TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands
TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands
48 IMPROVEMENT OF TROPIOAL AND SUBTROPIOAL RANGELANDS exploiting a particular environmental niche. Ifone is selling for cash, the feedback loop between subsistence levels and environmental conditions is 18llll effective. If demand for one's product is rising, price increases can more than cover the loa of productivity because of overexploitation of the environment. For example, as a pasture deteriorates, a subsistence herder may only have milk and meat to eat, while a commercial beef producer may for a long time experience stable or even rising income levels. Free labor markets also reduce the risk of degradation for the individual. The destruction of the land may cause hardship, but the Poaibility ofwage labor in the city always exists. In the past, some form of ·passive- management occurred when quantities ofstock died 88 a result of drought. Today, in many parts of Asia and North Africa, herders can maintain herd numbers, even when pastures and water are totally exhausted, by trucking water and feed to their animals until rains restore pastures. The purchase offeed and the delivery of water, often subsidized by governments during droughts, leads to levels of overgrazing that would be impossible for traditionalsubsiatence pastoraliats. An unintended consequence of improving veterinary services and reducing disease is to remove this ·natural- regulator of herd size. Another consequence of the growth of the market economy is that individuals enjoy increased economic independence. In traditional groups, each individual family is dependent on others for survival. In such a setting, social prell8ure and the threat of OIItracism may be sufficient to prevent deviant behavior. The development of a market economy increases economic diff'erentiation and may reduce consensus on resource management questions. Modernization has also contributed to the degradation of the environment in some areas. Improved medical and veterinary techniques have reduced the constraints that disease placed on human and herd numbers. The development of roads and the introduction of motor transport have caused some nomads to become more dependent on herding as caravans have become 18llll profitable and have probably encouraged the switch from camels to cattle. Roads and trucks have also made it profitable to cut fuelwood or produce charcoal at great distances from cities, and trucks make it possible to increase the use of remote or poorly watered pastures (Thalen, 1979). In many cues, mechanised plowing and sowing have made it profitable to plow up rangelands where rainfall is so erratic that only one year in three witnessed sucC8llllful harvests. The introduction of
THE SOorAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IMPROVEMENT 49 new technologies often requires changes in traditional institutions, hence an unintended consequence may be a weakening of those institutions that have in the past protected the environment. In this light, publicly funded revegetation programs may be seen as attempts to correct some of the excesses of rapid social change. AB we can see, then, desertification and the destruction of plant cover have been caused by a number of factors. It is important to remember from these examples that environmental deterioration has been accelerated because the mechanisms that formerly helped people adapt tosemiarid and marginal environments have been weakened. Diversification and mobility have been limited, and the feedback from man's use of the environment has been distorted. Ifrevegetation efforts are to be successful, they must create a sustainable human ecology as well as stable, productive environmental systems. Too often, projects have undermined themselves by ignoring people, or by inadvertently accelerating the processes of declining diversity and mobility in production systems. Successful revegetation requires changes in land use patterns so that the reestablishment of vegetation is encouraged. In the past, attempts have been made to control access to revegetated areas by changing land tenure arrangements. Nomads have been settled, private and group ranches have been created, and forest reserves have been legislated, all in attempts to control access to project lands by reducing animal movement and by restricting people to particular parcels of land. AB previously mentioned, the reduction of mobility may threaten the viability of traditional subsistence systems. Iftheir livelihood is threatened, people may resist overtly or may passively resist by bribing forest guards or by grazing or cutting revegetated areas when they are not being properly guarded. Conflict between traditional users at the very least raises the cost of revegetation substantially, and may in many instances negate project efforts. In some cases, the failure to understand the importance of mobility can mean disaster even when project goals are attained. Boreholes are examples ofefforts to increase available pastures that, in fact, led to local desertification and to heavy livestock losses during droughts (figure 2-4). At other times, the success of programs in one area may lead to larger levels of environmental deterioration outside a project area. Herds that are required to leave the area of a range or reforestation project must go somewhere, hence the revegetation projects may accelerate the processes that they are intended to reverse. The
- Page 8 and 9: can be restored to the world's rang
- Page 10 and 11: 4 Dromedary Pastoralism in Mrica an
- Page 13 and 14: OVERVIEW 3 associated with the exte
- Page 15 and 16: OVERVIEW 5 results, they must be su
- Page 17 and 18: OVERVIEW 7 higher levels of biologi
- Page 19: OVERVIEW 9 of approaching this obje
- Page 23 and 24: Introduction In this report, rangel
- Page 25 and 26: INTRODUCTION 15 protein per hour of
- Page 27 and 28: INTRODUOTION 17 Moreover, grain cro
- Page 29 and 30: Sudan 66 million hectlln8 (permanen
- Page 31 and 32: Zambia Countrywide, Upper Zambesi (
- Page 33 and 34: People's Democratic Republic ofVeme
- Page 35 and 36: Saudi Arabia Countrywide 85 miIllon
- Page 37 and 38: Arghaniatan 30 million hectara Low
- Page 39 and 40: INTRODUCTION 29 knowledge, adaptati
- Page 41 and 42: 1 The Nature ofTropical and Subtrop
- Page 43 and 44: THE NATURE 0' TROPIOAL AND SUBTROPI
- Page 45 and 46: THE NA.TURE OF TROP/OAL AND SUBTROP
- Page 47 and 48: THE NATURE OF TROPICAL AND SUBTROPI
- Page 49 and 50: TllB aoorAL aoNTEXT FOR RANGELAND I
- Page 51 and 52: THE SOOIAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 53 and 54: THE SOOIAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 55 and 56: THE SOOIAL CONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 57: T11B aOorAL OONTl:XT FOR RANQIILAND
- Page 61 and 62: THE SOOIAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 63 and 64: THE SOOIAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 65 and 66: THE ECONOMIC CONTEXT 55 proved extr
- Page 67 and 68: THE ECONOMIC CONTEXT 57 • The cas
- Page 69 and 70: THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 59 Climate and
- Page 71 and 72: THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 61 CAlIH_11ON
- Page 73 and 74: THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 63 and returns
- Page 75 and 76: THE ECONOMIC CONTEXT 65 The basic p
- Page 77 and 78: THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 67 can give a
- Page 79 and 80: THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 69 evaluation.
