TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

pdf.usaid.gov
from pdf.usaid.gov More from this publisher
17.01.2014 Views

44 IMPROVEMENT OF TROPIOAL AND SUBTROPIOAL RANGELANDS and market opportunities and political control reduce the effectiveness of prior regulatory procedures. Studies of traditional management systems indicate that in those areas where disease and warfare do not prevent overgrazing, a variety of institutions regulate the use of common resources. First, these lands are not open to all potential users, but are either used exclusively by certain groups, or at the very least, some groups are given priority over others. In the case of cropland, people usually need permission from local leaders or councils to use land. Even when access to pastures and woodland was technically open to all, controls over access to water, shelter, and minerals was controlled by localities or owned by individuals. For example, wells and springs are often "owned" by individuals or by small groups (Helland, 1982). Without access to water or to shelter, no one can use pastures, even if they are technically common resources. Subsistence-oriented groups in semiarid lands do not necessarily live in harmony with nature. Pastoralists and agro-pastoralists often significantly alter the vegetation and fauna ofthe areas in which they live. Sometimes they do destroy the resources upon which they depend. If they do 10, they quickly destroy their ability to survive and are either forced to move on or disappear. Direct dependency on the immediate environment for most subsistence needs is a strong incentive for the development of institutions to protect the environment. While most groups living in marginal areas have only rudimentary institutions, in some areas, such as southern Africa and the Atlas Mountains of Morocco, elaborate institutions evolved to regulate pasture use (Bourbouze, 1982; Gilles, 1982; and Odell, 1982). In recent years, many of the mechanisms that have traditionally served to protect vegetation have become less effective. The reasons for this decline are discussed below. CONTEXT OF ENVmONMENTAL DEGRADATION Typically, lands requiring revegetation have had their plant cover destroyed through improper farming methods, the extensive gathering of wood for fuel or construction purposes, or through overgrazing. In terms of destructive impact, cultivation and the gathering of woody species probably have had more impact on the environment than have grazing animals. Livestock are the primary cause of desertification only in areas where large numbers of grazing animals are concentrated, such as around boreholes. Overgrazing is, however, a

THE SOOIAL CONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IMPROVEMENT 45 major C8U8e of vegetative change and often inhibits the restoration of plant cover. Although these three actions of man are the main causes ofenvironmental degradation, the reasons for increased degradation are still debated. Four common reasons for environmental deterioration are climatic change, population growth, economic change, and human fallibility. Usually these factors interact. Over the past 30 years, the human and animal populations using semiarid and marginal lands have grown, thereby putting more preesure on the environment. Given the cycles of wet and drought years common to semiarid regions, such as the West African Sahel, this led to population growth that could only support the population in wet periods. The shortsightedn8111 of governments and donor agencies also has contributed to environmental deterioration. In Africa in particular, ill-conceived water and livestock development projects contributed substantially to overgrazing (Bemus, 1971; Haaland, 1977). These factors have all contributed to the need for revesetation programs, but merely listing the mechanisms and factors leading to environmental problems does not explain the process by which this has occurred. Also, in many cases, de8truction of plants in marginal areas has been occurring at a faster pace than have climatic or population changes. This has been due to factors that have reduced both the mobility and the diversity of traditional economies. Theee factors also undermined traditional mechanisms of environmental protection. The need for revegetation and conservation has been accelerated by the growth in government power, in modem economies, and in the use ofimproved technologies. Changins political conditions have had severe impacts on many pastoral eocieties ofMrica and Asia. In many cases, national boundaries were created in such a way that gruing lands U8ed by one people were split between two or more nations. Over time, nations have increasinSly restricted the movement of people and animals acroes frontiers. Such restrictions reduce the diversity of ecosystems available to herders and lead to herds spending longer periods of time in marginal areas than they had in the past. For example, it has been argued that the imposition of the frontier between Uganda and Kenya was the reason for overgrazing and the destruction of the pastoral economy of the Karamajong of Uganda (Quam, 1978). The imposition of national boundaries also had some impact on trading activities. The growth of state authority has impinged on pastoral production systems in several other ways. To a large degree, governments

44 IMPROVEMENT OF TROPIOAL AND SUBTROPIOAL RANGELANDS<br />

<strong>and</strong> market opportunities <strong>and</strong> political control reduce the effectiveness<br />

of prior regulatory procedures. Studies of traditional management<br />

systems indicate that in those areas where disease <strong>and</strong> warfare<br />

do not prevent overgrazing, a variety of institutions regulate the use<br />

of common resources. First, these l<strong>and</strong>s are not open to all potential<br />

users, but are either used exclusively by certain groups, or at the<br />

very least, some groups are given priority over others. In the case<br />

of cropl<strong>and</strong>, people usually need permission from local leaders or<br />

councils to use l<strong>and</strong>. Even when access to pastures <strong>and</strong> woodl<strong>and</strong><br />

was technically open to all, controls over access to water, shelter, <strong>and</strong><br />

minerals was controlled by localities or owned by individuals. For<br />

example, wells <strong>and</strong> springs are often "owned" by individuals or by<br />

small groups (Hell<strong>and</strong>, 1982). Without access to water or to shelter,<br />

no one can use pastures, even if they are technically common<br />

resources.<br />

Subsistence-oriented groups in semiarid l<strong>and</strong>s do not necessarily<br />

live in harmony with nature. Pastoralists <strong>and</strong> agro-pastoralists often<br />

significantly alter the vegetation <strong>and</strong> fauna ofthe areas in which they<br />

live. Sometimes they do destroy the resources upon which they depend.<br />

If they do 10, they quickly destroy their ability to survive <strong>and</strong><br />

are either forced to move on or disappear. Direct dependency on the<br />

immediate environment for most subsistence needs is a strong incentive<br />

for the development of institutions to protect the environment.<br />

While most groups living in marginal areas have only rudimentary<br />

institutions, in some areas, such as southern Africa <strong>and</strong> the Atlas<br />

Mountains of Morocco, elaborate institutions evolved to regulate<br />

pasture use (Bourbouze, 1982; Gilles, 1982; <strong>and</strong> Odell, 1982). In<br />

recent years, many of the mechanisms that have traditionally served<br />

to protect vegetation have become less effective. The reasons for this<br />

decline are discussed below.<br />

CONTEXT OF ENVmONMENTAL DEGRADATION<br />

Typically, l<strong>and</strong>s requiring revegetation have had their plant cover<br />

destroyed through improper farming methods, the extensive gathering<br />

of wood for fuel or construction purposes, or through overgrazing.<br />

In terms of destructive impact, cultivation <strong>and</strong> the gathering of<br />

woody species probably have had more impact on the environment<br />

than have grazing animals. Livestock are the primary cause of desertification<br />

only in areas where large numbers of grazing animals are<br />

concentrated, such as around boreholes. Overgrazing is, however, a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!