TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

pdf.usaid.gov
from pdf.usaid.gov More from this publisher
17.01.2014 Views

338 IMPROVEMENT OF TROPIOALAND SUBTROPIOAL RANGELANDS from production and income levels for wildlife on WRR. The stocking rate of the average cattle ranch in the sample was 1 livestock unit per 6.5 hectare. Assuming 400 kg per livestock unit, this translates to 61.54 kg per hectare. Only in 1983 and 1984 do cattle on WRR fall below this stocking rate (see table 10.1). It is assumed therefore that the mixed ranch carried the average stocking rate for cattle in the survey of 61.54 kg per hectare for 1981 and 1982 along with the WRR wildlife stock, and that in 1983 and in 1984 the numbers of cattle and wildlife are as actually existed on WRR, shown in table 10-1. This shows grou returns for WRR nearly double that of the average cattle ranch, and net returns almost 10 times greater. A further economic advantage of the switch to wildlife was the freeing of capital achieved from the sale of domestic animals. Over the four-year period in question, WRR sold more than half its cattle stocks, or nearly 50 kg per hectare, some 400,000 kg live weight. This has a cash value of some 2.8 million Klsh, which, at 1983 exchange rates, exceeded a quarter of a million dollars. Clearly, this money could go toward the conversions needed for wildlife utilization, or be invested elsewhere to significant advantage. The same advantage would be realized on many ranches in Kenya that already have significant stocks of wildlife. In areas lacking wildlife populations, purchase of stocks would necessarily negate this one-time windfall. Meat production from the average cattle ranch in the same survey is 8.33 kg per hectare of carcass weight. The mixed system on WRR (using the same assumptions), averages 30 percent greater production over the four-year period. Production from 1981 to 1984 would be 10.75, 11.45, 10.66, and 10.49 kg of carcass per hectare, respectively. Through the 1984 drought, WRR continued to supply game carcasses in good condition to the market. Every week without fail, harvesting and sales of the wildlife continued. Cattle ranches in the area suffered seriously, with emaciated animals supplying little to the market. There is no doubt that the experimental and demonstration ranch, WRR, has benefited enormously from the inclusion of wildlife as the focus of expanded operations. Gross income is double that of the average cattle ranch and net income 10 times greater. Income for the game, compared with cattle operations on WRR is substantially higher, reflecting higher offtake rates, higher product prices, higher dressing percentages, and the different sales method

WIWLIJ'E LAND USE AT THE ATHI RIVER, KENYA 339 required for the system. The very high offtake rates for wildlife reported here are among the most important findings of the WRR operations, pointing to high fecundity and reproductive growth of wild communities. These findings dramatically contrast auertions in a 1983 Cornell University study. Surprisingly, this study drew definitive conclusions on the complex question: game or cattle for meat production in Kenyan rangelands? based on only eight months of involvement with the initial stages of the WRR wildlife operations in 1981. This was before management or marketing was stabilised, and before reproductive growth or offtake rates reported here were established. Prices for venison on the international market average nearly twice thoee of beef, greatly enhancing the value of wildlife use. Considering the low fat and the absence of chemicals, hormones, and antibiotics (the presence of which tend to reduce the price of domestic meats in the Western world), this price differential is anticipated to be long lasting. CONCLUSION The system of land use for semiarid rangelands developed at WRR, although in full operation for lea than five years, demonstrates a method for protection and regeneration of the land resource. The reestablishment ofnaturalspecies diversity enables the land to return to a positive condition, favoring the entire range of native animals, plants, birds, insects, and soil organisms. From a commercial perspective, the selective harvesting of game animals has been a notable success. Net returns per acre are 10 times those of the average cattle ranch in the area, yet the stocking of wildlife is still one-sixth that of normal cattle numbers. A new industry has been developed in Kenya as a result of this effort, and demand for wild game products from local and foreign markets has developed rapidly. In a variety of fol'IDl!l, the practice of game ranching has steadily gained momentum worldwide over the past 20 years. Successful harvesting operations are ongoing in New Zealand, South Africa, the Soviet Union, and elsewhere. The focus of those activities, however, is generally on meat production or sport hunting exclusively. The author's method, in contrast, is multidimensional and more relevant to the specific needs of areas where both economic development and resource protection are essential. His wildlife land-use system rests

WIWLIJ'E LAND USE AT THE ATHI RIVER, KENYA 339<br />

required for the system. The very high offtake rates for wildlife<br />

reported here are among the most important findings of the WRR<br />

operations, pointing to high fecundity <strong>and</strong> reproductive growth of<br />

wild communities.<br />

These findings dramatically contrast auertions in a 1983 Cornell<br />

University study. Surprisingly, this study drew definitive conclusions<br />

on the complex question: game or cattle for meat production in<br />

Kenyan rangel<strong>and</strong>s? based on only eight months of involvement<br />

with the initial stages of the WRR wildlife operations in 1981. This<br />

was before management or marketing was stabilised, <strong>and</strong> before<br />

reproductive growth or offtake rates reported here were established.<br />

Prices for venison on the international market average nearly<br />

twice thoee of beef, greatly enhancing the value of wildlife use. Considering<br />

the low fat <strong>and</strong> the absence of chemicals, hormones, <strong>and</strong><br />

antibiotics (the presence of which tend to reduce the price of domestic<br />

meats in the Western world), this price differential is anticipated<br />

to be long lasting.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The system of l<strong>and</strong> use for semiarid rangel<strong>and</strong>s developed at<br />

WRR, although in full operation for lea than five years, demonstrates<br />

a method for protection <strong>and</strong> regeneration of the l<strong>and</strong> resource. The<br />

reestablishment ofnaturalspecies diversity enables the l<strong>and</strong> to return<br />

to a positive condition, favoring the entire range of native animals,<br />

plants, birds, insects, <strong>and</strong> soil organisms.<br />

From a commercial perspective, the selective harvesting of game<br />

animals has been a notable success. Net returns per acre are 10<br />

times those of the average cattle ranch in the area, yet the stocking<br />

of wildlife is still one-sixth that of normal cattle numbers. A new<br />

industry has been developed in Kenya as a result of this effort, <strong>and</strong><br />

dem<strong>and</strong> for wild game products from local <strong>and</strong> foreign markets has<br />

developed rapidly.<br />

In a variety of fol'IDl!l, the practice of game ranching has steadily<br />

gained momentum worldwide over the past 20 years. Successful<br />

harvesting operations are ongoing in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, South Africa, the<br />

Soviet Union, <strong>and</strong> elsewhere. The focus of those activities, however,<br />

is generally on meat production or sport hunting exclusively. The<br />

author's method, in contrast, is multidimensional <strong>and</strong> more relevant<br />

to the specific needs of areas where both economic development <strong>and</strong><br />

resource protection are essential. His wildlife l<strong>and</strong>-use system rests

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!