26.10.2012 Views

The Contribution of Women to Peace and Reconciliation

The Contribution of Women to Peace and Reconciliation

The Contribution of Women to Peace and Reconciliation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

are sufficient, it would be enough <strong>to</strong> try <strong>to</strong> find some human reality that<br />

is not subsumed under them, <strong>and</strong> depended on fac<strong>to</strong>rs different from<br />

those three. One might make it a parlour game.<br />

In addition, these three fac<strong>to</strong>rs outline the current core issues for Rw<strong>and</strong>ans.<br />

Kuba is the issue <strong>of</strong> identity: What are Rw<strong>and</strong>ans, that do they<br />

want <strong>to</strong> be, what do we want them <strong>to</strong> be? Kubaho is the problem <strong>of</strong><br />

survival <strong>of</strong> the one <strong>and</strong> the other, particularly the survival <strong>of</strong> those whose<br />

extermination was attempted. Kubana is the problem <strong>of</strong> coexistence,<br />

particularly among victims <strong>and</strong> perpetra<strong>to</strong>rs. This is the problem <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rules <strong>of</strong> coexistence, hence the choice <strong>of</strong> a project for society. All these<br />

problems may appear theoretical at first glance, but are really very concrete<br />

<strong>and</strong> immediate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Corners<strong>to</strong>ne <strong>of</strong> Coexistence: Rw<strong>and</strong>aness (Being Rw<strong>and</strong>an): Everything<br />

is as if, in the beginning, the Rw<strong>and</strong>ans, finding themselves in each<br />

other’s presence <strong>and</strong> discovering that they were different, had felt the<br />

need <strong>to</strong> be the same in some way. <strong>The</strong>y were (kuba), that was obvious;<br />

<strong>and</strong> they were there, <strong>and</strong> at that time (kubaho); all that remained was <strong>to</strong><br />

organize their coexistence (kubana).<br />

<strong>The</strong> best way they found <strong>to</strong> be somehow the same was <strong>to</strong> invent (in the<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> discovery, invention) the myth <strong>of</strong> Gihanga: Gihanga was the man<br />

<strong>of</strong> creativity (guhanga) <strong>and</strong> accomplished knowledge (ubuhanga), whose<br />

son Kanyarw<strong>and</strong>a begat Gatwa, Gahutu <strong>and</strong> Gatutsi. Thus did Kanyarw<strong>and</strong>a,<br />

son <strong>of</strong> Gihanga, combine the three sons <strong>to</strong> a new common identity:<br />

Rw<strong>and</strong>aness. Myth or his<strong>to</strong>ry? That is <strong>of</strong> small consequence.<br />

On this corners<strong>to</strong>ne <strong>of</strong> Rw<strong>and</strong>aness, the three brothers became one<br />

(Rw<strong>and</strong>ans), built a country <strong>to</strong>gether, initially with set boundaries, even<br />

if they were exp<strong>and</strong>able, a nation, with a common home, a common<br />

language, a common culture, etc.; in short, Rw<strong>and</strong>a.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Failure <strong>of</strong> Equality: Throughout Rw<strong>and</strong>a’s his<strong>to</strong>ry, the myth <strong>of</strong> equality<br />

between brothers experienced many difficulties in embedding itself<br />

in the concrete facts <strong>of</strong> everyday life, it even experienced failure. We<br />

will first see the origins <strong>of</strong> the failure <strong>of</strong> the idea <strong>of</strong> equality <strong>and</strong> then the<br />

journey from the idea <strong>of</strong> difference <strong>to</strong> the idea <strong>of</strong> extermination.<br />

162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!