- Page 81 and 82: THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 71 fashion or
- Page 83 and 84: 4 Regional Resource Assessment The
- Page 85 and 86: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 75 onl
- Page 87 and 88: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 77 wil
- Page 89 and 90: REGIONAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT 79 spe
- Page 91 and 92: REGIONAL RESOUROB ASSB88MENT 81 Aqa
- Page 93 and 94: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 83 imp
- Page 95 and 96: REGIONAL RESOUROE AS8mJSMENT 85 60
- Page 97 and 98: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSB88JlENT 87 Ta
- Page 99 and 100: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 89 •
- Page 101 and 102: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 91 FIG
- Page 103 and 104: N r;; (L ~ C) o ~ -rv • 01 . •
- Page 105 and 106: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 95 The
- Page 107 and 108: SITE EVALUATION 97 The natural proc
48 IMPROVEMENT OF TROPIOAL AND SUBTROPIOAL RANGELANDS<br />
exploiting a particular environmental niche. Ifone is selling for cash,<br />
the feedback loop between subsistence levels <strong>and</strong> environmental conditions<br />
is 18llll effective. If dem<strong>and</strong> for one's product is rising, price<br />
increases can more than cover the loa of productivity because of<br />
overexploitation of the environment. For example, as a pasture deteriorates,<br />
a subsistence herder may only have milk <strong>and</strong> meat to eat,<br />
while a commercial beef producer may for a long time experience<br />
stable or even rising income levels. Free labor markets also reduce<br />
the risk of degradation for the individual. The destruction of the<br />
l<strong>and</strong> may cause hardship, but the Poaibility ofwage labor in the city<br />
always exists.<br />
In the past, some form of ·passive- management occurred when<br />
quantities ofstock died 88 a result of drought. Today, in many parts<br />
of Asia <strong>and</strong> North Africa, herders can maintain herd numbers, even<br />
when pastures <strong>and</strong> water are totally exhausted, by trucking water <strong>and</strong><br />
feed to their animals until rains restore pastures. The purchase offeed<br />
<strong>and</strong> the delivery of water, often subsidized by governments during<br />
droughts, leads to levels of overgrazing that would be impossible<br />
for traditionalsubsiatence pastoraliats. An unintended consequence<br />
of improving veterinary services <strong>and</strong> reducing disease is to remove<br />
this ·natural- regulator of herd size. Another consequence of the<br />
growth of the market economy is that individuals enjoy increased<br />
economic independence. In traditional groups, each individual family<br />
is dependent on others for survival. In such a setting, social prell8ure<br />
<strong>and</strong> the threat of OIItracism may be sufficient to prevent deviant<br />
behavior. The development of a market economy increases economic<br />
diff'erentiation <strong>and</strong> may reduce consensus on resource management<br />
questions.<br />
Modernization has also contributed to the degradation of the<br />
environment in some areas. Improved medical <strong>and</strong> veterinary techniques<br />
have reduced the constraints that disease placed on human<br />
<strong>and</strong> herd numbers. The development of roads <strong>and</strong> the introduction<br />
of motor transport have caused some nomads to become more<br />
dependent on herding as caravans have become 18llll profitable <strong>and</strong><br />
have probably encouraged the switch from camels to cattle. Roads<br />
<strong>and</strong> trucks have also made it profitable to cut fuelwood or produce<br />
charcoal at great distances from cities, <strong>and</strong> trucks make it possible<br />
to increase the use of remote or poorly watered pastures (Thalen,<br />
1979). In many cues, mechanised plowing <strong>and</strong> sowing have made it<br />
profitable to plow up rangel<strong>and</strong>s where rainfall is so erratic that only<br />
one year in three witnessed sucC8llllful harvests. The introduction of