TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands
TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands
60 IMPROVEMENT OF TROPICAL AND SUBTROPIOAL RANGELANDS • lAnd. In the broadest BeDH, land includes all natural resources such as air, minerals, lOils, natural vegetation, and water. • lAbor and management. These are the resources furnished directly by humans. • Capital. This refers to the intermediate products (inputs) created from land, labor, and funds used in further production. Capital is both the money ueed to pay for inputs, and the buildings, machinery, livestock, and purchased inputs that can be valued in dollars or local currency. Organizations must conscientiously attempt to guide the allocation of their physical, financial, and adminiatrative resources among sectors and competing programs to further national objectives (figure 3-1). This is true whether the resources committed are being invested by the government directly or by individuals within the economy. The concept of economic rationality is a central consideration of economic theory and the definition given above. A rational economic person, or consumer, ia one who seeks to maximize utility or satisfaction. There is often a close identification between farmers' or pastoralists' consumption and their production decisions. Personal preferences also affect decisions within the agricultural or natural resource development sphere. Some decisions may be made to enhance prestige or status with a peer group. Some may reflect consumption rather than production expenditures. As mentioned previously, however, nonrational behavior may be difficult to judge, in particular by those outside the culture. What seems nonrational to an urban dweller from the industrilized world may be quite rational when examined in the correct cultural context. Therefore, in determining proper economic behavior, what outsiders consider maximum utility may not be in the best long-term interest of pastoralists. Clearly, before a rational economic strategy can be formulated, the culture and traditional economic behavior must be understood. PROJECT ANALYSIS Agricultural or natural resource developments might best be defined, explained, analyzed, and understood as ·projects." Projected cash flows over a period of time are required for comparisons among alternative development projects or other investment decisions. In defining a project, Gittinger (1982) said: We generally think of an agricultural project .. an investment
THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 61 CAlIH_11ON ~--------------~ I Ii il r;====::;jt:~=~r_,:",~:-~;--~~i:__-' I I CnIogt....,. ~_ ~AA*If t e- _ Full HOUIIHOl.D .. _~l!£T~_~.J! FIGURE 3-1 Pastoral Economi... activity in which financial resources are expended to create capital useu that produce benefits over an extended period of time. In lOme projects, however, COlts are incurred for production expenses or maintenance from which benefits CaD normally be expected quickly, Ulually within about a year. Range or marginal land development projects (such as seeding) can be viewed in the same terms as an agricultural project, although the investments, costs, and returns may be substantially different
- Page 19: OVERVIEW 9 of approaching this obje
- Page 23 and 24: Introduction In this report, rangel
- Page 25 and 26: INTRODUCTION 15 protein per hour of
- Page 27 and 28: INTRODUOTION 17 Moreover, grain cro
- Page 29 and 30: Sudan 66 million hectlln8 (permanen
- Page 31 and 32: Zambia Countrywide, Upper Zambesi (
- Page 33 and 34: People's Democratic Republic ofVeme
- Page 35 and 36: Saudi Arabia Countrywide 85 miIllon
- Page 37 and 38: Arghaniatan 30 million hectara Low
- Page 39 and 40: INTRODUCTION 29 knowledge, adaptati
- Page 41 and 42: 1 The Nature ofTropical and Subtrop
- Page 43 and 44: THE NATURE 0' TROPIOAL AND SUBTROPI
- Page 45 and 46: THE NA.TURE OF TROP/OAL AND SUBTROP
- Page 47 and 48: THE NATURE OF TROPICAL AND SUBTROPI
- Page 49 and 50: TllB aoorAL aoNTEXT FOR RANGELAND I
- Page 51 and 52: THE SOOIAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 53 and 54: THE SOOIAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 55 and 56: THE SOOIAL CONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 57 and 58: T11B aOorAL OONTl:XT FOR RANQIILAND
- Page 59 and 60: THE SOorAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 61 and 62: THE SOOIAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 63 and 64: THE SOOIAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 65 and 66: THE ECONOMIC CONTEXT 55 proved extr
- Page 67 and 68: THE ECONOMIC CONTEXT 57 • The cas
- Page 69: THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 59 Climate and
- Page 73 and 74: THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 63 and returns
- Page 75 and 76: THE ECONOMIC CONTEXT 65 The basic p
- Page 77 and 78: THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 67 can give a
- Page 79 and 80: THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 69 evaluation.
- Page 81 and 82: THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 71 fashion or
- Page 83 and 84: 4 Regional Resource Assessment The
- Page 85 and 86: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 75 onl
- Page 87 and 88: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 77 wil
- Page 89 and 90: REGIONAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT 79 spe
- Page 91 and 92: REGIONAL RESOUROB ASSB88MENT 81 Aqa
- Page 93 and 94: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 83 imp
- Page 95 and 96: REGIONAL RESOUROE AS8mJSMENT 85 60
- Page 97 and 98: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSB88JlENT 87 Ta
- Page 99 and 100: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 89 •
- Page 101 and 102: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 91 FIG
- Page 103 and 104: N r;; (L ~ C) o ~ -rv • 01 . •
- Page 105 and 106: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 95 The
- Page 107 and 108: SITE EVALUATION 97 The natural proc
- Page 109 and 110: SIT8 EVALUATION 99 Climate is diffi
- Page 111 and 112: SITB EVALUATION 101 Instantaneous m
- Page 113 and 114: SITE EVALUATION 103 by field observ
- Page 115 and 116: SITE EVALUATION 105 dynamics ofan e
- Page 117 and 118: SITE EVALUATION 107 macbiuery at le
- Page 119 and 120: SIT8 EVALUATION 109 the better is t
THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT<br />
61<br />
CAlIH_11ON<br />
~--------------~<br />
I<br />
Ii<br />
il r;====::;jt:~=~r_,:",~:-~;--~~i:__-'<br />
I<br />
I<br />
CnIogt....,.<br />
~_ ~AA*If<br />
t e- _ Full<br />
HOUIIHOl.D<br />
..<br />
_~l!£T~_~.J!<br />
FIGURE 3-1<br />
Pastoral Economi...<br />
activity in which financial resources are expended to create capital<br />
useu that produce benefits over an extended period of time.<br />
In lOme projects, however, COlts are incurred for production<br />
expenses or maintenance from which benefits CaD normally be<br />
expected quickly, Ulually within about a year.<br />
Range or marginal l<strong>and</strong> development projects (such as seeding) can<br />
be viewed in the same terms as an agricultural project, although<br />
the investments, costs, <strong>and</strong> returns may be substantially different