17.01.2014 Views

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE SOOIAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IMPROVEMENT 41<br />

rain received by two plots a few kilometers apart (Gilles <strong>and</strong> Jamtgaard,<br />

1981). Nomadism serves to reduce environmental stress <strong>and</strong><br />

personal risk, but it is also more productive than settled livestock<br />

husb<strong>and</strong>ry. In eastern Mrica, in areas of Masai pastoralism, the<br />

grazing capacity of the l<strong>and</strong> is increased 50 percent because of herd<br />

mobility (Western, 1982). In the important livestock-producing areas<br />

of Mrica, comparisons of the productivity of mobile <strong>and</strong> sedentary<br />

herds have indicated the superiority of mobility. In Sudan, Haal<strong>and</strong><br />

(1977) noted substantially higher mortality rates among sedentary<br />

herds than among mobile ones. Breman <strong>and</strong> de Wit (1983) studied<br />

the migratory system based in the Inl<strong>and</strong> Delta of the Niger River in<br />

Mali, <strong>and</strong> found that its productivity often exceeds that ofAustralian<br />

<strong>and</strong> North American ranches.<br />

Other studies in West Mrica have indicated that a disproportionate<br />

number of sedentary cattle were lost in the 1968-1974 Sahelian<br />

drought. Losses of herds that quickly moved into rainier regions in<br />

response to the drought were minimal (Gallais, 1977; Sall, 1978).<br />

Not only were the impacts of drought less severe on mobile herds,<br />

but migrating herds caused less environmental degradation. Loss of<br />

vegetation around boreholes where herds permanently congregated<br />

was 10 severe that it could be easily recopized from satellite photos.<br />

Mobility is an important aspect of production systems in semiarid<br />

<strong>and</strong> marginal areas.<br />

Mobility is just one way to cope with a harsh environment. Diversification<br />

of subsistence activities is another. For farmers, the<br />

ownership of livestock is one diversification strategy. Animals may<br />

survive even when grain yields are quite low, so livestock may represent<br />

a store of capital that can be used in years of drought. Farmers<br />

may also grow a number of different crops to reduce the risk of crop<br />

failure. Wheat <strong>and</strong> barley or maize <strong>and</strong> sorghum may be grown<br />

together because one species tolerates drought better than another.<br />

Diversification goes beyond the diversification of agricultural enterprises.<br />

Farmers may also have secondary occupations, engage in<br />

trade, or in migrant labor to reduce their dependency on a fickle<br />

pastoral environment. In traditional subsistence-oriented societies,<br />

this diversification lessened the dependence on the immediate environment<br />

<strong>and</strong> lessened the probability of ecological disaster.<br />

At first glance, traditional pastoralists would appear to have been<br />

a highly specialized group dependent solely on livestock production,<br />

but in reality these societies were highly diversified. First, multiple<br />

species of animals were raised (figure 2-2). Camels, cattle, sheep,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!