17.01.2014 Views

Bar-Coded Boarding Passes (BCBP) Implementation guide - IATA

Bar-Coded Boarding Passes (BCBP) Implementation guide - IATA

Bar-Coded Boarding Passes (BCBP) Implementation guide - IATA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction<br />

2.5.4. Key differentiators between the <strong>IATA</strong> 2D standard and its alternatives<br />

Differentiator Description <strong>IATA</strong> 2D standard Alternatives<br />

Interline through<br />

check-in<br />

Multiple<br />

segments<br />

Interoperability<br />

Cost of migration<br />

Biometrics<br />

<strong>Boarding</strong> passes<br />

for the entire<br />

journey on interline<br />

partner flights<br />

Enables a single<br />

boarding pass valid<br />

for multiple flight<br />

segments on the<br />

same journey.<br />

The systems<br />

operate together<br />

correctly on<br />

Common Use<br />

Terminal<br />

Equipment.<br />

Migration from<br />

airline’s existing<br />

solution for<br />

boarding passes to<br />

the <strong>IATA</strong> standard<br />

2D bar code.<br />

Biometrics enable a<br />

secure ID check at<br />

boarding. A<br />

template containing<br />

finger print data is<br />

stored on the<br />

boarding pass.<br />

The <strong>IATA</strong> standard<br />

enables each interline<br />

through check-in partner to<br />

issue a standard boarding<br />

pass for another segment<br />

on a different carrier.<br />

Fitting several segments<br />

on one document saves<br />

paper, for the customer<br />

and the carrier who have<br />

to print one page in total<br />

instead of one page per<br />

segment and reduces<br />

hassle for the passenger.<br />

The standard guarantees<br />

that when a carrier wants<br />

to issue a 2D bar coded<br />

boarding pass in an<br />

airport, it can rely on an<br />

<strong>IATA</strong> standard.<br />

The data storage capacity<br />

of 2D bar codes is similar<br />

to magnetic stripes. The<br />

items required in <strong>BCBP</strong><br />

are similar to ATB. The<br />

software cost of migration<br />

is limited.<br />

Storing the image of the<br />

fingerprint is only possible<br />

on a smartcard. However a<br />

template with 256<br />

characters could be used<br />

to represent a fingerprint,<br />

which could be stored in a<br />

2D bar code, for instance<br />

in the individual airline use<br />

field.<br />

Issuing a boarding pass<br />

for a segment requires<br />

knowing the type of bar<br />

code used by the carrier.<br />

Many types of 1D bar<br />

codes are used (e.g.<br />

code 128, code 2-of-5)<br />

and the layout of the data<br />

in each code may vary.<br />

The ATB standard<br />

requires one document<br />

per segment. 1D bar<br />

code documents can also<br />

handle only one<br />

segment.<br />

When issuing a 1D bar<br />

code the carrier should<br />

make sure that the gate<br />

readers and kiosk<br />

printers are capable of<br />

printing and reading the<br />

format and layout of the<br />

bar code, as well as<br />

check that the local<br />

DCS/boarding application<br />

will handle the data<br />

correctly.<br />

1D bar codes can<br />

replace manual<br />

operations such as<br />

keying a sequence<br />

number but do not<br />

replace the reading of<br />

ATB and the collection of<br />

data.<br />

A 1D bar code is limited<br />

to 30 characters on a<br />

typical boarding pass and<br />

cannot be used to store<br />

biometrics.<br />

4 th edition - June 2009 - www.iata.org/stb/bcbp 11/128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!