17.01.2014 Views

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56 IMPROVEMENT OF TROPICAL AND SUBTROPICAL RANGELANDS<br />

to personal preferences, capabilities, <strong>and</strong> available technologies. The<br />

major factors that influence productivity are determined by the characteristics<br />

-<strong>and</strong> interactions of (1) the physical environment, (2) the<br />

economic environment, <strong>and</strong> (3) the social environment. Subsystems<br />

can be recognized within range systems. Interdependencies <strong>and</strong> interactions<br />

among resources (l<strong>and</strong>, labor, crops, livestock, capital,<br />

water, wood), environment (climate, topography, soil, market), <strong>and</strong><br />

humans (family members, relatives, friends, enemies) are essential<br />

components of the analysis.<br />

The tools for the economic analysis of range systems are essentially<br />

the same as those for conventional farm management studies:<br />

budget analysis by groes margins or partial budgeting, linear programming,<br />

<strong>and</strong> discount procedures. However, when these methods<br />

are applied to a range system, the results have become more reliable,<br />

essentially because previously unidentified factors (inputs as well as<br />

outputs) are taken into account.<br />

Little (1984), however, recommending the systems approach, also<br />

points to two major limitations: the assumption that the household is<br />

the proper unit of analysis, <strong>and</strong> the lack offocus on macro <strong>and</strong> micro<br />

linkages in problem solving. He therefore recommends a combination<br />

of household production <strong>and</strong> regional analysis.<br />

Rangel<strong>and</strong> management systems have been divided into two major<br />

systems: nomadic <strong>and</strong> transhumant. Another distinction is based<br />

on l<strong>and</strong> ownership-that is, pastoral nomadic, open-range ranching,<br />

<strong>and</strong> fenced ranching (Behke, 1984; Lawry et al., 1984). This distinction<br />

is addressed in a later section of this chapter.<br />

Rangel<strong>and</strong> Parmlng SYltems<br />

Within the framework of range systems analysis, relatively little<br />

work has been done on livestock-related issues. Several reasons<br />

account for this neglect:<br />

• Most of the research is done by crop-oriented agronomists<br />

<strong>and</strong> social scientists, neither of whom are familiar with livestock <strong>and</strong><br />

therefore tend to overlook their role.<br />

• Most of the livestock have multiple outputs (such as draft<br />

power, meat, milk, manure, hides, status) <strong>and</strong> non-cash inputs (especially<br />

for ruminants).<br />

• A substantial part of these outputs is used within the household<br />

(for example, draft, manure), <strong>and</strong> therefore only indirectly<br />

contributes to the cash income of the pastoralist.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!