• Capital efficiencies from reduction in<br />

“redundant” top layer limits<br />

• Diversification within layer<br />

2.00%<br />

3.00%<br />

6.00%<br />

• Bulk purchasing power<br />

0.00%<br />

• An ICMIF Reinsurer or SPV?<br />

Company A<br />

Company B<br />

Company C<br />

Company D<br />

Potential Savings<br />

Shared Layer<br />

31


Conclusion<br />

• The needs <strong>of</strong> a Mutual insurance company (including reinsurance)<br />

• The current state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reinsurance market<br />

• The challenges faced by both<br />

• Working toge<strong>the</strong>r to build reinsurance solutions<br />

A mutual understanding = a mutual future<br />

32


MORO 2012<br />

<strong>Current</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reinsurance market

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!